• @Jimmyeatsausage
            link
            37 months ago

            It’s apparently a highy effective body plan. Look up “Carcinization”, things keep evolving into crabs, independently of one another.

        • @HessiaNerd
          link
          17 months ago

          Don’t leave us hanging… You got them cool crab facts?

          • Da Bald Eagul
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            Animals just keep evolving into crabs lol. Apparently it’s pretty effective.

    • @NeptuneOrbit
      link
      17 months ago

      The article implies they are all subspecies of the rail in the first place. So likely?

  • @Missmuffet
    link
    67 months ago

    Theoretically would this bird be able to make fertile chicks with the extant species?

    • Dr. Coomer
      link
      English
      37 months ago

      Probably? They both evolved from the same bird, so why not?

      • @Sylvartas
        link
        27 months ago

        Isn’t it possible that the “new” bird is functionally identical to the extinct one, but achieves this through different genetic mutations ? In that case, would the new bird still be able to breed with the extinct one ?

        • Dr. Coomer
          link
          English
          37 months ago

          That is true, but there are subspecies which are made from two similar animals, like a horse and donkey make a mule.

          • @Jimmyeatsausage
            link
            27 months ago

            Mules are sterile, though. It’s much rarer for different subspecies to make viable, fertile offspring.

          • @Sylvartas
            link
            17 months ago

            Yeah, I figured this stuff was way above my biology knowledge. I guess the real question is “what actually makes a subspecies unable to have fertile offspring with another subspecies?”

            And I suspect the answer is a biology paper with a 3 digits number of pages

  • @Grabthar
    link
    27 months ago

    Pkunk are (going to be) real?