• Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
    link
    fedilink
    2027 months ago

    I mean tbf it’s right about when you think you’re really good at it that driving drunk ends up fucking you so… shockingly accurate?

    • @Potatos_are_not_friends
      link
      487 months ago

      It’s like riding a motorcycle - it’s not IF you crash, it’s WHEN.

      I stopped hanging out with a girl I knew in college. She nearly crashed her car twice while drunk driving in her 20s, non-fatal, and constantly bragged about it. And not sure why she likes risking her life or of innocent people.

      No idea what she’s doing in her life now.

      • JJROKCZ
        link
        27 months ago

        Hopefully not driving, and not drinking, but really hope not both at once anymore

  • moosetwin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1407 months ago

    It should have made the controls more sensitive over time so at the end you’re swerving back and forth

    • @kn33
      link
      English
      1307 months ago

      Or just increase your “drunk meter” by increasing the input lag. Then have someone walk out into a crosswalk or something.

    • Fubber Nuckin'
      link
      67 months ago

      Simply have the game swerve for you and you have to correct it.

  • @marzhall
    link
    1157 months ago

    They should end it by having another drunk driver come out of left field and crash into you instead

    • @turddle
      link
      127 months ago

      Or flashing red & blues in the rearview

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        297 months ago

        Then the red and blue becomes the victory condition. We had to ban bars from having coin op breathelizers because folks were trying to get high scores.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1027 months ago

    Actually I like how European/American Truck Simulator models tiredness. At some point you see some black out and the controls don’t respond for a few seconds. Good luck recovering from that depending on the driving situation.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    707 months ago

    We did this in highschool but with a texting and driving simulator. You had to drive the car and not hit a ton of obstacles meanwhile texting back a specific message in response to incoming text messages. I played a shit ton of video games as a child so I was super good at this and never crashed. Made the gym teacher mad. I still understood the point of it though of course but I liked being able to beat the game.

  • @suction
    link
    49
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Drunk driving is absolutely safe, it’s just a ploy by the globalists to keep men from being manly and keep Trump out of office!!! All Trump fans should protest by loading their family into their cars and drunk drive around Pro-Trump neighbourhoods at breakneck speed.

  • mozz
    link
    fedilink
    477 months ago

    It should have just pulled you over after a certain length of time

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          77 months ago

          Nah, I meant more that it was next to impossible to not get the cops on you when you drove drunk. Even if you somehow managed to drive reasonably well (which was stupid hard), getting anywhere within a block of a cop set them on you.

  • @AeonFelis
    link
    English
    167 months ago

    Ah, yes. Using an obvious lie to prove your point. This only works, of course, when you have some authority over the people you are trying to convince.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    27 months ago

    lol… when I was in high school there was some sort of D.A.R.E. program, just named something else… they asked us to wear goggles that was supposed to simulate vision while high on marijuana. I burst into laughter and said, “this absolutely does NOT happen to your vision on marijuana.”

    The goggles had a haze-like film and some other sort of fractal film where each movement you made it was supposed to simulate hallucinations / flutter vision… the police officer who looked like he was maybe in his mid twenties had a grin on his face as I passed the goggles onto the next person.

    That was a point in my life when I realized… the authority we’re supposed to obey are just average dumb ass non-thinking humans… what we call today, NPCs.

    • DaBabyAteMaDingo
      link
      77 months ago

      Driving under the influence is driving under the influence. No two ways about it.

    • @MalachaiConstant
      link
      27 months ago

      So I’ll agree I think weed is overall safer than alcohol (just my own feeling, not backed by anything), but it is by no means safe.

      I used to do it all the time when I was young but I stopped after one very stupid near-miss: I completely failed to notice a car was stopped in the middle of the road because I was too busy admiring how fucking cool the moon looked at that moment.

      Not worth

  • Dreizehn
    link
    fedilink
    -697 months ago

    Driving while yapping away on a Galaxy or iPhone is worse than being fucking drunk. Both, is double worse.

      • @cmbabul
        link
        237 months ago

        A phone conversation is for sure not as bad as driving drunk, however browsing and texting might be worse than some of the lower BA levels

      • Dreizehn
        link
        fedilink
        -67 months ago

        A test, on a closed circuit, was conducted in Germany, perhaps 10 years ago. The mobile phone users were worse than the damn drunks.

        • @Bernie_Sandals
          link
          107 months ago

          One test on a track ten years ago is not evidence that being drunk is less harmful than talking on a cellphone while driving.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          67 months ago

          What are the parameters here? Are we talking texting while driving compared to two beers? Browsing Amazon compared to a liter of vodka?

    • @Shadowedcross
      link
      527 months ago

      True, that’s why I only yap away on Motorolas while driving.

    • @Shanedino
      link
      157 months ago

      I never understood the thought of handless calling being a bad thing, like sure it’s slightly distracting but not more so than talking to a passenger.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        137 months ago

        The difference is an adult passenger tend to also be somewhat aware of what’s going on on the road and will tend to shut up when things get hairy, even if only through panic. Someone one the other end of a phone won’t until they hear the crunch.

    • Nate
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Mythbusters: Driving Drunk Vs Mobile Phone

      Edit: Episode Part 1/3 Part 3/3 (I couldn’t find 2/3 anywhere annoyingly enough)

      TL:DW: They found driving while using a cell phone is potentially as dangerous as driving drunk. They scored lower in their crash course while on the phone

      Important to note:

      • They didn’t mention how much alcohol was consumed (or they did in the episode and not in this clip, give me a break I found this in 2 minutes on the shitter)
      • They show them taking a breathalyzer test. Im going to assume they were testing to be over the limit to get a DUI (.08% in the US), though it’s not shown or mentioned A clip of part 3/3 says that they stayed below the legal limit (@ .065%) so they would NOT be legally intoxicated
      • The sample size is like, 2. Not very statistically accurate, as mythbusters is entertainment and not a real scientific study
      • Theyre on a closed course. No pedestrians, no stop lights, no other drivers, no “unpredictable” variables in which you would need your reaction time, which would be impaired if you were drunk
      • Theyre using flip phones held up to their ears, on a phone call. Results probably vary (though are probably worse) texting vs a phone call and on modern devices vs old ones

      No real claim either way to one being worse. Moral of the story being get off your fucking phone and don’t drive drunk and you dont need to worry. [email protected]’s claims aren’t necessary wrong, but they’re not necessary right either