Hundreds of helmeted police swarmed the site of a pro-Palestinian protest at the University of California at Los Angeles early on Thursday, firing flash bangs, arresting defiant demonstrators and dismantling their encampment.

The pre-dawn police crackdown at UCLA marked the latest flashpoint in mounting tensions on U.S. college campuses, where protests over Israel’s war in Gaza have led to student clashes with each other and with law enforcement.

“I’m a student here. I’m an English major,” one student said to television cameras, as police dragged him away. “Please don’t fail us. Don’t fail us.”

Live TV footage showed officers taking down tents, tearing apart barricades and removing the encampment, while arrested protesters sat with their hands restrained behind their backs with zip-ties.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    835 months ago

    i cannot believe they think we are stupid enough to accept that shooting rubber bullets at unarmed student protestors on public property is justified and morally correct.

    paternalistic bullshit like that breeds hatred and contempt; they are making their own enemies in order to justify more crackdowns, and more fascist behavior.

    it’s dark, but it will pass. i hope for the better.

    • @Arbiter
      link
      235 months ago

      It won’t pass on its own though, collective political action is required to make it pass.

    • @Anti_Iridium
      link
      165 months ago

      It especially pisses me off that they aren’t even using them correctly.

      They are not direct fire, you’re supposed to bounce them off the ground.

      • @Madison420
        link
        35 months ago

        It receives federal funds so yes in a limited way it is. Doesn’t matter though because they have rights as a paying customer redressing both the government and their school.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        Public property as we knew it in the 60’s has been completely privatised. Our legal system definitions of public spaces haven’t caught up with the modern reality of these spaces so let’s not defend police brutality with this “was it REALLY a public space” semantic bullshit.

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    61
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    UCLA CRACKDOWN CAME DAY AFTER VIOLENT CLASH

    UCLA had canceled classes for the day on Wednesday following a violent clash between the encampment’s occupants and a group of masked counter-demonstrators who mounted a surprise assault late Tuesday night on the tent city.

    The occupants of the camp, set up last week, had remained mostly peaceful before the melee, in which both sides traded blows and doused each other with pepper spray.

    It’s an excellent analogue to what’s going on in West Bank and Gaza. Violent Israeli settlers attack a peaceful Palestian camp, there is resistance to the aggression, then the big guns arrive to defend the Israelis and do the rest of the work to raid, displace, arrest and/or kill the Palestinian side.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    445 months ago

    UCLA is a public university. They have a right to protest there!

    • @Eyeuhnluuung
      link
      -15 months ago

      There are still time, place and manner restrictions on protests at a public university.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        55 months ago

        I didn’t realize there was a time, place and manner for us to freely express ourselves in protest. I thought it was an American thing to protest. Not anymore I guess.

        • @Eyeuhnluuung
          link
          3
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Even first amendment rights are not unlimited. Regardless of how you feel, it’s just a simple constitutional matter. This is like middle school civics stuff.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            35 months ago

            Public universities are public property and publicly funded. There is a right to protest there.

            • @Eyeuhnluuung
              link
              -25 months ago

              With reasonable restrictions on time, place and matter decided by the university.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                35 months ago

                If they are paying to go to the university and I’m paying taxes for them to go to the university, why does the university get to decide that they aren’t allowed to exercise their first amendment rights?

                • @Eyeuhnluuung
                  link
                  05 months ago

                  They are allowed to express their first amendment rights, but first amendment rights are not unlimited. See Ward v Rock Against Racism (1989) where the Supreme Court developed a test for time-place-manner restrictions.

                  You can disagree with the law and very well established Supreme Court precedent, but you can’t generally argue that the universities are violating the law by creating time, place and manner restrictions for free speech (unless they are failing the time-place-manner test).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -145 months ago

      They don’t. All UC Campuses are private property of the UC Regents. Just because something is owned by the state, that doesn’t mean there are no rules. A courtroom is a good example. These students have no legal right to camp there without permission.

      A better question is, does this eviction diffuse the issue? I would say “no”. The campers will be back anyway. But I also think the camping is distracting from the actual point of the protest. Why don’t these students just sleep in their beds and show up everyday to protest? Why do they need to be there at night when nobody sees them?

      • @something_random_tho
        link
        22
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Their strategy is very clearly making the university uncomfortable and getting the entire nation discussing it, so I’d say it’s working pretty well so far.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -345 months ago

          Their strategy is being performative, whiny shits for tiktok videos. They have no clue what they’re talking about, or the context for the current situation. Just more terminally online lefties that would rather camp out than go to class.

          The nation was already discussing Israel-Palestine, these people are just being self-indulgent and making it about themselves. They don’t give a shit about Palestinians unless it’s trending.

      • @ultranaut
        link
        45 months ago

        All UC Campuses are private property of the UC Regents.

        That doesn’t sound right. The University of California system is public, the regents are appointed by the governor. UC property is owned by the state of California.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          55 months ago

          I’m not sure what to tell you other than you’re straight up wrong, mate. I agree that they should be public property 100% but that’s not what the law says, unjust or otherwise.

          UC property is owned by a public trust, which is a private entity, therefore the land is private property.

          Again I’m not saying I like it but unless the law changes, the state may enforce it with their monopoly on violence.

          The question is, what can oppressed people do against a tyrannical government when peaceful protest is met with violence?

          The answer is not allowed.

          • @ultranaut
            link
            35 months ago

            A public trust is not a private entity, that’s why it’s called a public trust. What you’re claiming about the UC system doesn’t make sense. The power the regents wield flows from the governor and that’s it, the UC system is not privately owned.

            • @BradleyUffner
              link
              English
              15 months ago

              By that logic the public owns all the police cars too, but you’re going to have a bad day if you decide to take one.

              • @ultranaut
                link
                35 months ago

                Yes. The police have not been privatized yet, all the police cars are in fact owned by the public.

                • @BradleyUffner
                  link
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  You missed my main point, where even though the public could be considered the owner of police cars, you can’t just take one and do whatever you want with it.

      • @Maggoty
        link
        25 months ago

        There’s a giant difference between a court room and a glorified park. There is not a security concern at the university’s green space.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    415 months ago

    Breaking news, Violent pro Palestinian student protestors assault riot police fists with their faces. More at six!

    Biden condemns the violence.

    This is America. Land of the fascists and home of the corporate oligarchs and military industrial complex.

      • @jumjummy
        link
        95 months ago

        Yes because Biden directed the police personally. You’re thinking of what Trump would do since he would just tweet directly at the police and tell them not to be gentle with the protestors.

        Trump would be 1000% worse so stop with the “don’t vote for Biden and let Trump win” Russian propoganda.

        • @Maggoty
          link
          45 months ago

          He came out and made a big statement about how we “need order”.

          So yeah, couldn’t be more clear.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -75 months ago

          Hate to break it to you but I don’t think Biden is going to win this election unfortunately. It would probably help if he stopped spitting in liberals’ faces, but I don’t think he’ll do it.

        • @EvilEyedPanda
          link
          65 months ago

          I can’t wait to see him lose again, so more trumptards can get arrested when they pull another half cocked insurrection