• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    39312 days ago

    Trump appointee Aileen Cannon indefinitely postpones Trump classified documents trial, but I hardly see why that’s relevant.

      • @Delusional
        link
        3312 days ago

        Idk trump standards are “do the opposite of what is good and right” so this seems right up the trump standards alley.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    311
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Open corruption. Cool cool cool.

    Maybe there should be, idk, consequences?

    Let’s ask the rich people who groomed and appointed her. Oh, no? Well okay then.

    Off to the m*l*t*v store.

    • @kylie_kraft
      link
      4512 days ago

      you go ahead, I got like five seasons of Succession to catch up on

      /s, in case anyone needs it

      • @NJSpradlin
        link
        1512 days ago

        You make an extremely good point. And I hope others can see it for what it really means.

    • @Daft_ish
      link
      2412 days ago

      We have the opportunity to vote for holding Trump accountable in November… if anyone cares anymore.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        611 days ago

        What a cool system where a judge openly breaks the law for the man whok appointed her and supreme court justices openly take bribes, and there are no consequences for either.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    248
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Make sure you don’t vote for Biden though, because of that one issue you suddenly care about.

    Inb4 the standard myopic replies from .ml accounts

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      17912 days ago

      that one issue you suddenly care about.

      That will also be significantly worse under Trump.

      • @paddirn
        link
        English
        2112 days ago

        Yeah, but then 81 year old Biden will have sure have learned his lesson (wags finger)

          • androogee (they/she)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1512 days ago

            What a bad “cynicism is easier than engaging with reality” zero-brain take.

            Many politicians just suck. Of course.

            But some politicians are clearly trying, growing, learning, and improving. And throwing them out with the bathwater, giving them no support, and equating them to the ones that suck is terminally, suicidally stupid.

            But hey, cynicism is easy. People think you’re cool, and you don’t have to put any effort in.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -3
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              I hope Biden can grow and improve quicker, like preferably before election day so a bunch of voters won’t feel bad about voting for him. I really don’t want Trump.

              • androogee (they/she)
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                11 days ago

                Biden is easily the best president of my lifetime by a factor of 10, but good governance is boring and quiet, while propaganda is loud and distracting.

                If just doing a good job isn’t enough, then what else is there?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  011 days ago

                  He’s pretty good on most things, except the genocide issue. Which is unfortunate because that’s a big one for a whole lot of people. Which makes sense. No one will say Mussolini helped the trains run on time or Hitler’s wars helped the German economy. The other bad things they did make those things seem less consequential. Genocide is like that. A lot of people here are lucky because they live in the imperial core, but for others who knows those being affected by the foreign policy, then it’s priority rises even more.

    • @barsquid
      link
      3412 days ago

      It is also the lone issue that Repubs somehow aren’t oppositional defiant disorder about. “Let’s get the Muslim ban guy back in there, he’ll save Palestine.”

      Turns out there are plenty of useful idiots who think they are insulated from the consequences of an election by campus security and daddy’s money.

      But then others of them know what they’re up to. They want Donald to help speed the collapse so China can gain more ground. That’s hypocrisy, those guys don’t give a shit about human rights abuses as long as the nation committing them pretends to be socialist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1512 days ago

      I.e. russian trolls playing the “thoughtful liberal” telling a heartfelt story about how they cannot vote for Biden in good conscience because of this issue.

    • @Maggoty
      link
      112 days ago

      Myopia is common in all computer users though?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -1511 days ago

      I like how you avoid saying what the issue is, because it sounds a lot worse when you say it’s genocide. I think that’s a fair line in the sand to draw for people. Hopefully Biden movies on that stance soon so we don’t get Trump. We all better keep pushing him.

    • fiend_unpleasant ☑️
      link
      -3812 days ago

      I stopped voting when Obama didn’t stop that thing that we “suddenly care about”. Blue MAGA == Red MAGA

        • JackFrostNCola
          link
          English
          312 days ago

          Would a person be a single issue voter if Trump being the president was the issue? 🤔

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            311 days ago

            Nah, once you consider being for or against someone to be a “single issue”, then most votes through history get wrapped up in it, rendering it kind of moot.

            Additionally, I can easily break down the actual issues behind why I’m voting against trump :)

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      English
      7312 days ago

      How?

      Wouldn’t she need to be to be impeached by the House? The house is controlled by the GOP. Even if a few republicans wanted to remove her, you would still need the GOP speaker to bring this to the floor.

      • @danc4498
        link
        English
        1912 days ago

        The prosecutor can request that she be removed from the case, but that’s extreme and, if fails, leaves him with a hostile judge that is also even more empowered than before.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1612 days ago

        The prosecutor would have to ask for her removal, which would be difficult to accomplish for sure.

        • @SkyezOpen
          link
          1512 days ago

          I’m sure he already has enough ammo to do so. That whole jury instruction thing was FUCKED.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1512 days ago

        And the house GOP passed a law that lets them oust their own speaker with a minority vote, too.

        • Ghostalmedia
          link
          English
          58
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          That’s not true.

          It still requires a simple majority to remove a speaker. In the case of Kevin McCarthy, the vote was 216 to 210, in favor of removal.

          What is new is that the GOP is allowing anyone to bring a motion to vacate to the floor. You still need a majority vote to oust someone, but any yahoo can now force the house to drop everything and vote on removing the speaker.

          That causes chaos and previously it required a higher bar to get a motion to vacate rolling.

      • @Resonosity
        link
        411 days ago

        It’d be nice if we had retention elections for these judges. The executive branch nominates judges and the legislative confirms them, but I’d like to see a choice on my ballot every so many years after a judge has been installed asking whether that judge should stay in office or not.

        Funny enough, Wikipedia mentions how scholars are opposed to retention elections because the judiciary is supposed to be the most removed from public opinion and introducing that would lead to special interest groups swaying outcomes and generally breeding corruption. The squeeze is that we’re already seeing corruption in courts anyways because of the very branches that install judges in the first place. All you have to do is look at this article or the Supreme Court.

        Now the real question would be if Supreme Court justices should be up for retention. That’s a rabbit hole I’m not sure what the consequences would lead to. Seems like term limits are still appropriate.

      • @Daft_ish
        link
        211 days ago

        Couldn’t the bar take her license away?

  • @Nobody
    link
    English
    15712 days ago

    Justice delayed is justice denied.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13912 days ago

    Friendly reminder that Judge Aileen Cannon was a Trump appointee. So much for proving the critics wrong.

    • @hydrospanner
      link
      5611 days ago

      And she’s also wildly incompetent and biased, with this just being the latest in a long string of obvious moves to help him.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        And also wildly inexperienced and unqualified for the role when she was appointed, having had no actual trial experience at that point.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12312 days ago

    I want to THANK Aileen Canon for making it LEGAL to STEAL TOP SECRET UNITED STATES DEFENSE DOCUMENTS!

    • @T00l_shed
      link
      4612 days ago

      No, it’s not legal for others to do. Just trump and his buddies.

      • @InternetCitizen2
        link
        912 days ago

        What if I report the value to the IRS under other income?

        • androogee (they/she)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          712 days ago

          Still have to declare under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (unless you’re friends with a judge)

  • @rayyy
    link
    10411 days ago

    So, no laws for the rich and they aren’t even pretending.

    • @eldavi
      link
      22
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      So, no laws for the rich

      the only surprising thing about this is that not everyone already knew this.

      it’s not snark or sarcasm: this is true more often than not and i guess people really don’t like paying attention.

        • @blazeknave
          link
          511 days ago

          Why always with the French. They waited for us to go first anyhoo. Let’s take back the I word from them and those Redcoats, I mean hats… I’m rocking stars and stripes and remembering 76! This our goddamn America, and they can hate our freedoms all they want, but this is the US motherfuckin A!

        • @eldavi
          link
          210 days ago

          their protest used to start revolutions and now their protests are safely ignored until they run out of steam; the people in charge have gotten really good forcing everyone else to choose between a future and right now

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        311 days ago

        As you get older, the internet remains the same cluster of ages. There are probably people on here twenty years younger than you.

      • @andros_rex
        link
        310 days ago

        Yeah - my wealthy ex’s family bought him expensive lawyers, so he got to ignore multiple court orders during the divorce, while mine took $3k to do fuck all. “Justice” is contingent on being able to afford good lawyers.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      1011 days ago

      Listen, I’ve seen this in every thread. The judges are just being extra careful so they can make sure the case doesn’t get thrown out because it’s a highly sensitive subject.

      Four years just wasn’t enough time. You have to be patient about these things. Give us another Friedman Unit or two to settle things out.

      • @T00l_shed
        link
        1411 days ago

        /s I hope? Otherwise you know she was appointed by trump right.

        • @lennybird
          link
          English
          611 days ago

          They’re trying to conflate a right-wing judge’s bias with those biG bAd LibErAlS who defend Garland’s meticulous albeit slow investigation and hand-off to Jack Smith I guess.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1011 days ago

        This is case with the trial judge he appointed himself, not the criminal trial on the hush money. The latter is being handled seriously.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        411 days ago

        Not sure if sarcasm or not, but after following quite a few (yes, YouTube) lawyers on this subject, I think it’s fair to say that a lot of it actually is that; Trump is a slippery bastard and getting him convicted is hard. last thing you want is to convict him, have fox news pull the “they made a mistake” cars, and actually be right. Once trump goes to jail, you better be sure he stays there.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil
          link
          1811 days ago

          Trump is a slippery bastard and getting him convicted is hard.

          Trump is sloppy, inept, and surrounded by people who routinely rat him out.

          He’s not slippery. He’s just standard-tier corrupt. That’s all it takes to defer prosecution indefinitely.

          Once trump goes to jail

          He’s not going to jail.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            511 days ago

            This. I cannot believe how naive people are being about this Trump thing. He’s not going to jail.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 days ago

          If you’ve been following it, then you would know not to believe a single fucking thing Aileen Cannon says.

  • @smokin_shinobi
    link
    9312 days ago

    Anybody know of any groups organizing a general strike? We are gonna have to stop the flow of money to these fucking vampires.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2712 days ago

      Probably not quite what your looking for, but I literally just came across this article about a potential general strike in 4 years:

      “UAW president Shawn Fain on May Day calls on unions to prepare for strike in 2028”

      https://www.al.com/news/2024/05/uaw-president-shawn-fain-on-may-day-calls-on-unions-to-prepare-for-strike-in-2028.html

      “We are fully preparing to strike on May Day 2028,” Shawn Fain wrote in a proposal on May Day, or International Workers Day.

      Fain said it is the only way workers can “win universal healthcare and the right to retire with dignity.”

      [In an op-ed (https://inthesetimes.com/article/may-day-2028-general-strike-working-class) for progressive publication In These Times, Fain said the union’s recent auto contracts were all aligned to expire on April 30, 2028. He called on other unions to do the same as way to mass power to “reshape the economy into one that works for the benefit of everyone.”

      “They want us to believe that corporate bosses gave workers decent wages, benefits and safer working conditions out of the goodness of their hearts. That justice and equality for people of color, for immigrants, for women and for queer communities were gifts benevolently handed down from above,” Fain wrote.

      “But we know the truth. Every law passed, every union formed and contract won—every improvement made at the workplace—has been won through the tireless sacrifice of the working class.”

  • DaBabyAteMaDingo
    link
    9212 days ago

    Friendly reminder to vote for Biden this election. It’s more important now than ever.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2611 days ago

      Oh man.

      After all this blue-ball edging and postponing I would so dearly love to see Biden win and then Trump all these stalled cases can get wrapped up.

      • @assassin_aragorn
        link
        711 days ago

        I’d prefer for the cases to get wrapped up before the election, but I’ll settle for Biden winning and the delay tactics all becoming moot as Trump reaps what he sows.

        It might actually become a motivational point for both sides in this election for Trump to either see justice or skirt by it.

      • @Xanis
        link
        110 days ago

        I honestly think if Biden wins a second term he might just stop giving a fuck and just begin abusing his power in a positive way.

        That’s my hope anyway. It’d be both a good thing if done well and hilarious.

    • TheHarpyEagle
      link
      911 days ago

      I will but, god, if I hold my nose any harder, I’ll pinch it right off.

      • @Kaput
        link
        611 days ago

        Northern neighbor here, thank you. I don’t want to see Trump back, but am also glad I don’t have to vote in your elections. Not that I hate Biden, but your Democrats make our conservatives look like Communists…

  • @resetbypeer
    link
    9112 days ago

    Ladies and gentlemen, the party of law and order. We know who will be selected as the new supreme court judge soon…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -8912 days ago

      Who’s the president right now? Wonder what he’s up to. Wonder if he’s fixing this. Wonder if he’s anything better than the capitalistic fascist of American conservatism.

      • @barsquid
        link
        4912 days ago

        I wish we had better civics classes in schools. It would be nice to skip past all the 13-year-olds’ spicy takes on why this judge is somehow Biden’s fault.

        • Panda (he/him)
          link
          fedilink
          110 days ago

          “the fact that i am at risk of seeing a 14 year old’s opinion at any time of day on the internet is a human rights violation” - nostradamus, 2020

      • @baru
        link
        3112 days ago

        Republicans have the majority at the moment. A president isn’t a dictator, though Trump is planning to become one.

      • @resetbypeer
        link
        22
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Well if the supreme Court will give presidents immunity prior November, so that Trump can participate, then Biden just has to order a hit on him. because, you know presidents are immune… Problem solved

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 days ago

          If Trump is actually, as so many claim, a threat to our way of government then he’s a domestic enemy.

          I guess maybe that’s all just trivial talk though.

      • @RunningInRVA
        link
        15
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        What would you suggest he do specifically?

      • deaf_fish
        link
        fedilink
        811 days ago

        Seems like you want to say something there little buddy. Be brave, say what you want to say instead of asking questions.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -411 days ago

          Those questions are extremely easily translated into statements:

          Biden is President right now
          He’s doing nothing to fix this

          Gosh my brain hurts after all that generous reading.

          • deaf_fish
            link
            fedilink
            211 days ago

            I agree with that. How is that relevant to the root of this conversation?

            Just because the Republicans are shit doesn’t mean that the Democrats are not also shit.

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 days ago

            Do you even know what a president does? The fuck kind of idiotic take is this?

            Take a fucking civics course dumbass

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        411 days ago

        He doesn’t have the majority needed to do all that needs to be done, otherwise he could’ve expanded SCOTUS already and reversed half the bullshit.

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 days ago

        You wonder if the president is “fixing this”?

        How do you think this country works??

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        -611 days ago

        Who’s the president right now?

        Vladimir Putin, according to the memes.

  • @xkforce
    link
    89
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Where are all those people that said Cannon “wouldnt ruin her career” doing something like this after it was pointed out that Trump appointed her?

      • @barsquid
        link
        3012 days ago

        He got what he wanted. The only thing that will happen is the bus bouncing a couple times after he throws her under it. Source: look at every other person in Donald’s orbit.

    • @0110010001100010
      link
      5812 days ago

      The only surprising bit is that it took this long. I pretty much figured she would do that out of the gate.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        5612 days ago

        She had to let the clock run out a while first. Can’t have this trial going on while he’s president after all.

      • @macarthur_park
        link
        3012 days ago

        By dragging it out this long, she made it impossible for Trump’s other cases in Georgia and DC to be scheduled.