Mozilla is introducing a new feature to Firefox aimed at protecting users from bounce trackers, the browser developer has announced. Bounce tracking is a technique where a user clicks a link but ends up reaching their intended destination via an intermediary tracking page. This allows trackers to place and read 'first-party cookies,' which aren’t blocked by the browser, unlike third-party
  • @[email protected]
    21•5 months ago

    This is exceptionally frustrating.

    If someone posts a YouTube link on Facebook it will show the thumbnail and the description and that’s it. There’s literally no way to locate the video because it obscures the address, ensuring that the only way to reach that link is by clicking it and running through Facebook’s tracking system (l.facebook.com).

    YouTube itself has also begun doing the same thing, obscuring the title and channel in the browser, so you can’t even search for the video via FreeTube or NewPipe or anything else.

    Reddit is also doing this now by hijacking links and redirecting to out.reddit.com

    Sad days.

      • @[email protected]
        3•4 months ago

        I have all kinds of software that are supposed to stop this. They don’t work.

        I even manually add the tracking domains and they still don’t work.

        • Possibly linuxEnglish
          -3•4 months ago

          Its called using third party front ends. The extensions just redirect and replace

            • Possibly linuxEnglish
              1•4 months ago

              Extensions or front ends?

              For extensions I use libredirect and for YouTube I use invidious. Libreredirect redirects YouTube links and replaces embedded YouTube videos.

    • @Konstant
      5•5 months ago

      Twitter also was one of the first hijacking links a long time ago.

  • @solrize
    17•5 months ago

    How about stopping link hover from showing its own nonsense in the status line, Mozilla. The status line should always show the real link destination.

    • @something_random_tho
      17•5 months ago

      It could only know that by navigating to the link in the background. That would have side effects, like them being able to track you even when you don’t click on links.

      • @solrize
        8•5 months ago

        If the link is to a redirector then that’s what should show in the status line.

      • @grueEnglish
        5•5 months ago

        Fine! If there’s Javascript fuckery going on, then the status line should say “WARNING: JAVASCRIPT FUCKERY!”

      • @[email protected]
        -4•5 months ago

        I don’t pretend to know how any of this works, but the link is obviously already there in the browser, otherwise it couldn’t direct you to it.

        • Bezier
          7•5 months ago

          But it doesn’t always point to the destination. Instead, it points to another page that then redirects you to the destination.

          Your browser does not know the address of the destination, only the addresss of the middleman tracking webpage.

        • @something_random_tho
          5•5 months ago

          The point of this is that it’s a redirect. The link isn’t taking you to xyz.com, it’s going to abc.com which redirects to xyz.com. The abc.com server redirects to the second link – there’s no way to know where it’ll take you unless you follow it.

          • @[email protected]
            -5•5 months ago

            Except if you hover over it, the browser will show you where it’s redirecting to and not the tracking URL. That’s the whole point.

      • @solrize
        -4•4 months ago

        No it’s the browser’s fault for enabling the deception. You have to assume that any given website is malicious. The browser is a security product that is supposed to be on our side and protect us from evil websites. Blaming the website for exploiting protection failures puts the responsibility in the wrong place. It’s like taking counterfeit antibiotics, getting sick, and blaming the germs.