Would be funny if Winamp gets a second life ~20 later.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    11 months ago

    It doesn’t say what license they are going to use, so it may not be open source. The wording is very weaselly.

    • monobot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is news from September and linked blog post from December. Nothing happened.

      • Xabis
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Winamp has announced that on 24 September 2024, the application’s source code will be open to developers worldwide.

        The date is given on the page, which hasn’t lapsed yet.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          11 months ago

          They’re probably spending intervening 10 months cleaning all the embarrassing comments out of the code before the initial commit.

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      IMHO, it sounds like it’ll be “Source Available.” Especially

      Winamp will remain the owner of the software and will decide on the innovations made in the official version.

      • KISSmyOSFeddit
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Would this allow a fork under a different name or would it have to be rewritten, replacing all original code, like Unix?

        • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          If they chose an open source license, a fork under a different name would be possible (else it’s not open source).

          Their wording is ambiguous, so maybe they only talk about keeping the name/trademark to themselves, which is definitely a good choice.

          It’s also not clear if they accept contributions, but they’ll likely keep deciding what features should get added or not.

          At least that’s how I understand it.

  • ace_garp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    11 months ago

    Audacious is already an open-source audio-player, that can display these 98,000 .wsz Winamp Classic skins, today.

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    With this initiative to open the source code,

    The wording is quite evasive. They didn’t say directly “With this initiative to open source” but “to open the source code.” They do however mentioned collaboration and contribution.

    I’m quite confused what license they would use.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      I would love Winamp on Linux. I just switched off Windows this year and I haven’t been able to find a media player I liked yet. I haven’t tried qmmp though.

        • Lost_My_Mind
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I want that winamp, as an android app, that doesn’t spy or send data to 3rd parties. Look how llama whipping it is!

      • WorseDoughnut 🍩@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It was honestly the one thing I still have never found a feature parity Linux alt for after years; it will always bug me no matter what other “it’s basically the same” suggested player I use instead.

        That said, currently I’m making do with Quodlibet, and I have no major complaints. But nothing is an exact replica enough for me not to constantly compare it to Wimamp & complain.

  • Yerbouti@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    If I’m correct Justin sold WinAmp and then created Reaper AKA the best DAW ever made.

  • xcjs@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    Now the question is - are they open sourcing the original Winamp, or the awful replacement?

    • Spider2013
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Does Winamp play videos? I can’t remember right now, but ppl could implement if it doesn’t, right ? I miss the old 2.x skins and the playlist and the plugins

      • biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I have a feeling it did because I remember watching early rtsp multicast streams of the anime initial D found through winamp in like 1999 at 240p. It’s so long ago that I’m not even sure that’s a correct memory.

      • Psythik
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Early Winamp user* and active forum member circa 2000-2005 here, IIRC Winamp cold play videos since around version 3, which came out in 2002.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      There isn’t much point of that, XMMS was basically that — a faithful reproduction of Winamp for Linux between 1997-2007. Since then there’s been a ton of forks — XMMS2, BMP, Youki, Audacious etc.

      Audacious is still around, sort of (last release a year ago) and it’s basically Winamp, it can use Winamp skins and has plugins.

      • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        XMMS! I was trying to remember what I started using when I switched to Linux. Couldn’t leave my favourite theme behind. Thanks!

      • Peffse
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Any of them compatible with Winamp plugins? Because that’s my reason for sticking to the past.