Biden’s and Trump’s records show sharp differences in what types of judges they would choose. And the winner of the fall election could appoint more Supreme Court justices.

The Democratic-led Senate is poised to confirm President Joe Biden’s 200th federal judge Wednesday, a milestone that highlights a sharp contrast with his election rival, Republican former President Donald Trump, as they seek to shape the courts over the next four years.

It’s unclear whether Biden will catch up to the 234 judges Trump secured in his presidential term. But the winners of the presidency and the Senate majority will have the power to shape the courts for the next few years, and the two men have dramatically different criteria in choosing nominees.

Whoever occupies the White House in the next term could even pick one or more new Supreme Court justices, which could shift or entrench the current 6-3 conservative majority. By the time the winner is sworn in, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas will be 76 and conservative Justice Samuel Alito will be 74. The next oldest member of the court is liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who will be 70. Chief Justice John Roberts will turn 70 a week after the swearing-in.

    • @disguy_ovahea
      link
      161 month ago

      Hold your nose if you have to. I know I did when I voted for Hillary.

      • @Got_Bent
        link
        71 month ago

        I literally took a picture of myself holding my nose in the 2016 election. Voted for Hilary. Didn’t want to, but it was by far the better option.

      • @captainlezbian
        link
        11 month ago

        And don’t worry, these Dems will cause the crisis of capitalism too. Just without killing the communists like the republicans may attempt to

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 month ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In 2022, Biden picked Ketanji Brown Jackson, a former public defender, to be the first Black woman on the Supreme Court; she has since become a reliable member of the liberal bloc.

    “I faced down vile attacks from the radical left to confirm three great Supreme Court justices: Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.

    On the priority list for Democrats is Supreme Court ethics legislation, a cause fueled this week by reports that an upside-down American flag flew outside Alito’s home days after the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, when rioters brandished the symbol to try to overturn the 2020 election result and keep Trump in power.

    It commissioned a national poll taken by the Democratic firm Hart Research Associates, first shared with NBC News, which found overwhelming support for term limits for justices.

    A White House spokesperson noted that Biden has endorsed Supreme Court ethics and transparency legislation but didn’t comment on whether he favors term limits for justices.

    I’ve got enough sources of anxiety and sadness,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. “It’s a frightening thought, because obviously a number of them could resign at any time to make way for the next wave of far-right MAGA judges — who are not really justices, just politicians in robes.”


    The original article contains 1,188 words, the summary contains 212 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @givesomefucks
    link
    English
    -351 month ago

    Don’t be excited about just a number of judges.

    Biden is significantly more conservative than the Dem voter base, and has an unhealthy obsession with “compromising” with republicans and trying to appointment people who think both parties have valid points.

    That’s not how you fight fascism and religious extremists.

    I can assure you his picks and trump’s picks are going to agree on stuff, especially when it’s about what the wealthy and/or corporations can do to regular citizens

    • HubertManne
      link
      fedilink
      201 month ago

      I mean im excited its not 200 more trump picks rather than 200 picks that might agree with trump picks based on a belief in how the picks were made.

      • @anticolonialist
        link
        -71 month ago

        What does it matter who trump picked when Schumer helped fast track most of them.

        • HubertManne
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          I think selection matters a lot. I totally don’t mind fast tracking the next ruth bader ginsburg.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah, I think the only take away is that they’re not Trump sycophants like Aileen Cannon.

      It’s not quite the needed win, but it’s still something :/

      • @givesomefucks
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        It’s enough to be better than a trump pick, but nothing we should celebrate.

        We’re just losing less than we would have.

        Which isn’t a viable long term strategy. But it’s been our only choice in over a decade in elections.

        Eventually, we need to start fucking winning at least half the time

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          Right? It’s fuckin wild to me that this appears to be the entire dem strategy in the face of immanent fascism.

          • @Carrolade
            link
            English
            21 month ago

            It’s really not that wild. You win elections by appealing to voters. You could take a gamble that you can inspire the younger generations enough to vote in larger numbers, or you could try to appeal to existing older swing voters. You can’t always do both simultaneously though.

            • @Viking_Hippie
              link
              21 month ago

              You win elections by appealing to voters

              That’s WHY it’s wild! The Dem leadership is alienating tens if not over a HUNDRED million prospective voters in order to keep courting the ever-shrinking “undecided who’s almost a Republican” group that might be as little as a few million now as they keep dying or joining the fascist party.

              • @Carrolade
                link
                English
                21 month ago

                I guess I’ve just seen it enough times that it is no longer wild to me. It just looks like typical cold calculus and risk-averse behavior.

                • @Viking_Hippie
                  link
                  11 month ago

                  I get what you’re saying, but I disagree: every time they run another election as if it’s still 1992, that becomes a crazier thing to do than it was the last time.

                  ESPECIALLY now that the GOP has become a literal fascist party, meaning that the Dem leadership are courting very far right people while insisting that they perfectly represent EVERYONE whose ideals and policy preferences are to the left of fascism, which is roughly 250m people, children and nonvoting adults included.

      • blargerer
        link
        fedilink
        211 month ago

        I feel like you all like to invent people to pretend you’ve upset. I don’t really consider myself a lib, but in classic left fashion, people to the left of me will call me one. The only time I start downvoting stuff about Biden is when its clearly false or its people saying they aren’t going to vote (or worse, will vote for trump). Frankly I think most of those people are likely fake. You want to point out bad stuff about Biden, please do. You want to push him on issues, please do. You want to fight grassroots for better elected officials where you can get them in, please do. Just don’t lie and don’t decide to give up on the idea of governance all together (see accelerationism).

        • @eltrain123
          link
          3
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Agreed.

          …and where you are unhappy with Biden’s policy, look to see what Trump’s policy would be. If it’s not better, for instance the US policy on Israel/Gaza, don’t use that as a reason to not vote. Protest and let your elected officials know how you feel, vote in every election all the way down to school board levels, and try to change who is in all of the supporting roles in an administration if you are unhappy with them, but don’t abstain. Apathy is better for regressive candidates than progressive candidates.

          Government is a ‘big ship’; and, it takes a long time to turn the direction it’s moving. Republicans are far better at playing the long game; and, we are reaping what they’ve been sowing since the Southern Strategy started under the Nixon administration and was the driving force under the Reagan administration.

          If you don’t like what our government has become, you are working against a 40-50 year track record that put us here.

      • snownyte
        link
        fedilink
        41 month ago

        Conservative users are so easy to spot…

        We don’t need anymore of your kind. You’re a lost cause.