• theprogressivist
    link
    8925 days ago

    You motherfuckers haven’t done shit about Jared Kushner recieving 2 billions from the Saudis. When the fuck is that happening?

    • @disguy_ovahea
      link
      2925 days ago

      They need to find an action by Kushner, while in position, that directly benefited the Saudis before they can charge him. We all know of the compensation, so I’m assuming they haven’t found the “quid” in the quid pro quo yet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1225 days ago

        It’s probably all those missing top secret files. But Trumps judge is never gonna let that see the light of day.

      • theprogressivist
        link
        1025 days ago

        Even without the “quid” he was the former Senior Advisor who accepted foreign cash. That should scream red flags alone.

        • @disguy_ovahea
          link
          425 days ago

          It already has. Accepting money after leaving office is not a crime on its own. I’m not saying he’s innocent, just that they need proof of a crime to charge him.

          • theprogressivist
            link
            525 days ago

            Most def. I just guess I’m frustrated that this shit weasel has been getting away with this for all this time.

  • @anticolonialist
    link
    37
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    With a built in exception for AIPAC. This is nothing but some and mirrors, if Democrats were serious they would have used the Emoluments Clause when they tried to impeach him

  • @Fedizen
    link
    2825 days ago

    its stupid this isnt a law already

  • @Feathercrown
    link
    English
    2425 days ago

    Can’t wait to see the Republicans stammer trying to explain why they voted no on this one

    • @blazera
      link
      English
      1825 days ago

      Thats easy, they just wont. The press aint gonna press them about it or anything

    • theprogressivist
      link
      925 days ago

      I’m sure they’ll claim it’s some sort of freedom of speech violation or some bs that their base will eat up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        725 days ago

        No, their “news” outlets just don’t cover it. They keep busy with fear lingering about anti-woke, cancel cultures, and Chinese immigrants in the Darian gap.

    • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
      cake
      link
      524 days ago

      You might be surprised how many Dems push back on this too. Still pisses me off how Pelosi wouldn’t support banning stock trades.

      • @Feathercrown
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        Yeah, every once in a while I’m reminded that even the generally good side does shitty things. I want to be excited to vote for people, not be required to do it to prevent an apocalypse. This sucks.

  • ObliviousEnlightenment
    link
    1425 days ago

    Ban gifts and job offers too. In fact, let’s make force any and all politicians to live on nothing but a pension forever, remove any incentive for corrupt people to be there