• theprogressivist
    link
    897 months ago

    You motherfuckers haven’t done shit about Jared Kushner recieving 2 billions from the Saudis. When the fuck is that happening?

    • @disguy_ovahea
      link
      297 months ago

      They need to find an action by Kushner, while in position, that directly benefited the Saudis before they can charge him. We all know of the compensation, so I’m assuming they haven’t found the “quid” in the quid pro quo yet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        127 months ago

        It’s probably all those missing top secret files. But Trumps judge is never gonna let that see the light of day.

      • theprogressivist
        link
        107 months ago

        Even without the “quid” he was the former Senior Advisor who accepted foreign cash. That should scream red flags alone.

        • @disguy_ovahea
          link
          47 months ago

          It already has. Accepting money after leaving office is not a crime on its own. I’m not saying he’s innocent, just that they need proof of a crime to charge him.

          • theprogressivist
            link
            57 months ago

            Most def. I just guess I’m frustrated that this shit weasel has been getting away with this for all this time.

  • @anticolonialist
    link
    37
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    With a built in exception for AIPAC. This is nothing but some and mirrors, if Democrats were serious they would have used the Emoluments Clause when they tried to impeach him

  • @Fedizen
    link
    287 months ago

    its stupid this isnt a law already

  • @Feathercrown
    link
    English
    247 months ago

    Can’t wait to see the Republicans stammer trying to explain why they voted no on this one

    • @blazera
      link
      English
      187 months ago

      Thats easy, they just wont. The press aint gonna press them about it or anything

    • theprogressivist
      link
      97 months ago

      I’m sure they’ll claim it’s some sort of freedom of speech violation or some bs that their base will eat up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        77 months ago

        No, their “news” outlets just don’t cover it. They keep busy with fear lingering about anti-woke, cancel cultures, and Chinese immigrants in the Darian gap.

    • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
      link
      57 months ago

      You might be surprised how many Dems push back on this too. Still pisses me off how Pelosi wouldn’t support banning stock trades.

      • @Feathercrown
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yeah, every once in a while I’m reminded that even the generally good side does shitty things. I want to be excited to vote for people, not be required to do it to prevent an apocalypse. This sucks.

  • ObliviousEnlightenment
    link
    147 months ago

    Ban gifts and job offers too. In fact, let’s make force any and all politicians to live on nothing but a pension forever, remove any incentive for corrupt people to be there