• @Bookmeat
    link
    276 months ago

    This is what tipped me over the edge to run Linux on the desktop full time. Bye bye, Microsoft!

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      English
      156 months ago

      Anything is legal when you force the customer to agree to it or not use your product. They can say whatever they want in the ToS because it’s 365 pages long and only attorneys can understand what is actually being said.

      • @efstajas
        link
        -6
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        You can turn this feature off without any problems.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          166 months ago

          And based on their track record, they will just quietly turn it back on.

          Microsoft is so far beyond the benefit of the doubt they couldn’t get back to it if they tried.

          • @efstajas
            link
            2
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Are there actually any documented cases of them just enabling userland features after they’ve been disabled? The only thing I heard of before was registry edits / telemetry changes being undone. Not to say that that’s cool of course, but at least it’s not like it asks you for your privacy settings during startup and then undoes your choices. As far as I know, maybe I’m just out of the loop.

            Generally though, what do you think would actually be Microsoft’s motivation to randomly re-enable this particular feature? Do you think that the claim that the data doesn’t leave the device is a lie?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              66 months ago

              Does it get much worse than telemetry settings being quietly enabled? It’s spyware at the best of times, much less when they get all sneaky about it. And I’ve definitely had them change privacy/telemetry options that I set on startup, multiple times.

              I don’t necessarily think they’re stupid enough to come out with the full data harvesting machine on day one. They’ll release what they can get away with - in this case, taking screenshots and storing them locally - and they’ll boil the metaphorical frog from there. Maybe they offer more powerful AI by running it through their servers, and then they can start “accidentally” opting people into that “service”.

              I’m not even necessarily saying there’s some grand scheme going on here, but nobody can possibly deny they have every incentive to push that boundary until it breaks, and they have consistently shown that they will pursue that incentive without any regard for user privacy whatsoever.

              We know this because they have done it so many times before.

    • ekZeppOP
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Something tells me they’ll need to do some fix in the EU version and who knows how Cina will react. We’ll see.

      • @efstajas
        link
        36 months ago

        The feature as advertised would be completely fine in the EU because none of the data leaves the device.

    • stankmut
      link
      English
      36 months ago

      The feature as advertised would be legal, since they are claiming it’ll only be stored and processed locally.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        26 months ago

        Darth Stiffneckedppl could detect the clever movie references of others, but could not get other people to recognize his in turn.

        Ironic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      I’ve been thinking about all of these major companies sending data by default and how this can’t be good for government contractors and the like.

      I imagine accidentally (or someone who doesn’t know any better purposely) clicking an AI assist option and sending military or aerospace prints or medical records to an outside party. I know Adobe Reader has this built in now. How long before they’re processing classified documents?

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        English
        26 months ago

        There have already been issues with HIPPA violations due to pretty much all software being spyware now.

      • @ZapBeebz_
        link
        16 months ago

        There’s a reason large parts of the government are still running Windows 10/Office 2016, with all the cloud features disabled. This shit is absolutely not secure enough to meet national security standards.

        • @Mirshe
          link
          16 months ago

          Some are even still running XP if it’s airgapped from the internet.

        • @LesserAbe
          link
          16 months ago

          It won’t even be able to run on most current computers. They’re planning to sell “ai ready” badged devices that have special graphics chips for AI specifically.

        • @efstajas
          link
          -16 months ago

          It’s not. It asks during setup.

      • @demizerone
        link
        36 months ago

        And Microsoft will eventually release an update that resets to the default enabled state.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36 months ago

    at this point i believe that MS is using the FOSS/gaming enthusiast community as free marketing. perfect ragebait content to get people talking about their product and this entire platform is playing right into it.

    • ekZeppOP
      link
      English
      156 months ago

      Quite a shitty marketing if i may say so.

        • @LesserAbe
          link
          76 months ago

          I get the spirit of the saying, but sometimes there is. May not put an end to a business, but certainly there are consequences. Look at Tesla, Boeing.

        • ekZeppOP
          link
          English
          4
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I mean, lots of people are staying on win10 because of the shit-wagon 11 already is. From the retro-compatibility issues to the idiotic Adds ecc. Now they’re literally saying that the whole OS will spy both on the “contents” and the “usage” of the users… Honestly either they overestimate their AI services or the think that most of people are just too stupid to realize the level of shit they are forcing on them.

          • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
            link
            English
            26 months ago

            or the think that most of people are just too stupid to realize the level of shit they are forcing on them.

            Most people don’t care, many are too stupid, and those that aren’t are already on other platforms.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            26 months ago

            either they overestimate their AI services or the think that most of people are just too stupid to realize the level of shit they are forcing on them.

            I don’t count it as stupidity so much as most people don’t keep up on this sort of stuff. It’ll be installed in their OS and they don’t know any better that all that data is being processed by M$.

  • ekZeppOP
    link
    English
    26 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • @UnderpantsWeevil
    link
    16 months ago

    All this could have been solved if you’d simply invested more money in Bored Apes.