If you are looking to help bail water, @[email protected] recommend Mobilize.us to find opportunities to get started. We are all in this boat together.

  • @WhatIsThePointAnyway
    link
    33
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    So what’s the plan to change it? All I have heard proposed is don’t vote or vote third party. No third party is remotely close to having a real shot in the near term. I am disappointed in Biden on some things like Palestine, but what are my options in the near term? We need to build a progressive grass roots party but that takes time, money, and a lot of work no one seems to want to do. Protests are a path but not one that seems to be making enough impact. I hear so much negativity like this but it seems to all point towards options that won’t fix the issue. Getting Trump back will set back progressive movements drastically with the rights hold on the courts and the house. Biden has done some compromise to the left at least. We need a real path to change and it’s got to be a long term plan because democracies move slowly.

      • @WhatIsThePointAnyway
        link
        166 months ago

        This is good. I wish more people pushed stuff like this instead of just throwing up their hands about the whole system.

    • @PopOfAfrica
      link
      9
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I get the people are too nervous to do it this election cycle, but the real answer is to create an organized movement in which you explicitly tell Democrats they will not get your votes unless they change course.

      Let’s say that this movement occurs within the next four years and not during this election cycle. If they genuinely want to win, they will have to capitulate. We just need to give them enough time in advance and the make clear concise demands.

    • @Ellvix
      link
      66 months ago

      Changing the voting system would do a lot. First Past the Post sort of locks in a 2 party only matchup, and if we move to a better system (ranked choice, star, etc), third party candidates would be a real option and we could start to make those changes you want. As always, it starts local, some places are doing it already, we just need to keep expanding.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      All I have heard proposed is don’t vote or vote third party.

      This is how the Conservatives ensure they can keep drilling holes. All research points to vote-splitting or abstaining as helping the cons, since a hallmark of their culture is loyalty over all.

    • Liz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      Join up withElection Science and switch your elections to Approval Voting. That’s the first step. Approval means it’s always safe to vote for your favorite, so third parties will start to see their true level of support in elections with approval voting.

      But, if we leave it there we won’t get more than a few extra third party candidates in office because single-winner elections always force two-party dominance. So once we get enough elections switched to approval, we go to multi-winner elections in legislative districts and use Sequential Proportional Approval Voting. Which is just the multi-winner version.

      Approval is a very easy switch. If your election commission can do at-large elections (practically guaranteed) then they can do approval elections just by setting the selection limit to the number is candidates in the race.

      Let me know if you want to know more. Running a referendum campaign is a lot of work and massively rewarding. It’s the kind of “bigger than yourself” project that really makes people love their community.

    • @Broken_Monitor
      link
      -16 months ago

      Get angry and boot these fucks out of the boat. Voting doesnt work but open revolt might.

  • @Feathercrown
    link
    English
    246 months ago

    Hey look, I can make it say whatever I want too! This proves my viewpoint, I will take no further questions.

    • @SquirtleHermitOP
      link
      5
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Did you have further questions?

      Or is it enough to say that I was just sharing what could very generously be called art to express my point of view and hoped that it resonated with folk and would prompt discussion that might be in it’s own small way a part of the change I hope to see?

    • @buttPickle
      link
      46 months ago

      Yeah but yours isn’t correct as OP’s was

    • @wafflez
      link
      16 months ago

      Conflating leftists with democrats?

  • @Bytemeister
    link
    Ελληνικά
    18
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Meme is missing another citizen not bailing and saying “just vote for someone else” and then a body floating face down in the water that says “3rd party candidates”.

    Oh and approximately 2 more citizens dumping buckets of water back in the boat, screaming about how their rights to drill holes come from god and that the people bailing water are what is really wrong with the whole boat.

    • @SquirtleHermitOP
      link
      66 months ago

      If only my artistic skills went beyond adding text to stolen borrowed images.

  • @lewdian69
    link
    156 months ago

    Now THIS is an accurate meme

    • @SquirtleHermitOP
      link
      66 months ago

      Certainly don’t want him to be Captain (or near sharp objects for that matter).

  • @Zehzin
    link
    13
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Except the two on the top are in a yatch playing golf

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      146 months ago

      Found the yacht.

        • Liz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          Extremely AI, that image is.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          16 months ago

          I know what you mean, but it was from a “gawk at rich people” site. 50/50 odds it was at least pitched to some rich fuck.

      • @Viking_Hippie
        link
        26 months ago

        Nah, most of them are far too rich for the system they built to let them suffer any real hardships.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          The collapse of global society amidst climate change is not something they can be safe from.

          • @Viking_Hippie
            link
            -36 months ago

            They absolutely can. When you’re a hectomillionaire or richer or good enough friends with one, you don’t depend on a functional society to be safe. They made sure of that.

            A man with a hundred million dollars in 1990s Mogadishu would be safer than a man with a hundred thousand dollars in 2020s Milwaukee.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              A man with a hundred million dollars in 2060 is worth the same as a man with 0 dollars, because once global society collapses so do your dollars.

              These geniuses think they can escape to their bunkers and keep their security forces loyal to them. That won’t happen, the people with the guns will take the land and the resources and leave the billionaires dead.

              • @Viking_Hippie
                link
                16 months ago

                A man with a hundred million dollars in 2060 is worth the same as a man with 0 dollars, because once global society collapses so do your dollars

                Nah, they’ll have ways around that such as alternate currencies or converting their money to gold or other valuable commodities.

                They’re already own or are increasingly owning all sources of food, fresh water, large scale power generation and fuel.

                Also, you’re REALLY underestimating how much the people with the most guns love following authoritarian leaders unquestioningly. Blind obedience of authority figures is one of the cornerstones of their religion, after all…

                • @Bobmighty
                  link
                  36 months ago

                  The food is going to be among the first things to fall. The climate will make growing large amounts of crops increasingly difficult, regardless of money thrown at the problem. Once food becomes globally insecure, the rich will be worldwide targets. The rich are not escaping the hell that’s coming. Their wealth will help them suffer it a little longer than the rest of us though. No one is getting out of this. Money can’t buy off extinction.

    • @SquirtleHermitOP
      link
      -16 months ago

      Ignore the guy with the drill, he’s just a Shark Week fan.

      More importantly, have you heard about the shit going down in Palestine!?

  • @PugJesus
    link
    English
    66 months ago

    You aren’t wrong.

    • @SquirtleHermitOP
      link
      16 months ago

      The real tragedy to me is neither one of us are. Weird time to say it, but I appreciate your consistency in making posts that push for a better future.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      236 months ago

      I mean, those guys with the buckets sure are trying something, taking direct action to avoid disaster.

    • @SquirtleHermitOP
      link
      226 months ago

      On the contrary, it all matters. Try like hell, go down kicking and screaming, vote for Biden if only to prevent more holes from being drilled, push for class consciousness and solidarity, get organized, get involved, and bail water like crazy.

      Just don’t mistake where you are in this image, and don’t mistake the Dems for allies, they are at best a useful tool.

        • @SquirtleHermitOP
          link
          21
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Besides complaining on the Internet?

          I spend my available volunteer time assisting a local homeless shelter, and I donate roughly 3% of my income on supporting groups that I believe do good. Much less than I’d like, but I believe every bit helps.

          Also I complain on the Internet.

          • @teodor_from_achewood
            link
            -116 months ago

            That’s nice.

            It won’t result in passing new laws, new executive actions, or a better judiciary though.

            • @SquirtleHermitOP
              link
              5
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Your not wrong (well I kinda hope my donations help on those fronts or I’m throwing away money¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ ), and focusing on the big political goals is extremely important. But I’ve got my own battles to face and I do what I can with the time I’ve got.

              But I fully appreciate folks like you who are at the front lines of these issues! I checked out the mobilize.us site you recommend, and it seems like a good way for folks to get involved if they don’t know where to start. If you don’t mind, I’d like to add it as a recommendation to the text of the meme.

            • @mmcintyre
              link
              36 months ago

              That’s nice.

              But according to the meme, citizens ain’t boatwrights, they’re bailers. Those things you mentioned would be more fixing the boat than bailing it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      156 months ago

      I mean, even in this comic, one is clearly worse, if we’re forced to choose one person to push off the boat to distract the sharks any reasonable person knows who to push. Another thing that rings true about it is that regular people are the ones who end up really putting the work in to prevent disaster.

  • @Brkdncr
    link
    46 months ago

    Can we get a huge yacht with a piss stream coming from off screen and landing in the boat?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    26 months ago

    If you’re getting tired of grabbing buckets, see if you can get people to stop endorsing drillers.