In March 2023, a recruiter for Arthur Grand Technologies posted a job advertisement looking for ‘US Born Citizens [white] who are local within 60 miles from Dallas, TX [Don’t share with candidates]’

A tech company in Virginia has been fined thousands of dollars by the Justice Department over a job advert seeking “whites only” candidates.

In March 2023, a recruiter for Arthur Grand Technologies, an information technology services firm based in Ashburn, posted a job advertisement on the recruitment website Indeed for a business analyst for the company’s sales and insurance claims team.

The job posting said that the company was looking for “US Born Citizens [white] who are local within 60 miles from Dallas, TX [Don’t share with candidates]”, according to the DOJ.

  • andyburke
    link
    fedilink
    1846 months ago

    Fined less than $40k. Great, problem fixed, everyone!

    • @pigup
      link
      46 months ago

      Racism removal only costs 40k? Perhaps we can get a loan.

    • @VelvetStorm
      link
      36 months ago

      It did say it had to pay that 31k to everyone who complained to the dept of labor. Now I take that as 31k per person, so if I am correct and that’s a big if that could be a good chunk of money. All that being said, it’s not enough.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    177
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Meanwhile, the company denied it had approved the posting and blamed a disgruntled employee working for its subsidiary in India.

    “It wasn’t our fault, it was the dark-skinned guy’s fault” is an interesting way to try to excuse your white racism…

    • @grue
      link
      English
      436 months ago

      Considering it said “[Don’t share with candidates]” and allegedly the Indian employee is the one who shared it with candidates, I think I can guess what he was righteously “disgruntled” about!

      • Flying Squid
        link
        236 months ago

        Even if the guy happily posted the ad, that is the most tone-deaf way they could have responded to this. Even just coming out and saying, “yep, we meant whites only when we said whites only” would have been less tone-deaf.

  • @grue
    link
    English
    110
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    “Thousands of dollars” in fines is orders of magnitude too low.

    Edit: also, what the actual fuck:

    Under the arrangement, Arthur Grand will pay a civil penalty of $7,500, along with a total of $31,000 to 31 people who complained about the posting. The company — which is minority-owned and a federal contractor designated a disadvantaged business — will also be monitored to ensure compliance with anti-discrimination laws.

    That company should’ve instantly lost those “disadvantaged business” and “Federal contractor” designations permanently!

  • @DaddleDew
    link
    606 months ago

    Only fined? Whoever made that requirement is going to continue causing damage. This person should be banned from any management position or position where they have power over other people.

    • @orclev
      link
      256 months ago

      Company should be banned. Nobody should do business with them anymore.

    • @owenfromcanada
      link
      English
      166 months ago

      The company should have lost its business license and had its IP released to the public domain. Someone might actually care.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    366 months ago

    Can we please:

    A) stop allowing companies to settle with the “while not admitting any wrong doing”

    B) stop fining companies finger slaps, not even hand slaps? Make fines depend on their annual revenue and see how fast they’ll behave

    C) start requiring companies to divulge the parson who is the source of said wrong doing, and the person who signed off on wrong doing, and prosecute these persons also individually from the company, criminally if need be

    This way, companies will start behaving a lot faster, or, you know, at all.

    Right now you know that this company will still hire a white dude even though they’re not saying it again in the ad.

    • @Maggoty
      link
      66 months ago

      Sir that would mean rich people would be held accountable and we just can’t have that kind of talk around here

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        36 months ago

        You can’t have negative revenue, revenue is only a measure of income, before costs are pulled out.even if you only sold $1 worth of product, and spent 200billion to do so you still have a revenue of $1

  • @ChonkyOwlbear
    link
    366 months ago

    When Republicans talk about free speech, this is what they mean.

  • nkat2112
    link
    fedilink
    English
    346 months ago

    The fine is pathetically low. And that needs to be fixed.

    However, the name “Arthur Grand Technologies” will always be synonymous to racism. They dug their own grave.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 months ago

      However, the name “Arthur Grand Technologies” will always be synonymous to racism.

      For now. This will be memory-holed in a couple weeks. A couple grand is nothing, maybe just a slightly down quarter. They should have been completely annihilated. Crimes like this shouldn’t be fixed dollar amounts; it should be percentages of average annual gross earnings, and in this case, something like 300% annual gross earnings. Let them sell everything off.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
    link
    fedilink
    English
    276 months ago

    You can’t post that. Racism at work is illegal.

    What happens if we’re racist at work?

    You get fined.

    So, legal, but just not for free.

    -__________-

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    176 months ago

    We can’t even hire WHITE PEOPLE now? I TOLD YOU Whites were being hated just because of our SKIN COLOR! And I’m TOTALLY NOT RACIST!

    • @Illegalmexicant
      link
      46 months ago

      I feel you man. It’s this WOKE guvment and this CANCEL culture. I make observations AND conclusions and now I’m RACIST? I’m just lucky I’m on disability.

  • @UncleGrandPa
    link
    166 months ago

    As usual they never admitted wrongdoing… And the person in charge who made the decision was not identified or dealt with…So they’ll do it again if they think they can get away with it

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    166 months ago

    This company simply said the quiet part out loud. Without that whites only requirement, they would have only hired whites anyways.

    • Bakkoda
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Who wants to start a lawsuit trolling company where we scrape, ingest and search for anything we can sue for discrimination and donate as much of the proceeds to charity of a competing viewpoint as we possibly can?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      Since they did say it out loud…Let it be known that Arthur Grand Technologies has racist hiring practices.

      Maybe if Arthur Grand Technologies didn’t want their brand associated with racism they shouldn’t have told recruiters to hire only white people.

  • @UnderpantsWeevil
    link
    106 months ago

    Rookie mistake. You’re not supposed to say the quiet part out loud.

  • Noxy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    96 months ago

    apparently racism is acceptable to the DOJ as long as the $38,500 premium racist tier is unlocked

    I get that DOJ/DOL may be unable to fine more than they did here because of case law or statutes or whatever the fuck, but it doesn’t change the fact that penalties like this are far too small to truly function as penalties