• @atmur
    link
    English
    1227 months ago

    Watching live service games crash and burn is just so cathartic.

  • @Potatos_are_not_friendsOP
    link
    English
    707 months ago

    Steam puts the player peak for the episode release at just 559 players, and it’s down to peaking under 500 even on the weekend here.

    • @FinishingDutch
      link
      English
      307 months ago

      When you can pack the peak amount of players into a decent sized ballroom, that’s never a good sign for your game’s future.

      At this point they’re probably better off just refunding buyers and shuttering the game entirely. Doesn’t feel like this is a salvageable situation.

    • @ampersandrew
      link
      English
      0
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Not until Helldivers 2 dies too. I was tricked into thinking it was healing, and then that game exploded.

      EDIT: The truth hurts, but that’s still a live service game that’s actively working against the interests of consumers and preservationists. The more money and playtime people give it, the worse this situation gets.

      • @Katana314
        link
        English
        257 months ago

        I still don’t think the enemy is “all live service games” exactly. A lot of us have a style of gameplay we enjoy that makes us go “That was fun! I want some more of it.”

        Just that Rocksteady made singleplayer games well, and their poor shift just informs us that not all games need to be live service, especially when the gameplay shifts to something no one likes in order to achieve Number Go Up (similar situation with Gotham Knights)

        • @ampersandrew
          link
          English
          117 months ago

          Number can go up without being tied to a server you don’t and can’t control. Those games still get made, from Titan Quest to Borderlands. Nothing about the gameplay loop of Helldivers offends me; the totally unnecessary forced obsolescence does. The thing that makes it a live service game is the thing that makes it incompatible with surviving for more than a few years without an Act of God, like Knockout City. I also hate that people have been trained into differentiating “single player” and “live service”, as though multiplayer must inherently be this way when it doesn’t have to be. A live service game is just an inferior version of a game they could have made that would survive offline, because it’s tied to their servers. Do you think Sony could have mandated a PSN account after the point of sale if it was available DRM-free and allowed you to run your own servers?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            There is some hope for these games. For example Shadow of War works perfectly fine now and doesn’t have any of it’s “battle pass” stuff in it anymore. It can happen.
            Rarely.

            • @ampersandrew
              link
              English
              27 months ago

              If Helldivers 2 gets updated to work offline, including multiplayer, I will no longer wish for its death. I just don’t think that’s at all likely.

  • @BroBot9000
    link
    English
    247 months ago

    Any numbers in on how much money they lost?

    • MrScottyTay
      link
      fedilink
      English
      237 months ago

      Considering what companies that make live services target for… They’ll chalk this up as a loss at the amount of All of the money in the world.

    • @ampersandrew
      link
      English
      137 months ago

      Approximately $200M, but you can get creative with accounting across multiple products, the way they phrased it.

  • DrSleepless
    link
    English
    137 months ago

    TIL you can update poop

  • @Whirling_Cloudburst
    link
    English
    37 months ago

    It was so bad that many of them decided to finally touch grass.