Dear Admins and Users of lemmy.world,

I am writing to express my concerns about the impact of lemmy.ml on our community. It has come to my attention that lemmy.ml frequently disseminates propaganda and engages in historical revisionism. Moreover, there have been instances where their admin privileges were used to suppress dissenting views, reminiscent of the already defederated lemmygrad instance.

While personal blocking of lemmy.ml is an option, it does not address the broader issue of new users potentially being influenced by misleading content. It is crucial that we protect our users from a continuous stream of biased information.

To illustrate these concerns, I have provided a link to a detailed post on the Fediverse that documents these issues comprehensively [Here].

Given these points, I urge the admins to consider a defederation from lemmy.ml. If their users wish to remain part of Lemmy.ml, that is entirely acceptable, but we should take steps to prevent the propagation of harmful misinformation, especially in their comment sections.

Thank you for your consideration.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
    link
    English
    447 months ago

    Not only are they heavily censoring content and comments, they do it at the database level so there’s no mod log of the events, and users are unaware that their content has been removed.

    • DefederateLemmyMl
      link
      fedilink
      20
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You can still see that your comment has been removed, but you can’t see the biased mass removals of content, like mass purging all China critical comments from a post, unless you’re quick enough to screenshot the modlog.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        English
        187 months ago

        They’re purging the modlog somehow. I received a message from an admin of another instance who let me know that he happened to see my comment disappear, but he couldn’t figure out how it was removed because there was no record of it. When I went back to the comment to check, it looked like it was still there to me. So, I’m not sure exactly what they’re doing, but they’re doing something funky.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          I had the same thing happen. The comment was clearly removed and I could not see my comments from another account, but no modlog entries existed.

    • DefederateLemmyMl
      link
      fedilink
      237 months ago

      I believe some guy got banned from all .ml communities for posting things .ml didnt like about tianamin square.

      That was me, yes.

        • @FutileRecipe
          link
          47 months ago

          And defederating only makes it smaller, unfortunately.

            • @FutileRecipe
              link
              -17 months ago

              But is everyone there a fascist? Or just some/most admins/mods? If everyone (not just mods, but users too) or most were, sure. I’d be willing to bet that most aren’t or even know about it. Defederating due to what some admins and where the majority of users don’t know sounds like “throwing out the baby with the bathwater.”

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                47 months ago

                Not just the mods but the admins are using the deceptive database manipulation practices. i.e. this is not a fixable problem by merely appealing one layer up from a mod of a community - the only layer above admins is defederation from the Fediverse overall, which is what OP is advocating.

                It is a pain yes, but also it only takes 2 clicks to migrate your settings from one instance to another - go to Settings and under “Import/Export Settings” click the big Export button, then in the new click Import. With a similar iconic avatar and name, people likely won’t even notice the difference. Your old comments/posts/points won’t transfer though. Bonus: you can keep both, so while e.g. one instance is upgrading you still have another with which to read/reply/etc.

                People on lemmy.ml are going to notice a noticeably reduced functionality over the next several months regardless, as many, Many, MANY users start blocking the instance on a personal/user level even if not an instance-wide block. Imagine every single comment you write receives 10x fewer replies back, or votes, just you shouting into the void, and the only people responding back… are the fascists, and those more neutral to fascism.

                So OP is bringing up the problem, which is the first step towards healing. :-)

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                27 months ago

                “If there’s a Nazi at the table and 10 other people sitting there talking to him, you got a table with 11 Nazis.” It really is as simple as that.

                • @FutileRecipe
                  link
                  17 months ago

                  Well, I did say (emphasis added):

                  I’d be willing to bet that most aren’t or even know about it. Defederating due to what some admins and where the majority of users don’t know

                  So are they Nazis if they don’t know they’re sitting at a table with a Nazi? Of course not. That saying only works when they knowingly accept it. It really is as simple as that.

  • @Ibaudia
    link
    English
    357 months ago

    I also got banned from all communities on .ml that I had participated in after making a joke about how Tienanmen Square was like a glue trap for tankies. Really bad image for Lemmy. Considering we’re growing as a community, I don’t see why we should allow authoritarians to participate. Allowing that will just ingratiate their standards into the culture of the platform.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    107 months ago

    I absolutely agree. For the sake of the Fediverse and it’s potential to be great, cut out the malicious propaganda machine Lemmy.ml.

    • El Barto
      link
      47 months ago

      its* potential to be great.

  • @steventhedev
    link
    97 months ago

    Calling to defederate merely on the basis of political opinion might be premature. However, I suspect defederation will happen for legal reasons: they host users who openly support terrorist organizations designated as such by the EU. LW is subject to Dutch law - hosting such content is more of a gray area than CSAM, but still very much illegal in most countries.

    The reason I’m not pushing here with examples is because I have not yet contacted the mods/admins to remove said content. They may have simply not been aware and I’ll give them that chance. But even seeing that content has a chilling effect on users who would contribute - even in unrelated communities.

    • RoflmasterbigpimpOP
      link
      177 months ago

      Like in the other comment, it’s not their view on politics what is the problem. Its that they straight up lie. They try to rewrite history and deny well established facts. And if you try to call them out, they lie even more and ban you.

      • deweydecibel
        link
        English
        -5
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Who is “they”? The entire instance? Every single user in every single community on that instance You don’t think people around here spread lies too?

        Hexbear and lemmygrad were instance-wide operations. They existed for the purpose of disruption. Lemmy.ml is not that and has never been. It holds a large body of individuals who share the same beliefs, but that’s not the whole instance.

        And are we establishing a dedicated, impartial, fact checking body to evaluate everything? If not, then defederating the entire instance based on “lies”, determined by people with their own biases, is about as slippery a slope as you can possibly get.

        Besides, you keep talking about “lies” but what I see in the evidence you linked is mostly about admin actions. So let’s not punish the users of either instance for their admin, let’s open some dialogue about it.

        But the greater issue here is that the whole concept of this federated platform is basically moot the more fractured the federation becomes. If admins can’t put aside biases and commit to the idea of federation, then it isn’t going to work, and this would create the most evidence of that. I agree the admin actions over there are eyebrow raising, but the biggest instance defederating from one of the other biggest and oldest instances is cutting off our arm, their arm, while making this whole thing less useful and even more confusing for new users.

        I don’t know if there’s a good answer, here. Rogue admins in charge of massive instances is not something that can be dealt with easily. But defederating is going to cause more issues than it solves.

    • DefederateLemmyMl
      link
      fedilink
      107 months ago

      It’s not defederating on the basis of political opinion. It’s defederating on the basis of extreme intolerance towards and censorship of people who have different, non-fringe opinions that aren’t even controversial in most parts of the world.

      Right now, the instance hosts a lot of let’s say mainstream, non-political communities, purely because lemmy.ml was the first instance and so “popular” by default. The way the mods over there behave, it’s clear that they’re not suited to be a mainstream instance for these communities. Unfortunately due to network effect, people won’t just move.

      The only way to dislodge these communities and move them to more neutral instances is if larger instances like lemmy.world start defederating lemmy.ml.

      • @steventhedev
        link
        27 months ago

        Defederation is a tool of last resort. Before taking that step as a community we should attempt to engage the admins to align them towards more acceptable behavior. Migrating communities away from instances with petty and abusive admins is always a good idea, and this absolutely qualifies.

  • Kabe
    link
    English
    8
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    There are some good points here, but I think defederation should always be a last resort and especially so in this case, given that we are talking about lemmy.ml here.

    Since it was the former flagship server (in activity, at least) before LW came along, there are still many thriving, non-political communities hosted there. To cut them all off would be a net-negative to the average Lemmy user, I would argue.

    That’s not to say that I agree with the actions of the .ml admins, or think that opening a dialogue with them about moderation policies isn’t a great idea, of course; I just think it’s overall a better approach to let the individual user figure out for themselves which communities/instances they want to engage with and which ones they want to avoid.

    • RoflmasterbigpimpOP
      link
      287 months ago

      there are still many thriving, non-political communities hosted there

      And that, in fact, is my main concern with ml. They have lots of communties which are non-political for sure but, these communities come along with an assortment of lies and Propaganda. At which point the negative outweigh the positive?

      And even in the non-political Communities your comments gets censored when they are not on line with their views.

      • Kabe
        link
        English
        -7
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        but, these communities come along with an assortment of lies and Propaganda.

        So block those individual communities that post what you consider propaganda. Hell, even block the whole instance - that option is readily available to you.

        At which point the negative outweigh the positive?

        With a server like, say, Hexbear, this would be an easy calculation. Defederate and what does the average user miss out on? Not a whole lot. On the other hand, .ml has a wide variety of technology, open source, gaming, hobby, etc. communities that don’t even touch on politics.

        I regularly visit many of them, so for me at least, it would take a lot more on the negative scale to even break even.

        • RoflmasterbigpimpOP
          link
          127 months ago

          For sure I can block them for myself (as I have mentioned in my Post itself) but this won’t solve the Problem of policing non political Communities and injecting them also with propaganda.

          • Kabe
            link
            English
            -117 months ago

            To what extent is this actually an issue? What examples do you have so far?

            • RoflmasterbigpimpOP
              link
              137 months ago

              Pardon me but have you read the Post i linked? He talked about politics, granted, but banning him from non-political Communities (in fact, ALL Communities) is completely out of proportion. And that is just for reciting established facts!

              • Kabe
                link
                English
                -10
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Yes I have, which is why I’m asking. While I agree that the admin response was totally out of all proportion, this is not evidence of either of the things you previously claimed.

                If you’re going to justify defederation based on non-political communities being policed and injected with propaganda, you need to provide some concrete examples of that happening.

                • RoflmasterbigpimpOP
                  link
                  9
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  First and for most my main reason for defederation is that they straight up lie and mislead.

                  If you demand prove I will unblock ml again and will try to find it. I would have thought that you would have seen this yourself since you seem to be more on ml than I was.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      247 months ago

      there are still many thriving, non-political communities hosted there. To cut them all off would be a net-negative to the average Lemmy user, I would argue.

      Agreed. To address this, I started this thread to see which lemmy.ml don’t have alternatives on other instances: https://lemmy.world/post/16235541

      Hopefully that can help people who want to avoid lemmy.ml.

      I guess at the end of the day, people should be able to choose whether they go to the lemmy.ml communities or the alternatives

      • Kabe
        link
        English
        87 months ago

        See, now that’s a much more positive approach. Users making informed decisions and organically migrating is much more in keeping with the Fediverse spirit than admins wielding the defederation hammer, IMO.

        • deweydecibel
          link
          English
          15
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Agreed, but let’s also be honest about this:

          The smaller, less visible alternative communities seldom grow. It’s the classic case of the biggest and oldest trees getting all the sunlight, while the saplings in their shadow are stunted.

          We saw this on Reddit, too. Alternative subreddits, usually born out of protest of the moderation on the original, popped up all the time and never grew. Some did, some even overshadowed the original, but that was rare. The algorithm and search results would always funnel visitors to the old one.

          Unless there’s an effort made to give more visibility to the smaller and less established alternative, there’s a good chance it goes nowhere.

          So in reality the user choice you’re describing is less about choosing between two communities, and more about choosing between a community or a DND group that gets together once a week, but half the people flake out anyway.

          • Kabe
            link
            English
            0
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Absolutely agree, which is why I would advocate against defederation. It’s better to let users organically migrate away from problematic moderation than for the LW admins to preemptively make the decision on everyone’s behalf.

            Lemmy is still a relatively small community, and too much defederation is only going to be detrimental to its overall health.

    • @Ibaudia
      link
      English
      117 months ago

      The non-political communities on .ml are poisoned by mods who ban users based on their political opinions they voice in other communities. If you’re critical of China, you will likely be banned from all communities on .ml, regardless of if they’re political.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        97 months ago

        They banned the Plex mod, who was doing good work, for basically nothing as far as I can tell. Effectively killed the community. Rest in peace BrooklynMan

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      77 months ago

      let the individual user figure out for themselves

      What a ton of people will figure out is that the fediverse has a serious problem with propaganda and moderation. They’ll come check out the Fediverse, see it’s full of extremist political content, and go back to Reddit.

      I’m thrilled about the potential of the Fediverse to be something great, but I won’t even tell anyone I use it in it’s current state.

      Defederating malicious propaganda instances like Lemmy.ml should be a no-brainer. It’s not “people I disagree with,” it’s a murderous authoritarian government’s tool for spreading lies.

      • Kabe
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        First impressions to new users is an important factor, I agree, but is Lemmy really “full of extremist political content”?

        Scrolling through the first 4 pages of Lemmy World today, I see no extremist content at all. All of the political posts are standard liberal/left-of-centre talking points and the only things related to .ml content are three posts complaining about tankies, off the back of the original post that made a splash yesterday.

        I can’t see anything that would be putting potential newcomers off in droves.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          Yes, you’re right. I was being facetious and that’s not helpful in this situation.

          The Fediverse is full of propaganda, but extremist content is usually limited to Hexbear, Lemmygrad, and lemmy.ml.

          Hard to forget Hexbear accounts saying they were going to murder me when they started their revolution, but that’s not a generally a problem in the rest of the Fediverse.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47 months ago

    I think dissenting views is helpful in a community, even crazy psychotic and editorialized views.

    If instances defederate just because they have different viewpoints is going to get really lonely in the fediverse.

    A more generalized rules of cooperative federation would be a better solution then doing a case by case debate. I.e.

    • Instances we federate with must have a clearly defined moderation policy at the instance level

    • Any user banning at the instance level must follow the published moderation policy

    Just the basics.

    • @ricdeh
      link
      English
      317 months ago

      It’s not so much that they have dissenting views, but rather that they throw the ban hammer around for anyone remotely suggesting that they have a really skewed perception of history and that they are actively disseminating propaganda and engaging in historical revisionism. The post that OP mentioned illustrates that very well, and those are things that have happened on .ml for months now.

      I agree about the instance level moderation policy, and I’d like for the LW team to take it up with the ML admins. But at the same time, we should seriously consider defederating in the case that they are unwilling to compromise.

      • deweydecibel
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        This is why federation should have a standard that needs to be followed. Been saying that for a year now.

        Instance level administration/moderation has an effect on the democratic system that is the backbone of the entire federation. We can choose not to federate all their actions, but it still has an effect on instance A when something isn’t visible on instance B and instance B visitors can not not vote on it. It skews the outcomes for everyone.

        So there should be a standard for federated instances to administer and moderate fairly and honestly, in line with established and public rules.

    • RoflmasterbigpimpOP
      link
      18
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s not that their views are diffrent they straight up lie. And if you call them out, you get banned from all communitys and silenced in any way possible.

    • @Ibaudia
      link
      English
      127 months ago

      They do not have a clearly defined moderation policy, they are flagrantly banning any dissenters to their political views from communities unrelated to the posts in question. Allowing them to grow more power in the space by keeping them federated with other large instances is a bad thing imo.

    • @barsquid
      link
      77 months ago

      No, crazy psychotic views are not helpful to a community.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    37 months ago

    I’m with roflmasterbigpimp here because I mean look, strongly-worded letter format

    This guy fucks

  • Alice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -7
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Ok so I’m no one here and not on the .world team.

    So don’t take what I’m saying personally or anything bc I’m not meaning it in any kind of angry or combative way. Not trying to argue with you or anyone.

    I’m not of the same beliefs that .ml or the developers are. So I guess you can say you and I agree that yea their messed up I get it.

    But that’s the issue with the whole fediverse thing. Even though I do agree with you about .ml

    People are allowed to do whatever they want and believe whatever they want. That’s not up to you. Don’t Take that as an attack, I’m not meaning it as one.

    Think of it this way:

    It’s like .ml making this post but about your personal beliefs (they probably already do)

    OR

    let’s pretend lemmy was heavily conservative instead of liberal making this exact post. You’d think wtf ?

    You get what I’m saying ?

    But that’s not up to them to get what I’m trying to say ? Yea it’s fucked up but ppl are allowed to believe whatever they want. Even if what they believe is shitty. The thing is, one person doesn’t and shouldn’t get to make that call for everyone else.

    No one person knows what’s best for everyone

    • @Eheran
      link
      87 months ago

      I could agree with you if they would not specifically suppress anyone not agreeing with them. That is the big issue, meaning that anyone there only sees that one side of everyone agreeing with their nonsense, with no chance to get out.

      And we absolutely know that making shit up is not good for people and where that can lead to. It does not need to be "best’, just not the absolute worst.

      • Alice
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -57 months ago

        Unfortunately though… that is lemmy though dude. That’s what I’m trying to say.

        It’s by design. That’s how and why the fediverse is the way it is. It’s stupid yes I don’t agree with it either. But that is the truth.

        Echo chambers. That’s how they want it.

    • DefederateLemmyMl
      link
      fedilink
      47 months ago

      let’s pretend lemmy was heavily conservative instead of liberal making this exact post.

      I think you misunderstand the issue, so as you mentioned conservative, let’s illustrate it with an analogy.

      The situation with lemmy.ml right now, and apologies for the reddit analogy, is the equivalent if on reddit the batshit crazy mods of formerly /r/the_donald or /r/conservative could ban you from /r/linux because you said something bad about Trump on /r/memes. At that point it’s not about dissenting opinions, it’s about them wielding power they shouldn’t have over those dissenting people.

      An instance that operates like that shouldn’t be part of mainstream lemmy and host general purpose communities. The only way to take that power from them is to shun them, i.e. defederate.

      • @AchtungDrempels
        link
        17 months ago

        I wonder what your “call out” looked like that then actually got you temp banned from all those communities, have you laid that open anywhere too?

        • DefederateLemmyMl
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I told them something like: “The modlog of this community is ridiculous” and posted the same screenshot of the modlog that I posted on my thread on [email protected]. Forgive me if I’m paraphrasing, because my exact comment is gone.

    • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
      link
      37 months ago

      No one person knows what’s best for everyone

      But we do know what isn’t best for everyone, and that’s lies and disinformation.

      • Alice
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -57 months ago

        Thank God you’re not in charge of anything important in real life lol

        • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
          link
          47 months ago

          so… you think lies and disinformation is good? what the hell is wrong with you?

          • Alice
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -57 months ago

            So…you think youre in charge of what everyone gets to believe 🤔

            Get the fuck outta here 🤣

              • Alice
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -4
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Someone who believes they should control what others believe and think by managing social media typically exhibits *authoritarian or controlling tendencies, and have developmental issues such as a lack of empathy, an overdeveloped sense of superiority, authoritarian personality traits, insecurity and control issues, poor socialization, low emotional intelligence, cognitive rigidity, and moral absolutism

                That ends up leading to a problematic worldview where they feel justified in imposing their beliefs on others undermining individual autonomy and stifling diversity of thought.

                That type of developmental background results in poor interpersonal relationships and ultimately harming societal harmony and personal freedoms.

                Might wanna seek mental assistance