So I took the plunge and installed Fedora Silverblue because of all that immutable buzz. And it’s the most frustrating change I have made in almost 20 years of my distrohopping.

After installing Silverblue I configured it as usual. I installed necessary flatpaks, played with toolbox and distrobox, installed codecs, configured my bluetooth keyboard and other stuff in /etc and /var. Applied some useful tweaks I found on the web and… well… everything works. Nothing to do anymore. No issues. Nothing breaks, no dependency hell, everything runs smooth. I have nothing to tweak, tinker or configure anymore. So frustrating.

Every update is just… meh. Smooth, new, fresh system not affected by my stupid tweaking and breaking. Booooring.

I don’t have to distrohop anymore. If I want other distros I can just install them in distrobox. Other versions of apps? Something from AUR perhaps…? No problem. What’s the point of distrohopping now? Other DEs? I just rebase my system to other images with almost any DE or WM I want without losing data or messing everything up (damn you, UBlue!).

I don’t even have to reinstall the damn thing cause every time I update the system or rebase it to another image it’s like reinstalling it.

Silverblue killed distrohopping for me. Really frustrating.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    87 days ago

    After beginning to wrap my head around atomic immutable OSes, I can’t believe they’re not the standard for most servers. i can’t believe Debian doesn’t have an official atomic and immutable version yet, seems exactly like the kind of stability they aim for

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17 days ago

    lmao same, btw install nix using the nix-installer by deterministic system, now i can instalk any cli application without needing to enter distrobox

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    939 days ago

    You got me so good. Been using fedora for a few years now and I’ve been hesitant to hop to silverblue but now, after reading your issues with it I might just have to stay away. I can’t imagine a world of painless updates and rebasing smoothly. If I don’t have things to troubleshoot what else am I gonna do on my PC!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    749 days ago

    Oh man. I’m so sorry for your loss. May your system break at some vague point in the future in a way that is nigh impossible to diagnose and that no one else seems to have experienced. Godspeed, you unwillingly content penguin!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27 days ago

      that the thing, if it breaks, the roolback is there or simply rebase without merging /etc, so basically a factory reset

  • Lung
    link
    519 days ago

    I’m honestly so trolled, I hate change & hate the idea that something might be better than my existing Arch install. I hate that security, reliability, and flexibility are improved. I cope by reminding myself that I’m very low on disk space right now, for the needed extra partitions

    • @barsquid
      link
      89 days ago

      If you have a spare homelab machine Fedora does an immutable build called IoT (they branded it wrong it’s just a barebones install appropriate for servers also).

  • @kronarbob
    link
    318 days ago

    What an horror ! What are you gonna do ? Use your working system ? That’s sad…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    259 days ago

    I’m a bit behind on these immutable distros and have a small question. People keep saying you can just switch to another image if you want to switch desktop environments. But how does this solve the problem of the config files of the various DEs (GTK rc files or other theme stuff) messing with each other in the home directory? Because this was always a pain in the ass in normal distros

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27 days ago

      yeah, home directory is mutable, but you can simply create another user, the /etc is also mutable(the system do a diff of it every update) but you can see every file that changed there(compared with the remote image) using ostree, or create another deploy where you discart your /etc, so, if you discart your /etc, and create another user, you have fresh install, without needing to reinstall using a pendrive etc

    • @Pfifel
      link
      189 days ago

      Switching DEs is not recommended by devs so I assume the configs are still conflicting. Home dir doesn’t get affected by an image rebase most likely.

      • @hessnake
        link
        78 days ago

        I’ve switched between Plasma, Cosmic, Sway, and Hyprland without any conflicts. For the Plasma 5->6 transition it did change my config in a way that broke Plasma 5 when I rolled back, so problems are possible.

        Basically your mileage may vary.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      118 days ago

      But how does this solve the problem of the config files of the various DEs (GTK rc files or other theme stuff) messing with each other in the home directory?

      It does not. Your dotfiles will be a bit wrecked when you rebase. See: https://universal-blue.discourse.group/t/why-is-rebasing-between-desktop-environments-bad/690/4 It’ll also cause random issues like: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/flatpak-apps-crashing-after-rebasing-from-silverblue-to-kinoite/83623/2

      It’s mostly plasma fighting gnome, though. I haven’t seen any conflicts with say, sway.

    • @barsquid
      link
      79 days ago

      Your files are a mutable part, they stick around for rebase and rollback. (I believe /etc also.) If it’s only files in a home directory you could try a different DE by making a new user. But yeah I don’t think it has a built-in solution for something like that.

    • @iopq
      link
      28 days ago

      I guess you just have to use home manager on NixOS

  • macniel
    link
    fedilink
    239 days ago

    Is this a First Linux-World Problem? :D

    To me, I like how clean and coherent GNOME looks like, but what I don’t like about it, is how hostile it is in regarding of themeing/coloring.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 days ago

          It is my understanding that a lot of thought and care is put into the design language and appearance of applications and frameworks. However the same level of consideration is not usually afforded to skins and themes, which are often released an never updated again. This can cause usability issues and sometimes even breakages. Of course, people are free to do as they please with their computers.

        • just another dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          58 days ago

          Yeah. My guess is that for every meticulously hand crafted ui, there’s 10 that just go with the default. If a user wants an icon pack where🤘means home, they’ll be perfectly fine with navigating your application.

          Developers can always include an option to disable styling if that would severely break the ui. But personally, I’d rather use a application that looks roughly like every other one in the system, than one that’s so specifically designed that it doesn’t.

      • macniel
        link
        fedilink
        89 days ago

        Yeah I get the rational, and that DEs shouldn’t theme them apps but I want to have some sort of customization (not just an accent color).

      • Einar
        link
        fedilink
        39 days ago

        Thank you. I feel like I’ve found a new way to respect developers that I hadn’t considered before.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I don’t support that some want to push their own theme. Just use the provided theme. You may create your own custom theme but that should be able to be used everywhere. App icons can be part of a theme.

      • macniel
        link
        fedilink
        17 days ago

        Yeah I tried it, but sadly it didn’t really worked well in for example Geary.

    • @laughterlaughter
      link
      28 days ago

      What does rebasing mean in this context? I try to google it, but all I get is git rebase.

      Any articles about it that are worth reading? Or if you can explain, that would be neat. Thanks!

      • @olafurp
        link
        58 days ago

        It’s a command provided by the OS to distrotop between ublue distros. You can basically hop between silverblue, Kionite and Bazzite with a single command.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            47 days ago

            ostree based distros*, the default fedora don’t use ostree so you can’t rebase, bazzite is not fedora but they also use ostree, so you rebase there

            • @laughterlaughter
              link
              2
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              I have so much to learn. Last time I was tracking distros and having fun with distro hopping was with Slackware 7, I think.

              What is ostree? What is bazzite? Time to google stuff.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        38 days ago

        Its the same :D

        Rebasing refers to an OSTree remote which is like a git repo, but with binaries and producing bootable systems. There are some differences there.

        The idea is: there is a remote that has the exact wanted configuration, your system mirrors it. All the package manager does is similar to git pull.

        If you rebase, you switch the upstream remote, and your system gets the diffs, downloads them.

        The cool thing is, that these updates are atomic, so you stay on the current system and the rebased one is only set as the system you boot in after a reboot. You can still sudo ostree admin pin 0 before rebasing, and your current system will be saved forever to switch back to.

        Note that /etc is writable so you might still accumulate duplicate or redundant configs.

        gitlab.com/fedora/ostree/sig/-/issues