The company is trying to win back trust after last week’s backlash.

  • BrikoXOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Edit: Updated image to the latest version.

    • NaibofTabr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 months ago

      Very nice list, thanks for sharing. I hadn’t heard of a lot of these.

    • @Landless2029
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Holy shit. Thank you (and the author) so much for avoiding yellow/red/green icons. This is colorblind friendly!!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    105 months ago

    Was that the concern, though? I thought the controversy was that they intended to moderate people’s projects. Or did they walk that back too once they renounced the reason for that policy (I.e., training AI)?

    • Veraxus
      link
      English
      45 months ago

      That they would/could access my work for any reason whatsoever… that they even have that ability, that’s not just a line in the sand for me, it’s the Grand Canyon. I expect any kind of cloud storage to be private and protected (e.g. encrypted at rest)… no back doors, no exceptions.

      This is beyond the pale, and AI was never part of the concern.

  • @555
    link
    English
    5
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    … anymore*

  • NaibofTabr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    45 months ago

    "We have never trained generative AI on our customer’s content, we have never taken ownership of a customer’s work, and we have never allowed access to customer content beyond what’s legally required,” Wadhwani said to The Verge.

    " yet…"

    • BrikoXOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      It’s not even completely true. They did train their AI on Adobe Stock, which is royalty free, but is by definition customer content.