• @ChapulinColorado
    link
    English
    924 months ago

    This seems similar to the EUs requirements. It really speaks about the US laws when even archaic Japanese legislators (see Japanese copyright laws) are ahead of that market in customer rights/options.

    • @sensiblepuffin
      link
      English
      264 months ago

      Has the US ever been ahead of any of its peers when it comes to consumer rights?

      • Pennomi
        link
        English
        314 months ago

        No, but it also stands to profit from those violations of consumer rights, where other countries do not.

      • @woelkchen
        link
        English
        84 months ago

        Has the US ever been ahead of any of its peers when it comes to consumer rights?

        Fair Use is cool.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          94 months ago

          In principle it is cool, but large corporations can still bully you into submission even when it should fall under Fair Use.

          • @rdrunner
            link
            English
            84 months ago

            Ahhh America. “Yeah we’re wrong, but we can afford lawyers for centuries, lol good luck” land of the free

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 months ago

              It’s ridiculous. I think the law should be written with the expectation that the common citizen cannot afford legal counsel for an unlimited period of time.

              I am not a lawyer.

        • @sensiblepuffin
          link
          English
          24 months ago

          We’re trending in the right direction but we’re not at all in a position to be saying we’re better than anyone on that front, given how much industry pushback there’s been.

    • NekuSoul
      link
      fedilink
      English
      144 months ago

      At the very least it’s seems heavily inspired by the Digital Markets Act, which is why I’d hope that their wording will be specific enough to close those “loopholes” Apple is currently attempting in the EU.

  • AwesomeLowlander
    link
    fedilink
    English
    30
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Ooh, ooh, do the nintendo switch next!

    There’s a lot of irony here considering how so many Japanese companies have a track record of pulling this kind of shit themselves.

    • @NorthWestWind
      link
      English
      0
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The switch is already open source at this point thanks to all the awesome homebrew people

  • AItoothbrush
    link
    fedilink
    English
    154 months ago

    This will forbid “Prevent application developers from using features controlled by the OS with the same level of performance as the one used by Designated Providers.”

    Which is a huge win if it is enforced.

    • NekuSoul
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 months ago

      It sounds vague and will either end up being a very powerful tool or almost useless. If it’s the former, it would be gigantic win indeed.