• @njm1314
    link
    English
    1274 months ago

    Ah yes, review bombed the new catchphrase from game journalist used to dismiss justified consumer complaints.

    • BombOmOm
      link
      English
      454 months ago

      At this point to me, review bombed just means many people are unhappy with a product, likely for notable reasons. Any other connotation added would require me to trust the integrity of the journalist using the phrase, which is a bar they have almost universally decided doesn’t matter, particularly when it comes to media journalism of any sort.

    • DarkThoughts
      link
      fedilink
      244 months ago

      I feel it should only be used for when there’s some agenda pushing going on (like the whole woke crying whenever the incels are triggered by something), not for legit reviews due to malpractice from the devs or publishers or whatever.

        • DarkThoughts
          link
          fedilink
          43 months ago

          Nah. I’ve seen plenty of examples where people rather cried about people of color, females, gay people, etc.

    • MolochAlter
      link
      English
      84 months ago

      The words change, the business stays the same. Been that way since mass effect 3 and dragon age 2, at least.

    • @PoopMonster
      link
      English
      -44 months ago

      Review bombed basically means we’ll continue to play the game and give you money, but we are very upset about it.

      • @[email protected]OPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        You can review and refund a game and the review will stay up. Reviews definitely impact sales.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    354 months ago

    Wasn’t that the loveless corporate game that had all the cities literally just copied and rotated by a teeny bit?

    • body_by_make
      link
      fedilink
      English
      224 months ago

      I think of the it as the game that handed out vac bans to people because of inactivity, effectively fucking over a lot of people for the simple crime of no longer playing. (Vac bans only matter for the game that supplied them, but there’s a lot of games and servers of games that check your vac ban status and won’t let you play if you have one, no matter the source)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      164 months ago

      Yes. And there were only like 6 “mob” models and the entire game was just recolors of them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      84 months ago

      To be fair, they reworked a fair bit of that and some more.

      Which is actually the issue now - they keep reworking and improving stuff, but there is little new content. I feel like the game is just leaving it’s imaginary Early Access now. The new version coming probably should’ve been the launch version.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    194 months ago

    What’s bad about the re-release? I read the article and it honestly sounds like it’s trying to improve the game. I must be missing something.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      This has been a universal problem with any MMO game that tries to have some kind of a resource grind/time sink. Even if you can manage to stop players from botting it, you can’t stop players from third world countries selling their time to players in first world countries. The game economy quickly becomes a reflection of real world capitalism that most of its players were trying to escape.