Regardless of their innocence or guilt, the trial is widely regarded as farcical and unjust, even at the time.

  • Blackout
    link
    fedilink
    278 months ago

    Very interesting story. Even though the ballistics test proved their guilt decades later the trial was a sham and they should have been acquitted. Amazing how a fascist even came to their defense.

    • @Zombiepirate
      link
      English
      11
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      So much of forensics is cargo-cult “science” that starts with a conclusion and works backwards to prove it. Furthermore, the analysis is frequently subjective and without a control.

      Here is an article on ballistics testing in particular that highlights some criticisms.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      It’s hard to get worked up about an unjust conviction of someone who actually was the killer.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        178 months ago

        But these were two guys fighting against the robber barons and the rise of capitalism as we know it today. Yeah, a couple other working class people died as a result, but it’s hard to see it as cut and dry as all that. How many people have died of capitalism. The body counts are way, way out of balance.

      • Blackout
        link
        fedilink
        78 months ago

        He got what he deserved but the court case was a fiasco. I’d rather it be an honest justice.

      • Pooptimist
        link
        English
        48 months ago

        Still doesn’t justify a death penalty

        • @laserm
          link
          English
          18 months ago

          deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      This is probably the only Hollywood version with actors less attractive than the actual subjects were.

  • SourDrink
    link
    English
    38 months ago

    Nic Cage should do a biopic for Bartolomeo