alt text:

We’re right under the flight path for the scheduled orbital launch, but don’t worry–it’s too cold out for the rockets to operate safely, so I’m sure they’ll postpone.

    • @mrsemi
      link
      English
      235 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • SpookyAlex03
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        D’oh! I always get those two mixed up… Too many "Space Shuttle C_____ Disaster"s…

  • @AceBonobo
    link
    English
    17
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Surprisingly, if you google “hydrogen airship revival”, you will find that there are many companies trying to build airships.

    Since the non-flammable helium has less lifting capacity and is non-renewable and expensive, they are trying to use hydrogen safely. Good luck…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      185 months ago

      Armchair pseudo-scientific thinking like this was why Mythbusters became so popular. They even devoted at least one episode to this very myth. Spoiler, hydrogen wasn’t what made that particular lead ballon unsafe.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        I didn’t particularly like that episode because they didn’t do another control test and just called it a day

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The problem wasn’t hydrogen, it was the thermite the hull was made out of. Helium blimps blew up the same way soon after

    • @YarHarSuperstar
      link
      English
      85 months ago

      I think you accidentally put helium twice in your second paragraph. Just wanted to let you know in case you want to fix it for readability.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -35 months ago

      I don’t think airship travel is viable due to inability to properly steer them outside of very specific conditions, regardless of the filling. I would love to be proven wrong if it were somehow economic for shipping, but I have no high expectations.

  • Optional
    link
    English
    -75 months ago

    Unpopular Counter-point: a large number of engineers are also morons.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 months ago

      it’s normally upper managers sand baging. Everytime we have a new product they don’t involve anyone later stages in pipeline and keep the engineering team in a sealed space lab IN Mars. Then release the product half baked because the eng team quit or got dissolved to work on other more important projects. Then demand the sustainability team to develop it. So now it’s in limbo for 2 years but noo we must go to market now. Now it’s all trash but marketing cleans it’s image. Never fails to happen. Worst is new management come and say new product v2 but we are doing it all from scratch and ignore previous team mistakes. Like why?