• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I payed about $350 for my 20TB drives, which at the rate offered here would pay of in less then 3 months. Add some overhead in for a NAS and some extra drives for a raid and it still easily pays of in half a year.

    Shitty deal.

    • @peregus
      link
      English
      53 months ago

      And the very first sentence says:

      Unless you self-host at home on your own NAS

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      True, but S3 offers you extremely high availability and security for a quite fair price, and not everyone wants to immediately self host on their own hardware.

      • @brlemworld
        link
        English
        103 months ago

        Cheaper to use Backblaze b2

        • @nezbyte
          link
          English
          93 months ago

          Indeed, the article was written with Backblaze B2 as the S3-compatible storage used.

      • @errer
        link
        English
        33 months ago

        I stick data I will almost certainly never access again on glacier deep archive. Dirt cheap. Good place to escrow data.

        • @peregus
          link
          English
          23 months ago

          Wasabi have similar pricing to glacier, but without the limitation

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -13 months ago

      What do you do if your hardware is housed at home with crappy residential upload speeds?

      It’s a genuine question because I’ve settled for hosting on Storj, but because my friends and family can’t be bothered to connect via its client I’m running a WebDAV rclone proxy on a VPS over Tailscale. So not only am I paying for the storage itself, I’m also paying for transferring the data and on top of all that, it defeats the point of Storj being P2P from and end-user perspective.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      I think rclone has somewhat bad latency, at least from prior experience (albeit with Google Drive). JuiceFS seems to cache locally and can run my Immich instance, etc. With pretty good performance

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    In Canada, external hard drives of 8-20TB capacity show up every now and then for a rate of C$20/TB (US$14.50) so it won’t take more than 3 months to offset that cost. As a backup, online s3 storage might be reasonable.

    E - Speak of the devil: https://lemmy.ca/post/23948873

    • @peregus
      link
      English
      23 months ago

      Guys, read the article first! At least try, at the beginning it says:

      Unless you self-host at home on your own NAS

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 months ago

    Is that your article ?

    I am in a bit of a funny position, I am volunteering in an underdeveloped country, and have my immich instance running at my in-laws. But I don’t have access to my NAS. Backblaze would be ideal!

    What have you done to run it there? Is it as easy as mounting juicefs, and pointing immich dirs there?

    I have about 700gb that would have to be migrated, any ideas on that? Or would it be relatively transparent to immich just copy and pasting?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      Yes :)

      In theory it should be as easy as copy and pasting, but I don’t know if that wouldn’t fail because of a timeout. Though, I have managed to wget a Google photos backup directly into JuiceFS and extract + process it there, just took like a day of time.

      Mounting your Immich dirs there is all it should take. I would be careful with database directories/sqlite, they seem to bug out when mounted in JuiceFS

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        Yeah. I would keep the db local, and probably the thumbs and intermediary photos too. But the full resolution would probably be in S3.

        dB’s are not good on object store, and not good running over the internet. I wish they had native S3 storage, as that would allow for high speed access, where as this will download to the server, then upload to the client which will add latency.

        Cheers