• Flying Squid
    link
    331 month ago

    What a stupid waste of money. What do they think it achieved?

    • @fpslemOP
      link
      461 month ago

      Anger and outrage. Extremism lives on outrage, it wilts if it doesn’t have pissed off people to constantly feed it.

    • Avid Amoeba
      link
      fedilink
      35
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      A whole lotta companies to scale down or drop LGBTQ campaigns as they’ve now perceived the backlash as stronger than it actually is.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        -121 month ago

        So they’re no longer pandering to queer people? Because that doesn’t actually sound like the worst thing if you think about it. Or did you stay up this year until midnight on June 1st to watch all the corporate logos turn rainbow colors.

        Seriously though, Bud Light did a tiny campaign with one trans person. If that’s their idea of outreach, fuck them. Imagine if every single ad they did had white people except one time that was on a platform most people weren’t paying attention to anyway they featured a black woman. That’s just tokenism.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 month ago

          The thing is that most people think that bud light was printing a trans person on every can

        • @Zron
          link
          41 month ago

          So you don’t want any attempt at inclusion?

          Sounds just as bad as all the bigots getting mad about the one trans ad they did try to do.

          Inclusion is important, and it has to start somewhere. If you want big inclusive ads year round, then I suggest you start your own marketing company.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            61 month ago

            No, I want real inclusion, not this “we’re going to use an influencer and then not tell anyone about the tiny campaign.” If conservatives hadn’t thrown a fit, no one would have even known about this.

            I want to see trans people- all queer people- normalized. That means putting them front and center in major advertising campaigns as normal people drinking with their friends or whatever. It shouldn’t be a headline when a queer person is in an ad because queer people should just be in normal ads as normal people. And not just in June either.

            AB InBev did this so they could say, “we tried and it wasn’t worth it” when they really didn’t try. Same with Target. Tiny little rainbow area one month of the year and people bitched, so they said, “well, we tried” and then just gave up.

        • Optional
          link
          31 month ago

          What Bud Light “did” is absolutely irrelevant.

          Facts do not matter.

          MAGA!

    • Optional
      link
      131 month ago

      It’s cemented the MAGAt talking point that supporting trans people is bad for business.

      It’s pure propaganda, 100% - falls apart at the slightest scrutiny, which it will never suffer.

    • Optional
      link
      61 month ago

      No, this guy actually does the things he’s accused of