• @CMDR_Horn
    link
    English
    192 months ago

    No surprise. theyd benefit quite a bit from net neutrality

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      is that right? i think i misunderstood net neurtrality .

      I thought the idea was that net neutrality blocks creation of premium services for high bandwidth / high fideity services? surely netflix’d want that.

      Unless it’s a market power thing, and Disney or other large media corps would monopolize and price them out of the premium market segment.

      • experbia
        link
        English
        52 months ago

        described as plainly as possible, net neutrality is the requirement that an ISP (like Comcast, CenturyLink, Starlink, etc) treat all traffic equally as it flows through its network on behalf of its customers. Without net neutrality, companies can do some nasty things, like if a big media company existed that was also an ISP (like Comcast…) they could do things like intentionally delay or otherwise mishandle traffic for competing streaming services while prioritizing their own.

        net neutrality is good for Netflix because they have lots of bandwidth intensive content but they are not an ISP.

  • @Psychodelic
    link
    English
    52 months ago

    This is based on employees, right? Not the actual corporations

      • @Psychodelic
        link
        English
        22 months ago

        That’s what I’ve seen in the past. Like I’ve seen data showing that people working at a certain company donated to Bernie while there’s no way their company ever donated to him

        Do you actually know or are you just assuming as well? lol

        • @trolololol
          link
          English
          42 months ago

          I assumed that some Internet data had any sense in it instead of being sensationalized. I think I’m still too naive for Internet🥺