• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    422 months ago

    Hmm I’m not convinced it was the fruit. They should eat more and really find out if it was true

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      272 months ago

      🍉🤭 🌻

      🍉🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭

      ⌛️🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻

  • MushuChupacabra
    link
    302 months ago

    🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻

  • Rakenclaw
    link
    fedilink
    172 months ago

    Aww, they are upset their looting and pillaging has consequences. Boo hoo!

    • @Blum0108
      link
      372 months ago

      It’s not a war crime of the people poisoning the fruit are not combatants. They could probably be tried for manslaughter, and I doubt Russia would be very lenient.

      • @ninja
        link
        English
        -222 months ago

        People don’t get a ‘get out of war crimes’ card by not being officially in the military. If they purposefully took hostile action in the conflict they’re combatants, uniformed or not. The use of poison is a war crime.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          222 months ago

          When the Russians use rape as a weapon, I cheer on the locals in occupied areas serving poisoned fruit

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yes they do. This act falls under the purview of civilian enforcement. It is up to the controlling government to prosecute these civilian crimes in civilian criminal court.

          EDIT: Okay, so this particular argument irked me so I investigated. Unfortunately, Ninja is technically correct. According to the ICRC civilians receive an instantaneous removal of their status as non-combatant for the duration of the hostile act, and the ICC’s Rome Statutes clearly list using poison as a warcrime so it is probable the perpetrators could be prosecuted. More likely, however, is that their being subject to civilians laws means they can ALSO be prosecuted in the civilian manner. Double the risk for the reward.

          That said. Russia wants to FAFO that’s their problem.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            It’s not a frequent event when a person on the internet recognizes their mistakes. I’m glad I saw it today.

        • @Wilzax
          link
          32 months ago

          Not all war crimes are actually bad when committed against worse war criminals in self-defense.

    • @woelkchen
      link
      62 months ago

      Wait, this is allowed?

      Not by Russian laws but who cares about those.

  • THCDenton
    link
    52 months ago

    The do a little bit of trolling