For me, I really want to get into niri, but the lack of XWayland support scares me (I know there’s solutions, but I don’t understand them yet).

Also, I stopped using Emacs (even though I love its design and philosophy with my whole heart) because it’s very slow, even as a daemon.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      84 months ago

      I just started yesterday in a VM. It’s no stress and you can easily put your configuration on metal after. Pretty fun stuff.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        84 months ago

        The most satisfying part of the NixOS process is deploying to bare metal and watching it work exactly as you intend it to

      • RandomLegend [He/Him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 months ago

        I have my garuda installation just where and how i want it to be. NixOS just always seemed very interesting, but i don’t want to run it on my daily machine.

        • @tux7350
          link
          14 months ago

          Don’t, you can still install nix into Garuda. Works great as a separate package manager that won’t get in the way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      Agreed, but I found getting NixOS the way I want it, to be super overwhelming, and documentation simply sucks. I’ve been thinking of forking ZaneyOS (Link: https://gitlab.com/Zaney/zaneyos) and basing my NixOS config on it. Otherwise, it’s just too much.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      My drive to nix was so I could simply manage what packages I had installed with a text file. If I removed something from the file, I expect it to be uninstalled. I never found a tool/wrapper for apt to do this.

      If you want to start with nixos, I would take whatever distro you are on and install nix and then home manager. Then, you can slowly migrate your user configuration over without starting from scratch. That worked really well for me going from ubuntu to nixos.

    • @Nibodhika
      link
      14 months ago

      I tried it a while back, thought it would be good for my servers, but at the end of the day I found that it was a lot of learning for a very small benefit that could be achieved differently. Instead I focused on learning Ansible which also allowed me to write configs to deploy lots of services to my servers. I still want to learn Nix at some point, but I feel it’s a lot less important if you have an Ansible playbook that does the same thing and even more for any distro you might care to install.

      • @tux7350
        link
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I think the problem is that most people dive right in and go to NixOS which has its quirks as a linux OS (see FHS). The Nix language is great at building and moving source code between computers, really any big collection of binaries. If you don’t do that, try just using the nix-shell command to instantly run a piece of software without installing it. You can write a shell.nix file to hop into and out of an environment with whatever software you need. Once you can write a couple .nix files then move onto NixOS; which after all is just a big collection of binaries.

  • @Magister
    link
    284 months ago

    docker I guess, I still don’t know how it works, create them, etc

    • whoareu
      link
      fedilink
      194 months ago

      You don’t have to know how it works in order to use it. I don’t know either but I could host services using docker. trust me it’s way easier than it seems.

      • @warmaster
        link
        54 months ago

        Same here. Even easier if you use an app to manage it for you like dockge, portainer, Cosmos, etc.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You don’t have to… if the project you want to use has a good setup process. Otherwise you’ll be scouring Docker docs, GitHub issues, and StackOverflow for years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      I’ve been using linux on and off for 20 years and docker reignited my interest for running linux. There’s plenty of good guides and free courses, if you need help finding one - let me know and I’ll send you a YT playlist.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        And then when to do learn it, it pisses you off when something doesn’t have a freely available image.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      How to docker-compose in thirty seconds.

      Simply make a file called

      compose.yaml

      Then paste in the text from your application’s docker-compose instructions.

      Often the timezone needs to be set, along with the volume

      Example:

      volume: /mnt/hdd/data:/data

      This means the application’s data directory will be mounted at /mnt/hdd/data

      Then

      docker compose up -d

      You’re done, that’s all there is.

      docker-compose is fantastic because in a single compose.yaml file you can list multiple services.

      For example, my compose.yaml file contains my sonarr/radarr/bazarr/lidarr/prowlarr/qbittorrent/deemix/jellyfish/jellyseerr

      And I can update them all by running a shell script made of three lines.

    • zeekaran
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      Docker compose is amazing. I don’t even know how many things I’m running right now. Hell I’m running things I didn’t even use! (I could easily disable or delete them; I’m just lazy)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    244 months ago

    Bcachefs, and bcachefs on root. Need something with filesystem level encryption instead of LUKS, and *ubuntu’s and derivatives have all abandoned ZFS on root installs now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      Bcachefs has filesystem encryption without LUKS? Did this have an audit? I use BTRFS and it is fine, but boot is unencrypted (using TPM would be cool)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bcachefs

        Bcachefs is a copy-on-write (COW) file system for Linux-based operating systems.[3] Features include caching,[4] full file-system encryption using the ChaCha20 and Poly1305 algorithms,[5] native compression[4] via LZ4, gzip[6] and Zstandard,[7] snapshots,[4] CRC-32C and 64-bit checksumming.[3] It can span block devices, including in RAID configurations.[5]

        I see it has an audit back in 2017, but I’ve yet to find anything newer. The finding was good, but suggested further audit be done.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          I dont see the difference to BTRFS apart from encryption and maybe caching? I was always confused why people hype it so much.

          Interesting, yes I wouldnt not use LUKS if the alternative is less known, not used by enterprise distros

          • Badabinski
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            The tiered storage stuff is pretty cool. You can say “I want this data on this disk, so if I get a cache miss from a faster disk/RAM it’ll come from this other disk first.”

            I believe it also has some interesting ways of handling redundancy like erasure coding, and I thiiiink it does some kind of byte-level deduplication? I don’t know if that’s implemented or is even still planned, but I remember being quite excited for it. It was supposed to be dedupe without all of the hideous drawbacks that things like ZFS dedupe have.

            EDIT: deduplication is absolutely not a thing yet. I don’t know if it’s still on the roadmap.

            EDIT: Erasure coding is deffo implemented, however.

          • UnfortunateShort
            link
            14 months ago

            It’s mainly supposed to be simpler and by extension faster than btrfs (which is kinda proven by the fact that fewer devs made this thing work in less time when compared to btrfs). It happens to enable some extra features that way too.

            However, while btrfs annecdotally had many issues, it’s used by big players like SUSE and even bigger ones like Facebook these days. bcachefs on the other hand is nowhere near as battle tested, so I’ll stay away from it for a little longer.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              24 months ago

              Does it have the self-healing capabilies of btrfs scrup and btrfs defragment? I guess btrfs balance is b-tree specific.

              I heard BTRFS is bettter than EXT4 because it can do these things, EXT4 cant

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      Bachefs is in the kernel now so trying it on a spare drive or partition is super trivial these days depending on distro. You only need a few minutes of time.

      Getting it on root is a bit harder as almost no installers support it yet. The only distro I can think of is CachyOS.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        It’s far more ready than Wayland, get it into these distro’s installers! Are you listening, distros?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    194 months ago

    Neovim. I tried to use it a year ago, but I felt like I was fighting it every time I just wanted to make progress on my project. VSCode doesn’t get in my way. I’m going to give it another shot in a few years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      54 months ago

      Haven’t used neovim, but I had to try vim way too many times. I can’t use anything else now.

    • @emergencybird
      link
      24 months ago

      If you aren’t already, you could get familiar with the vim motions within VSCode via a plugin. Moving over to a vim setup can be overwhelming, setting up your lsp,linters, other packages. Adding on the need to still learn key bindings makes it extra difficult. I started with VSCode using vim motions, went to doom emacs and used evil mode and then my mentor got me hooked on vim. Do it in steps and you’ll get to a config that lets you code without much fussing, good luck!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        Oh, yeah, vim motions are wonderful. I started using them when I installed Linux on my Chromebook due to the lack of a good keyboard setup (I still don’t know where the Delete key is on that thing).

    • @k4j8
      link
      24 months ago

      I just moved from Neovim to Helix. I think it’s worth considering, especially if you don’t know the keybindings yet. Plus, Helix is probably easier to learn.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      214 months ago

      I used neovim but recently switched to helix and highly recommend it. If you haven’t tried nvim yet, give helix a try before deciding. A good way to compare is do the tutorial of each and see which you like more nvim +Tutor and hx --tutor (orhelix --tutor).

      If you’re a current vim user the helix keybindings are only a small learning curve after the tutorial, and feel a lot smoother imo

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        94 months ago

        I love Helix. I like that it pretty much works out of the box and the only thing you have to do is install language servers and in some cases configure them, but that’s (mostly) well documented. No need to install plugins or use a preset “distribution” like with NeoVim. I also like the built-in keyboard shortcut hints, for example when you press g (goto) it shows you what key will do what.

        The way Helix does “select first, then act” is subjective, but I like it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          64 months ago

          This is the reason I liked kakoune right away after I started using it: select, then act, and every movement is also a selection.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Agree on all counts. I didn’t like finding and comparing plugins for neovim, and then wrestling with environment stuff to get them to work, and having to change a bunch of options to get nvim to work how I want. With helix, my config of things I’ve changed from default is very small, and there’s no wrestling with plugins.

          And yeah, “select then act” feels a lot smoother and more intuitive to me. If you like that and like plugins tho, check out kakuone

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        54 months ago

        I’ve used helix for a few months and liked a few default keybindings. Didn’t like the reversed sequences (movement then action) so switched back to neovim and configured helix like bindings for some actions.

      • Russ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        I tried out Helix, but I think the biggest issue that I have is that with (neo)vim, I can use the keybindings in most of the editors I use through a plugin (such as IdeaVim for the JetBrains suite) - but I do not think the concept of Helix keybinding plugins have really hit anywhere.

        Helix itself seemed really cool when I was playing around with the tutor mode though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          Yeah I only really use it for personal stuff for that reason. There’s a vscode plugin, but last time I tried it it was really slow

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      54 months ago

      That’s me as well, I’ve used vim for simple edits over the years but more and more just used nano for most of my terminal based edits. Finally ran vimtutor (mainly because I wasn’t aware of it) and wow, I should have done that years ago.

    • dinckel
      link
      34 months ago

      The learning curve is absolutely colossal, especially if you want to use it as a full IDE. Even with the legend panel it still doesn’t tell you have the story

  • konidia
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Common Lisp. It would take a long while before I’m comfortable working on a project using that language. There’s also Lem editor but setting it up is a pain on NixOS.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      That’s my first time hearing of Lem—it looks fantastic. What’s the issue with it on NixOS?

      • konidia
        link
        fedilink
        04 months ago
        • There is no lem package on NixOS.
        • Common lisp related packages tend to be outdated
        • NixOS violates FHS to allow each packages to build against specific versions of dependencies, so CL tools might not work as expected.
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    124 months ago

    I kind of want to try wayland just to be modern, but I’m pretty happy with xmonad and don’t want to learn another window manager.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      54 months ago

      You might want to look into River, a tiling Wayland compositor inspired by xmonad. Disclaimer, I’ve not actually used xmonad before so I’m not in a position to compare the two. But River is configured entirely through riverctl commands. Its “config” is an executable, by default at $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/river/init but you can point it to a different path, which can technically be any executable file that just executes when River starts. Ordinarily it’d be a shell script calling all the riverctl commands you want to get your River set up the way you like it, but it could be any executable you like really. You can also use other languages other than shell scripting.

      It’s still in pretty early development, but I daily drive it for my main general-purpose machine and it works completely fine. I use it for web browsing, coding, gaming, chatting, general productivity, etc, all works. I’ve noticed some minor hiccups but nothing breaking or unusable. Tbh I would say it’s more stable than Hyprland which I’ve also used and have noticed that Hyprland updates (especially from git) would frequently break it, whereas I was running River compiled from the latest commit of master branch for a while and never had an update break things.

  • Vinnyboiler
    link
    fedilink
    English
    124 months ago

    There are several things I was doing in X-Org that I really don’t have the capacity to figure out in Wayland. One of them was customizing touch pad shortcuts, I used to like having 3 figure swipe commands that worked like keyboard shortcuts. The other was my KVM programs like Barrier seems unable to work in Wayland.

    I hope for simple solutions to these problems in the future.

  • @GustavoM
    link
    English
    114 months ago

    Anything beyond setting up a network-wide dns blocker on docker, so… crowdsec, fail2ban, some proxy-related stuff, zero trust tunnelers and so on.

    Why? Because its overkill to my current setup and I don’t see myself using em for real other than for learning purposes, and thats it.

    And before someone asks “Do you protect your server at all?”. Other than making some “hacky” stuff with my internet so all ports appear as closed whilst they actually aren’t? Eh, not really. Still, my server is about to reach a year of running nonstop 24/7 and it has never been hacked a single time since then, so naaaw.

  • Eager Eagle
    link
    English
    104 months ago

    Zed - I’ve been kind of using it for one-off edits, but it’s just not mature yet for most languages.

  • Daniel Quinn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    104 months ago

    Btrfs. I’ve been using ext4 for so long, I’m afraid that switching up will just annoy me.

    Zsh: same reason.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 months ago

      Perhaps you are a more discerning filesystem user than I am, but I don’t think I’ve actually noticed any difference on btrfs except that I can use snapshots and deduplication.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        44 months ago

        Not OP , but regarding zsh, it has much better auto completion, and suggestion support. Additionally you can theme your prompt much more, see for example powerlevel10k

      • Daniel Quinn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        Honestly, the only btrfs feature that interests me is the snapshotting, as the current state of my backups is rather sub-par. There’s just a lot of inertia involved in adopting it when ext4 Just Works™. Maybe next time I install a new system I’ll give it a shot.

        As for zsh, I rather like the general “intelligence” I see on others’ machines: the way it autocorrects typos, draws a navigable menu for tab completions complete with colour highlighting… it looks lovely. I’ve been a Bash user for 25 years though, and muscle memory like smashing the tab key to get what I want is a hard habit to break.

      • Daniel Quinn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Actually, tutorials like that are a big reason that I don’t want to switch. The first steps are things like:

        • Install these fonts that only work in a GUI environment
        • Install these programs straight from GitHub without your package manager

        …and all I hear is: “this stuff isn’t ready yet” and “I’m going to be staring at Unicode glyphs the next time I have to tinker outside of my GUI”.

        If I can’t easily and securely install a shell on every environment I use as I don’t want to be constantly context switching, then I’m going to have to stick to Bash.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          64 months ago

          …and all I hear is: “this stuff isn’t ready yet” and “I’m going to be starring at Unicode glyphs the next time I have to tinker outside of my GUI”.

          This really isn’t a zsh problem, but a “people putting too much stuff in a ‘getting started’ config”.

          I used zsh for 15 years before looking at any plug-in manager, you can get a lot of the good stuff like the completion by just going through the first-run wizard included in zsh. A lot of stuff is included directly with zsh, including various prompt themes (which is what that tutorial wants extra fonts for, because they use a fancy prompt with custom glyphs; I don’t think any of the built-in ones need that)

          Things like fuzzy history search with fzf is usually included with fzf’s distro package and the additional zsh-completions package for less used or newer commands is also packaged by most distros. In my experience, a lot of the other plugins are stuff that could be a standalone script instead of a plug-in anyway.

          • Daniel Quinn
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            Well that’s much more encouraging. I may just give it a try if the first run wizard is simple enough. Thanks!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    94 months ago

    Niri looks really cool. I’ve used tiling WM before but scrolling is a unique take, perhaps more productive for some folks?

    Nushell is a good one. I do data science for a living and it’d be nice to have the shell handle some small data transformations instead of writing a script in python. But all the syntax and behavior is very different than bash, so I’ve been afraid to start because of the learning curve.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    94 months ago

    Lapce, an IDE written in Rust. It’s nice and light compared to most IDE’s, so I use it a bit on my aging laptop from 2015. However, it doesn’t have the extension ecosystem or polish of my favored IDE, VS Code.

    • @fluxx
      link
      14 months ago

      Have you tried zed? Written in rust, has many extensions. I gave it a try, I quite like it. It’s blazing fast. But I haven’t tried on an old machine.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      54 months ago

      I’ve always wanted to contribute to an open source project but by the time I get done with the grind of the work day I don’t have the mental energy to effectively work a second job competently.

      • @glitches_brew
        link
        34 months ago

        I feel that so hard. Open source/personal projects seem just a little out of reach with my current mental bandwidth.

    • Russ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      For what its worth, I know that while a lot of the hardcore Linux community seems to absolutely despise Ubuntu/Canonical because of snaps and whatnot, I don’t think there is anything actually wrong with using Ubuntu if that is what works for you. Use the best tool for the job!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        ive been feeling stability issues with it on the last cycles, pretty gnarly issue on gnome and they still havent pushed the point release that fixes it, been wanting a change but i need the machine for work, so i dont want to fuck around with it.

        • Russ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 months ago

          Ah, gotcha. May there be more stability in your future soon!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        Hey hold on, I also hate Ubuntu because of how awful gnome is. Can’t blame everything on snap!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            34 months ago

            Been rocking Manjaro with Gnome for a long time, but then Plasma 6 came out, I switched over and couldn’t be happier.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          Well, Ubuntu does not force you to use GNOME and GNOME is not exclusive to Ubuntu.

          So, what you are basically saying is that you use Ubuntu and hate GNOME.