• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    174 months ago

    No, because a lot of city people live in places where they can’t charge cars, and–at least in Canada where we kiss the boots of landlords–no one’s forcing charging infrastructure multi-unit dwellings.

    Electric cars aren’t for city dwellers, they’re for suburban homeowners.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      84 months ago

      Most, if not all, of the new apartment complexes in my area heavily advertise they have EV charging on site. Problem is they usually only install 1 or 2 chargers for a complex that has parking for 50-100 cars. That sort of ratio is fine anywhere else, but it’s not a reliable option if you and your neighbours (who were also sold by that promise) all need to get to work in the morning.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah, honestly the infrastructure is the most of the problem. Even in crazy cold, battery life drops but doesn’t disappear.

  • @Makeitstop
    link
    154 months ago

    How often do you have to refill your gas tank? If it’s damn near daily, then your ability to rely on an EV is going to be much more limited than if it’s closer to once or twice a week.

    If you have an outlet at home that can be used to charge an EV, and you don’t regularly drive hundreds of miles in a day, an EV is likely a viable replacement for an ICE car. If you do make long distance trips regularly enough for that to be a concern, you will probably be more dependent on the availability of charging infrastructure in your area.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24 months ago

      But on the flip side, if you’re rarely filling your tank because you drive so little, does an EV really make a lot of sense? The people who will see the biggest impact (financially and environmentally) are the ones who use most of their EV’s range every day.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    114 months ago

    Nha, city dwellers could use bicycles most of the times

    • @FireRetardant
      link
      3
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Or the electrified transit we should be building

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        Bus driver here. Our transit commission finally got it’s first EV bus to start the transition to the electric system! But we still need to build the charging stations for it and other EVs to use, not to mention the bureaucracy and other normalities that go in certifying any vehicle for the road, plus our one garage did kinda burn down, so that has set things back a wee bit…

        It’s coming, but do expect it to take a long-ass time.

        • @FireRetardant
          link
          24 months ago

          Trams dont need charging stations. We need more trams. We had them 100 years ago we could do so much better today

      • Phoenixz
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        Too, yes. Under 10kms all can and will be bike with good infrastructure. Anything beyond that can be public transportation, again, with good infrastructure

        • @FireRetardant
          link
          14 months ago

          I meant my statement to be inclusive with cycling.

          We also need localized transit because some people are unable to cycle. Some people may also refuse to cycle in some weather. Some people also work labour jobs and don’t really want the extra exercise on their commute.

          • Phoenixz
            link
            fedilink
            24 months ago

            I’m not proposing banning cars or other forms of transportation altogether either. I do propose that we severely restrict (in comparison to today) car traffic. Make it more expensive, make the roads to take longer than by bike, push it all where possible out of city centers.

          • Phoenixz
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            I’m not proposing banning cars or other forms of transportation altogether either. I do propose that we severely restrict (in comparison to today) car traffic. Make it more expensive, make the roads to take longer than by bike, push it all where possible out of city centers.

          • Phoenixz
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            I’m not proposing banning cars or other forms of transportation altogether either. I do propose that we severely restrict (in comparison to today) car traffic. Make it more expensive, make the roads to take longer than by bike, push it all where possible out of city centers.

            • @FireRetardant
              link
              14 months ago

              Cars aren’t accessible to everyone either. A blind person cannot drive a car and probably can’t commute on a bike, but they may be able to take transit.

              If we want car free city centers, we need transit.

              • Phoenixz
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                Oh absolutely! I sometimes forget to mention public transportation, but yeah… < 2kms is walkable, < 10 kms is easily doable by bike, beyond that public transport. And short range public transportation of course as well for those that can’t bike, or for when it rains

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Depends how “city” you’re talking. If you’re in a large core, sure, but Canadian cities are sprawling enough you really need something faster in many urban areas (like public transit).

      • Phoenixz
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        That’s why I said most of the times. Anything under 10km can easily be done by bike, especially once you get used to it.

        I ride my bike to work every day and I do the ~5km on bike faster than by car, every single time

      • @FireRetardant
        link
        24 months ago

        We should also address how wasteful and poorly planned our cities are

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          Yep. It’s tough, though, since building is slow, and now that the infrastructure stretching way out is there it doesn’t make much sense to abandon it. Some cities are getting rid of stupid zoning laws at least.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    54 months ago

    Maybe with today’s batteries, but that can/should change.

    There is also the whole North American train phobia.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If you can charge overnight, the convenience of EV is something you can never come back from.

    Imagine getting up every morning, driving as far as you need all day, coming home, and getting up again the next day to do it again—without EVER hitting a gas station.

    I work 50 km away. In my gas guzzler, I frequently push my luck on a low tank because I am running late—often because I rushed home without stopping the night before. Having to fill-up with gas gives me frequent range anxiety. It seems that I am always having to stop.

    My wife has an EV. When I drive it, the most striking difference is the complete lack of having to worry about fuel. Going 250 km in a day is normal for us but day-to-day life never stresses the 400+ km range that the EV starts each day with.

    The only time we have to think about charging is on trips longer than 500 km. Even then, it has never been a big deal. One time on Vancouver Island we almost had an issue and did have to stop for dinner longer than normal. The fact that this has only happened once in 3 years ( and only because we did not even bother to check if it would be a problem ) really dives home what a non-issue it is.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -24 months ago

    Not really as it is a more sustainable compromise between car infrastructure and cleaner transport.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      144 months ago

      How often do you “long haul”? I’d argue an EV (with all of the perks of never going to a gas station again) is a great primary car and an ICE might make a decent SECOND car if you need to drive longer distances and if the charging infrastructure in your area is lacking.

      • @Duamerthrax
        link
        34 months ago

        It’s also like these people have never heard of rentals.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          People are not generally inclined to plan on regularly needing a rental. I’m not saying that’s how it should be, but for car buyers the phrase of “I’ll rent every time I have a special task” isn’t a winner. It should be, if folks realistically assess how often those special tasks happen (probably rare), but that’s not how buyers work. They want to be able to say “my car meets all my needs”.

          Again, I’m agreeing that rentals are the perfect choice, because “special tasks” are actually pretty fucking rare. It’s just an uphill battle of purchasing comfortability

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yeah, people can and do roadtrip in EVs. If you’re on a 4 hour trip a 20 minute charge is a minor inconvenience at worst, and a needed break at best.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      … in north America.

      My experience in Europe where the EV infrastructure is more developed, long trip are not an issue. I don’t even plan my trip, I just go and charge when I need it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Edit, wording

        Still a 8h driving day will require more charging time than gas refill time, regardless of how many chargers there are.

        Acknowledged on your planning point, that’s a huge improvement.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          Still a 8h driving day will require more charging time than gas refill time,

          Sure. Nobody disputes that.

          But it’s a very small percentage of the population who drives like that.

          And for much of the rest of the people, an EV can be a viable option.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            Right but north Americans get closer, much more regularly.

            The point of my comment was to strip away any notion of region or everyday use, and only focus on energy… Density per hour driving, and the available habits of refueling via whatever source.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          In the uk the woodland trust are.putting chargers into car parks so you can atop on a long drive for.a walk in the woods, it’s great for those rare long journeies and can tie in with lunch perfectly.

          Supermarkets and similar are doing the same so you can shop and charge at the same time. Were going to see more of this as infrastructure improves and roll out continues, rather than adding time fueling electric cars for most people will remove the need to ever make a stop just to fill up.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            Totally, that’s great

            But I’m discussing the situation where you have 8h of pure movement to complete. Every stop is a burden. Currently fueling a gas car takes easily less than 10 minutes, and with 2 people both can use the restroom and prepare the car in 15, generously.

            I’m not saying thats an every day thing. I’m just discussing the differences between ev and ice cars right now, regarding the pace of a long journey.

            In my opinion, currently, the “perfect” garage would have an EV for local travel which is used regularly, and an ice car for long journeys.

            The “perfect” choices, if available, would be ev in the garage, rent an ice car for long trips.

            The “middle ground” I’m interested in personally is a hybrid, but I’m in no need of replacing my vehicles currently.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      What is long haul?

      We have done quite a few trips over 2000 km — often with young children. Stopping for 20 - 30 minutes every 3 - 4 hours to grab a bite and hit the bathroom does not seem much of a burden. We did one last summer that included three North American countries. We did not even think about it. We just pulled out of the driveway, drove, and stopped when it made sense. Great trip.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        you’re the exception, not the norm. When I have to take the worktruck to BC its 12hr days stopping once for 200L. 3-4 day drive depending on the weather and borders. Simply can’t do that in an electric and itll be a long time before the infrastructure is ready for it. Think thats an extreme circumstance? How about Ottawa from Toronto in 6hrs? thats a STRETCH with modern long range electrics. Quebec City, the Sue, Halifax? All one day drives with gas currently. Until that problem is solved; electric is a great city runner and not much more.

    • Noxy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      guess I hallucinated that trip from Seattle to Vegas and back, huh

      i was sure I saw myself in the battlebots audience last season, but I guess I hallucinated that too

      i must be going crazy (or you’re wrong)

    • Em Adespoton
      link
      fedilink
      94 months ago

      Funny… last I heard, farm equipment was going electric in a serious way.

      Not all rural vehicles need to be long-haul.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        And unless you need to go like 4 hours between possible stops EVs can long-hual. Even in the road-having parts of the North that’s not usually the situation, which is it sounds like the point of this article, which I will now read.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        Not really, there’s a few manufacturers but none of the big ones have made a serious push for it. Farmers are extremely conservative and wary of things they can’t repair themselves, there’s a reason why you still see them using 70s and 80s tractors on the daily and they’re still able to repair them.