• @alexc
    link
    151 month ago

    The original? An absolute classic to look at and horrible to drive. The new one? Looks like the original was stung by bees and forgot it’s EpiPen

    • @Schmuppes
      link
      91 month ago

      The new one (first generation)is essentially a Golf IV, so it’s at least a functional vehicle. Those are almost old enough to have a historic license plate in Germany.

      • @saltesc
        link
        4
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah, I wouldn’t say “new”. I remember as a kid, Mandy Moore had one in a music video and was too young to hold a license so the driving was all faked.

        She’s 40 now.

        Edit: Sorry for that, everyone.

        • @Schmuppes
          link
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Over here it’s indeed called the “New Beetle”, I wasn’t saying you were wrong. Merely pointing out that time flies by for those who are getting old.

      • @alexc
        link
        21 month ago

        Maybe it was the one I drove - I found myself pushing the steering wheel in a bid to get up a relatively modest incline. I was also quite alarmed by how quickly things were passing me.

        Then again, my daily at the time was an RX-8.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          thats quite a point of comparison

          beetles are fun but arent that powerful, and its an old car so you need to be on top of maintenance.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    91 month ago

    It’s an absolute classic.

    A few days ago on my way home from work, I saw someone driving a convertible 1961 Beetle, I thought it looked so cool.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 month ago

    I had a long wheel base super bug. Was incredible. I still miss that thing.

    My work collegue has a new beetle. It’s basically a monster truck in comparison. Nothing small about it.

  • @hOrni
    link
    21 month ago

    A classic, but uncool? It was always a classic, pretty car. But I remember seeing a lot of them when I was young, so they don’t seem “special” to me.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 month ago

    They’re impressive for what they are: a vehicle engineered at a time of minimum resources and manufacturing/maintenance ability, for a specific goal.

    I respect them for that. Otherwise don’t care for them at all. Awful to drive (they have the same suspension as a Corvair that dumbass Nader called Dangerous at Any Speed), only with that god-awful front suspension design that has major bump-steer issues. Gutless air-cooled engine, no AC and practically no heat.

    But I’m comparing it to anything built after it that didn’t have the serious constraints it’s designers had to contend with. I would’ve loved it in 1940 Europe.