As usual, the NYT will cover just about anything other than phase-out of fossil fuels, which I’d both what we need and would upset major advertisers

  • Track_Shovel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    65 months ago

    No, it can’t.

    While soil is a big pool of C, the effort needed to pull enough C into the soil to make a meaningful difference is astronomical.

    C increases in soil take much more time than we have to get our carbon balance under control. Instead of focusing on things that make actual differences (green energy, reductions) start ups like this have us chasing our own tails.

    Improving soil C is a great thing, just not the solution

    • @grue
      link
      English
      35 months ago

      Instead of focusing on things that make actual differences (green energy, reductions) start ups like this have us chasing our own tails.

      Correctly differentiating between “good enough idea to be worth pursuing” and “greenwashing scam” is a difficult skill too few people have. Doing it while also avoiding the pitfalls of seeking a single silver-bullet solution, falling for misinformation (e.g. “EVs are worse than gasoline cars” or anti-nuclear hysteria), or succumbing to cynical nihilism is even harder.

      • Track_Shovel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        I think the most relevant part of your comment is not falling for silver bullet thinking. It’s a highly complex problem; why would a simplistic answer work?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    25 months ago

    It’s something, but since most news orgs (all?) are owned by conservative billionaires, they are banking on a Trump win and want to stay ahead of the narrative so it doesn’t look like they’re the capitalist flibbertigibbets they are or run afoul of Trump’s ever-changing whims.

        • Track_Shovel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 months ago

          Apparently, or at least reading too fast, and missing the comment on the post, thus the disconnect. Without that, your comment is hilariously confusing on a topic about soils.

          The missed cue is mine for sure, but I hope you can see why I was wondering what was up

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            35 months ago

            For sure. I tend to ignore NYT, Newsweek, and other similarly right-wing-owned publications at this point, so I don’t usually bother reading their published stories past the headline.

            By comparison, random internet comments are often more interesting and illuminating!