• Armok_the_bunny
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Two ways I can think of to close that loophole: a) make tie the minimum wage to the executive’s total compensation, so the workers either get the proportionate amount of stocks as the CEO or money of equivalent market value (also include expected performance bonus as part of that) and/or b) keep a basic minimum wage around as well, so that CEOs can’t accept a pitifully low salary outright.

      • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not CEO, but the highest paid position in the company.

        Someone in power can easilly just give the CEO title to some dude and give himself the title of “Chief General Officer” or some bs like that

      • Throw_away_migrator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        My biggest fear with this proposal is that lower wage positions just get offloaded or somehow classified as “independent contractors” or consulting or some other bullshit. Or they create some shell company to all these positions. Or some other chicanery.

        Don’t get me wrong, I agree in principle. But God damn if actually enacting and enforcing wouldn’t be some legal whack a mole with these slippery bastards

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Stock grants are always quite vague in value - it’d be really hard to actually come up with a precise number for it… and in theory a bad actor (like Elon Musk) might be able to really fuck up that algorithm.

      • Crashumbc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        While a nice idea, in reality you’re dealing with sociopaths that will do anything to horde money. They would come up with work arounds in six months.

    • RangerJosie@sffa.community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s part of it. But it’s pointless without raising it to a living wage first.

      Pinning it without raising it just cements the slave wages in place. Which business would love I’m sure.

  • SonicDeathTaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the eastern Kansas city that I live in, a living wage for a single person with no kids is almost $20/hr. There is no way $18 is nearly enough in California.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Minimum wage should be adjusted to inflation, and get a COLA increase every year. It should also be retroactively adjusted, which would put it around $26+

    There’s no way an adult should be forced to work more than 40 hours a week for not enough to live on. When that is a norm it’s an illustration the economic model is failing.

    And frankly, even 40 hours is too much, keeping people too exhausted for civic engagement and parenting, which figures largely into our intergenerational mental illness epidemic.

  • crystalmerchant
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    TIE IT TO PRODUCTIVITY AND INFLATION, god damn it!! Picking a number is what got us here in the first place!

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    They should want $60 or $260 an hour. As long as people at the top are making billions a year off the backs of these workers, they should demand a lot more than they are getting.

  • kemsat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t care what the number is. Just want to be able to afford a 1 bedroom apartment, food/water, bills, and a bit of savings.