North Korea’s defence minister has warned the United States that the deployment of nuclear assets in South Korea could meet the conditions for its use of nuclear arms, according to state media.
Kang Sun Nam’s comments, reported on Thursday by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), came in response to the US sending a submarine with nuclear-armed ballistic missiles to South Korea this week for the first time in decades.
“The ever-increasing visibility of the deployment of the strategic nuclear submarine and other strategic assets may fall under the conditions of the use of nuclear weapons specified in the DPRK law,” Kang said in a statement, referring to his country by its official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
Tensions between the US and North Korea have been on the rise in recent weeks with Pyongyang increasing its ballistic missile testing in defiance of Washington and international sanctions.
Late last week, the US, South Korea and Japan released a joint statement condemning the launch of a North Korean intercontinental ballistic missile days earlier.
“The United States reiterated that its commitments to defend the ROK [Republic of Korea, or South Korea] and Japan are ironclad and backed by the full range of capabilities, including nuclear,” the statement said.
The three allies went on to hold a joint military drill on Sunday.
On Wednesday, South Korea and Japan reported that North Korea had launched two more ballistic missiles.
The US and South Korea also held their first so-called Nuclear Consultative Group meeting this week. The White House said it provided a chance for the US to reaffirm its commitment to provide “extended deterrence” to South Korea.
“Any nuclear attack by North Korea against the United States or its allies is unacceptable and will result in the end of that regime, and the US and ROK sides highlighted that any nuclear attack by the DPRK against the ROK will be met with a swift, overwhelming, and decisive response,” the White House said in a statement after the talks.
On Thursday, North Korea slammed the nuclear meeting. “The phase of a military clash on the Korean Peninsula has surfaced as a dangerous reality,” the KCNA report said.
You must log in or register to comment.
Do they need food aid again?
Do we need nukes in every country on earth?
No?
I’m not sure how this is a proper response to my comment.
North Korea is known for creating conflict to obtain food aid for their citizens (captives).
I was asking if this was the case again.
“The United States reiterated that its commitments to defend the ROK [Republic of Korea, or South Korea] and Japan are ironclad and backed by the full range of capabilities, including nuclear,” the statement said.
nukes launched that close to China would mean WW3
At least we could all collectively stop worrying about the climate stuff, right?
Nah, I’d rather keep on living for as long as I can
I bet there is at least a 4% chance you would be in the group that wishes they had died in the initial blasts.
When are we going stop fucking around with North Korea and just flat out stomp that dictatorship to dust?
Sick of the threats time to end the bullshit before they do just that and use a nuke.
The US tried that, it was called the Korean War. China got involved and it got messy. China still doesn’t want a US ally on their border, so they would likely get involved again if conflict did resume. Given they have nuclear capability well beyond Nork’s, see how that’s a problem?
Laughs in geopolitical alliances
When are we going stop fucking around with North Korea and just flat out stomp that dictatorship to dust?
Think this through. The population under the Kim regime is severely impoverished with few skills, little arable land, and nearly nonexistent health care for its population. It borders both China and Russia.
You’re proposing we take out the Kim regime. Okay, lets say that’s done. Now what? You broke the country with you deposing the leadership. Now you’re the leadership. Be prepared to take on 40-100 years of rebuilding an entire country where it doesn’t have the resources to do that all the while boarding the other countries in the world in the top 3 of “most number of nuclear weapons”.
Oh, don’t forget to bring you wallet. You’re going to be paying for ALL of it for 100 years in cash…or you can mostly ignore them and throw some bags of food at them to shut them up now and then. Which do you chose to do, World Leader?
I mean Germany did it. I think S Korea could handle it. Russia and china wouldn’t like US bases on their borders.
If we glass them Russia or China might pop off. That’s curtains for the human race. One man with a 308 is a better solution, but we don’t do that sort of thing, right?
