Reported as an “unreliable source” which does not appear to be the case.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-intercept/
"In general, The Intercept provides in-depth investigative stories that are sensational in nature. Most stories are critical of the right-left establishment and lean strongly progressive left in ideology.
Failed Fact Checks
A factual search reveals they have not failed a fact check; however, in 2016, they fired Juan Thompson for fabricating quotes and establishing email accounts to trick editors. The Intercept reported: “Thompson admitted to creating fake email accounts and fabricating messages but stood by his published work. He did not cooperate in the review,”"
It’s weird that you’re being upvoted for the same thing the fact check bot said… and I don’t see anyone in this post saying it’s an unreliable source, so I’m confused on where you’re getting that from?
Cited link, just a bit more detail than the bot.
If you want to be the party of “Not Fascist Freaks” then you can’t be fascist freaks.
Attacked with cardboard?
The Intercept - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Intercept:
MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
https://theintercept.com/2024/08/20/dnc-harris-gaza-uncommitted-protest/