• @db2
    link
    English
    262 months ago

    What a fitting last file.

  • @waigl
    link
    English
    152 months ago

    Is OpenBSD seriously still using CVS for development?

    • go $fsck yourself
      link
      English
      162 months ago

      Yeah, that’s weird. It’s pretty unorthodox to use a pharmacy chain for development.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        To be fair, they have a pufferfish as a mascot, so there’s bound to be some need for pharmaceuticals.

    • Fred
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      CVS is the authoritative repository of code, and they recommend to users to use that or reposync (built atop of CVS) to keep their system updated.

      There is also a GitHub mirror , and got is an OpenBSD project, and I suspect a number of devs use one of those for local work until it’s time to push the changes to the authoritative tree.

    • @Jagger2097
      link
      English
      52 months ago

      They can work on replacing that next

    • rhabarbaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      Yes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?

      • @chellomere
        link
        English
        42 months ago

        For example, maybe branching is something you’d like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?

        • rhabarbaOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 months ago

          OpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.

  • don
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 months ago

    Reminds me of the GNU/HU(I)RD.