Alexandrite is slick, gorgeous, and brings a lot to the Lemmy experience. I highly recommend giving it a try.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    521 year ago

    Looks pretty. I’m not entering my login credentials though. Lemmy needs an app token system or something.

    • @sheodox
      link
      English
      141 year ago

      (dev here) I totally understand that, I wish Lemmy had that or oauth, I don’t like handling passwords just as much as you don’t want me to!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Hi dev! Any plans on a light theme? For me, this is one of the few sort of websites I prefer a lighter theme as I’m coming from old.reddit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 year ago

    While looking good on desktop (based on screenshots), it is definitely not designed for mobile. See below

  • poVoq
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Is there a way to use this as a total replacement for the lemmy-ui as an instance admin?

    • @sheodox
      link
      English
      141 year ago

      (dev here) I hadn’t really considered it as a full replacement before, but hosting it alongside the instance like a desktop version of m.lemmy.world is something I think would be neat (at least one instance is doing that, with a custom Dockerfile because I haven’t made one yet). I’d need to add some mobile support (which I’m not against doing in the future) and some admin tools probably before it could be a full replacement, both would probably not be for a bit still because I’m still working on feature parity for normal users. Also still waiting on a Lemmy issue to be fixed before I can add image uploading which is the most basic feature the site lacks at the moment.

      • BlueÆther
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I’d like to be able to run it as an alt UI on my instance as well.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Wefwef/voyager works well as a mobile interface. It only has an iOS style interface now, but it’s really good, and they’re working on an Android skin if that’s a dealbreaker

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          A beta version of the Android theme is already in as of 0.24.0! It’s still a work in progress, but Wefwef dev seems to move along at an impressive pace.

          Settings > Appearance > Device Mode

        • @sheodox
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          True, I’ve been using Voyager on my phone and it’s a big improvement over lemmy-ui in my opinion.

    • Sean TilleyOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      This is something I’d really love to see, as well. While I’d say that the default UI on Lemmy is “functional”, in that it gets the job done…I would love if the backend could support alternative bundled frontends. This is something that Pleroma supports, and it’s a great feature. It’s something I wish more Fediverse software could officially support.

      • maegul (he/they)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s defeinitely possible with lemmy.

        Check out endlesstalk.org, they have three frontends!

        • m.endlesstalk for voyager,
        • old. for the old reddit web ui and
        • new. for alexandrite.

        Not to mention lemmy.world that also provide m.lemmy.world for voyager (formerly wefwef).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      If it’s also intended for use on iPhone, it’s not ready. Renders too wide on my device.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        it is clearly meant for use on desktop

        While there are quite a few mobile apps on Android and iOS now, one interesting area gets overlooked: alternative web frontends.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          As I said to the other person:

          I assume you didn’t read the comment I was replying to, which asks if it can be used as a default ui on a server, which affects everyone, but thank for questioning my comprehension ability.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            asks if it can be used as a default ui on a server

            that is irrelevant. the point is, that this is considered desktop solution. it is expected that everyone uses some kind of app on the phone, so the fact that it renders too wide on your iphone is irrelevant.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              “it is expected that everyone uses some kind of app on the phone”

              lol ok

              lemmy apps are still in development, don’t even reflect some server settings correctly, and the only version of lemmy that works totally as intended is the web portal, but we’re all expected to be using apps for everything?

              sure, buddy

              edit: also the point is that someone asked if it could be used as a lemmy instance default front end, which would only make sense if only desktop users ever logged in via a browser. How you cannot absorb this detail is beyond me really.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                it is clearly stated this is a desktop solution, so keep complaining it doesn’t work on your iphone. i am sure if you add little more sarcasm, it starts making sense.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  The comment I replied to clearly asked if they could use it as a default instance front end. I know you want to cast the question I was responding to as also irrelevant, but it just isn’t, when plenty of people log in via a mobile browser, whether you like it or not.

      • Ghostalmedia
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        I assume you didn’t read the welcome note

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I assume you didn’t read the comment I was replying to, which asks if it can be used as a default ui on a server, which affects everyone, but thank for questioning my comprehension ability.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Which, again, is why I was pointing this out in reply to someone asking if it could be used as the default ui on a lemmy instance.

          • maegul (he/they)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I get that. Thing is an instance can use multiple alternative front ends, so I don’t want to shut down the question, because it’d make sense to run one for desktop and mobile (voyager for example).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Or possibly just adjust aspects of the responsive design to correctly present for mobile viewports, but the point still stands that having it as a default for an instance is a premature notion right now due to anyone logging into that instance on a mobile browser.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I also backed up and now see what you meant about being able to have multiple front ends for an instance. I read that as being able to select a frontend, not as having an “instance.com” and a “m.instance.com” at the same time, but that would solve the concern I raised. Yeah, we’re good.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    I really need hoverZoom+ to work on Lemmy. I will use anything that allows that, and this may be great, but I’ll never know because no hoverZoom.

    • Sean TilleyOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      hoverZoom+

      This is really good feedback. I wonder what that would take? 🤔 Is this something where the app needs to be updated with some property, or does this need to be fixed on HoverZoom+'s side?

      • @sheodox
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        I use Imagus and it doesn’t work well with Alexandrite, I was trying to find some documentation on if I could support Imagus from the website side somehow, like attributes to provide non-thumbnail image URL hints but I hadn’t found documentation yet.

        I’ve been meaning to try building something similar into Alexandrite at some point otherwise.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I don’t know, I know it works in a lot of places automatically, but I’m not sure how it works. Maybe if the thumbnail has some sort of pointer to the real image?

  • Oliver Lowe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    You know what’s funny? I would never use something like this (my own Lemmy client is absolutely terrible in comparison!). But I’m so happy that Alexandrite exists: it’s proof that programming and web development can still be experimental and loads of fun. Congrats to the developers!

    • Sean TilleyOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Honestly, I think this is the real selling point of the fediverse, at least for developers. There’s no incentive to force people to use Official Mobile Clients™. You can literally spin up something (meaning a fediverse server) locally, if you want, and test against that until you have something that works. And as long as you stick to the API, you can build whatever you want.

      • Oliver Lowe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Yes - well, almost! I made a read-only filesystem interface to Lemmy then wrote a small program for one of the Plan 9 text editors/programming environments to access it.

        The real thing would be to serve that filesystem interface over the Plan 9 file protocol (9P). Not quite there yet!

  • 💡dim
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    Combination of constan tleft sided subscriptions list, and posts in overlay mode, really is a pleasure to use

  • Kronusdark
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    Yea, this is definitely going to be the way I use Lemmy in desktop going forward. I actually liked the Reddit redesign so this feels nice to me.

  • DJDarren
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Using this now, and yeah, it’s really lovely.

    As good as wefwef/Voyager is (particularly in helping to transition from using Apollo to access Reddit), it kinda falls apart on a desktop browser because it’s built around swipe gestures, and lives squarely in the middle of the screen. So Alexandrite for desktop, Voyager for mobile seems pretty sound.