We propose the symbol ⁂ to represent the fediverse.

  • Handles
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1483 months ago

    There already is a symbol for the fediverse:

    This has existed for years already, is used widely, and IMHO looks way better than this dull attempt. I see no good argument in the campaign website for using this new one instead.

    • _NoName_
      link
      fedilink
      33 months ago

      Gimme an ASCII character for it. We can replace the bitcoin character with it

    • Corgana
      link
      fedilink
      -53 months ago

      This logo is really unpopular hence why there is always so much talk of making something cleaner and more professional.

      • Handles
        link
        fedilink
        English
        83 months ago

        …and this latest proposal certainly isn’t either of those things.

        This logo is really unpopular

        Source? I’ve only ever seen a handful of strawman arguments that “I’m not offended by the vague resemblance to a pentagram/use of rainbow colours implying LGBTQ+ support, but somebody might be”, but its fairly wide adoption suggests that most people — myself included — actually like it.

        • Corgana
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          This is the first I’m hearing of any issue with it resembling a pentagram, the criticisms I’ve heard involve the design in general not looking professional, not scaling well, and lacking a unique palette.

  • @Tenthrow
    link
    583 months ago

    3 cat buttholes. I love it.

  • Machefi
    link
    fedilink
    383 months ago

    About the current “pentagram” symbol:

    However, its design is a little too complex to be used at small sizes, as you would in text or in a button. It’s also only available in image form, not as a typographical character.

    We’ve used it as a tiny icon below posts from other instances and I’ve never found it problematic. I think it’s already too well established to replace just because we can’t type it. Besides, the three stars feel to me not distinct enough. Pushing Unicode Consortium to add it to the standard when the time comes is a batter way.

    I do think however that it would be worth coming up with a proper name for the current symbol.

    • SanguinePar
      link
      303 months ago

      I do think however that it would be worth coming up with a proper name for the current symbol.

      The Fedigram maybe?

    • @Kuinox
      link
      103 months ago

      Instead of changing the symbol, we can ask the unicode committee to put the current fediverse symbol in the unicode.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Note that if supported by the font you use, the three symbols will usually be drawn the same way as an asterisk (*) in that font. This means a lot of variation.

    Your browser’s rendering: */⁂

    Several typefaces’ rendering of Unicode U+2042 ASTERISM:

    I think the diversity is alright! It’s like the Fediverse: instances follow a standard to work with each other but can be heavily customized without breaking integration.

    • no banana
      link
      23 months ago

      Asterisms used as dinkuses in the James Joyce novel Ulysses, the “Wandering Rocks” chapter, from the 1922 edition.

      Wikipedia is wild

  • maegul (he/they)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    213 months ago

    I appreciate the argument, but I feel like there’s too much of a chance that we can do better with something in unicode. Or, that this isn’t really good enough. Three asterisks is just too meh, IMO, to catch on.

    ⁂ … to me right now just looks like a splodge on the screen.

    Somewhat unfortunately, the pentagram in the older icon probably can’t really be used without some cartoon-ification, because reasons.

    • @halcyoncmdr
      link
      English
      -13 months ago

      we can do better with something in unicode.

      Uh… It is Unicode.

      U+2042 ⁂ ASTERISM

      • maegul (he/they)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        103 months ago

        I know, but Unicode is big. I’m saying that there may very well be something better.

  • Zier
    link
    fedilink
    163 months ago

    So 3 footnotes? A bunch of snowflakes (which we are not)? Just, NO! Find something unique and original, that’s how branding works.