I tried SD once and it was pretty good. It was a bit difficult, of course. Now I want to try image generation again. Do you still think I should use SD or a different tool?

  • @hoshikarakitaridia
    link
    1019 days ago

    For people who want something older that’s well documented: SDXL

    For people who want the new fancy thing: Flux (vram hungry with 16fp dev, but you can go 8p or you can use the schnell variant, which just means “fast”)

    For people who want the faster image generation: SDXL lightning.

    For tools, people are split on using either python/huggingface, the automatic1111 webui or comfy UI, which is my personal favourite.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    The hottest model now is flux, and the community is gravitating toward it after the failure of stable diffusion 3.

    Tooling around it is still nascent and it is very demanding (12GB+ VRAM GPU highly recommended) so you could also start with Stable Diffusion XL, fairly mature at this point.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    219 days ago

    If it was a bit time ago, a new version of stable diffusion has come out. It always gets better. Of course it depends what kind of images you want to generate.

      • shootwhatsmyname
        link
        fedilink
        English
        217 days ago

        If you’re using Mac, DiffusionBee is super easy to install and use, also supports FLUX

      • @Dagamant
        link
        119 days ago

        It’s a front end for stable diffusion. It works well, so does automatic1111