• @YoBuckStopsHere
    link
    491 year ago

    If there are no consequences here…that means states can just keep enforcing gun bans SCOTUS deemed unconstitutional and that all rulings from the Supreme Court have no merit.

    • Raging LibTargOP
      link
      161 year ago

      As there are no real consequences for the corruption in the supreme court, there will be none for those who ignore their decisions.

      “Now let them enforce it” -Some racist dickhead president the Orange One idolizes-

  • @WilliamTheWicked
    link
    461 year ago

    And yet, they’re 10th in line holding their hands out for federal funding. Seems like it’s time to shut off the tap and see how strong their disgusting ass convictions are.

    • girlfreddy
      link
      51 year ago

      And new instance is created … Alabama’s Disgusting Ass Convictions.

      jk lol

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -511 year ago

    Funny how the people who claim to oppose racism are up in arms that race isn’t the driving factor in districting. Almost like they’re not opposed to racism at all, they just want to use it for their own ends.

    • @uberkalden
      link
      231 year ago

      Opposing districting that is explicitly designed to lessen the voting power of black people isn’t opposing racism?

    • @halferect
      link
      201 year ago

      They fully recognize race is a factor. They are only recognizing two distant areas with a high population of black people shouldn’t be one district. If you look at the map it’s grouping two random areas together that’s are not even close and it just happens to be areas with more black people. Democrats recognize race and that it plays a factor in this country, republicans deny race exists and that it plays a factor while designing a system that systematically targets people of color.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Racism already is a driving factor in how Republicans draw district maps. There is no other plausible explanation for why there has never been more than one Black representative in a state in which over a quarter of voters are Black.

      It’s not racist to be capable of identifying the effects of racism. It’s not racist to try to eliminate the effects of racism.

  • @tallwookie
    link
    -731 year ago

    why do the Democrats want to redistrict? is it because they’re losing? some other reason?

    • Bluskale
      link
      fedilink
      371 year ago

      1/7 districts (14%) were majority black, but the population is 27% black. The argument was that the black voters were unfairly concentrated into one district and diluted into the other 6 so as to limit their effective representation in the government.

      • @tallwookie
        link
        -641 year ago

        who forced them to live in that district? couldnt they just move? presumably they’d move somewhere else, not stay in Alabama

        • @halferect
          link
          28
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why should they move?it’s their homes, their lives. Should we just make a state for black people? Or instead represent the people fairly. If you look at the maps it’s pretty obvious they cut the districts to give black people less representation

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          261 year ago

          If you suddenly got notified that the place you live has been redistricted to put you in a district which reduces your voting power, would you be ok with your “solution” of uprooting your entire life, changing jobs, finding a new place to stay, and re-registering to vote? Or would you maybe pursue a less completely-insane solution to the problem?

        • girlfreddy
          link
          51 year ago

          Couldn’t you just move to Florida and live with DuhSantis?

          • @Countess425
            link
            41 year ago

            They can learn all about how great slavery was for black people, I bet they don’t even know.

        • @Countess425
          link
          11 year ago

          Because the point of having elections is to represent the people who live in a place, not changing the demographics of a place to reflect the government a political party wants.

    • @uberkalden
      link
      181 year ago

      Why wouldn’t you want to redistrict when it’s been gamed for minority rule?

    • @Duder167
      link
      01 year ago

      If you block this user your browsing experience will improve