Orange man bad, Genocide woman good!
Obnoxiously parroting trumpesque nicknames is probably what got you banned…
How can you not see that you’re diminishing your point by acting that way? Nobody on the left is going to change their mind because of childish insults - that’s kind of a conservative voter thing.
Was it worth losing the election to support genocide?
Edit: I’ll assume the downvote means “no”. Hopefully you’ll learn from this and start organizing.
Strange because calling Trump names doesn’t get anyone banned.
Seems like only Trump is allowed to be called out for supporting Genocide.
You’re a repeat offender. This isn’t your first time with the nicknames and I imagine the mods are sick of your commenting style.
I’ve said it before…you and I have a lot of similar opinions but the way you go about expressing them is just so bad. You’re turning people away from your cause.
Repeat offender of calling of “calling out a person complicit in Genocide for spreading debunked propaganda”. The horror!
I’m sure nobody calls Trump nicknames either.
And everyone who says Jill Stein is a Russian agent gets a permaban too.
Because surely the Lemmy.World mods aren’t pushing an agenda right?
You were told, repeatedly, by multiple mods, in multiple communities, that you’re free to direct your ire to Bibi, Israel, and the IDF where it belongs, but neither Biden nor Harris are the ones out there targeting individuals or pulling triggers.
Your constant flow of misinformation, ignoring temporary bans and warnings, is what got you booted out of the communities in question.
You still haven’t learned.
but neither Biden nor Harris are the ones out there targeting individuals or pulling triggers.
Isn’t this pres admin breaking US law to send even more weapons for the genocide?
You use “oh it is just iron dome stuff” rhetoric but that’s not true, and even if it was, a defensive system lets them take violent actions with less worry of retaliation
That accusation was moot after Congress approved the aid.
Did you read the article because your response article doesn’t really address it, or the moral culpability of it either
Like, is the argument you’re making that congress also approves of giving weapons to allow genocide, so it is fine actually?
The argument was that Biden was illegally supplying weapons, which was true when he side-stepped Congress to do it.
Once Congress approved of it, the support became 100% legal.
Legality has nothing to do with morality.
No, the argument was that he was so enthusiastic about genocide that he was willing to break the law to be a vital part of it.
Man I wish you were around when Regan was doing this secretly, maybe if more people had their panties in a twist back then, this wouldn’t be business as usual today.
Biden is not “enthusiastic about genocide”, he believes, rightly, that Israel has the right to defend itself from attacks, which they do. That’s the source of Biden’s support for Israel.
Israel has the right to defend itself from attacks
Is killing hundreds of thousands of civilians with something like 70 percent women/children casualties defending itself? If genocide is required to defend itself, it should be destroyed.
Also, Palestinians have a right to armed resistance against an occupying force in accordance with international law. Do you support the United Front’s right to defend itself against Israel?
JordanLund is the powertripping Lemmy.World mod of /Politics and /WorldNews who permabans anyone that says Joe Biden is complicit in Genocide by the way.
And a Zionist who supports sending weapons to israel.
I kind of expecting something like this to happen with the new debate.
How is [email protected] doing?
Same, though I expected them to come up with a better cover than covering for debunked Genocide propahanda. JonsJava pretended I was never banned for that before
I post on globalnews occasionally along with .ml their mods do a far better job at banning the Zionist trolls
And with that, a million cries of ‘genocide’ were silenced.
On 9/11. What a coincidence.
