• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        Fairly certain the suspension would not be needed when you liquify a human being under the tracks

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      NICE. I would like to see the Cybertruck and BYD vehicles added, among others, but I will definitely take a broader chart over a cherry-picked up-to-date one!

  • Obinice
    link
    English
    312 months ago

    Those huge American style lorries are mental at the front. They look cool, but what a wild blind spot.

    Check out European lorries (like those in Euro Truck Sim for example), the cab ends at the window. Still a powerful beast but compact, and with fewer blind spots. So much easier to drive.

    Still some blind spots though, be careful round em :-D

  • @remer
    link
    English
    272 months ago

    American trucks need American units 🇺🇸 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🚀💥💦

      • @Bytemeister
        link
        English
        72 months ago

        Terrible.

        1/63rd Furlongs to see a 1000 caliber 36 month old from the drinking seat of a light duty American truck.

        Source: an actual American.

  • @DarkSurferZA
    link
    English
    262 months ago

    Lol, it took me a second to figure out this chart.

    I was wondering where the hell am I reasonably expecting to encounter a 2.5 meter tall 5 year old…

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    English
    242 months ago

    I’d go for the Abrams if it didn’t have such bad fuel economy. Then again, I guess it’s good to get out of a traffic jam.

      • @hakunawazo
        link
        English
        82 months ago

        Make sure you try that before in front of a mirror like in Taxi Driver for convincing results.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        I’m pretty sure that’s exactly what Eddie Hall(former world strongest man) did. At least he drove over someone else’s car before.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      Hmm, could you electrify an Abrams? I wonder if there would be a way to make it street legal, given that’s it’s not so much different from a large SUV at this point.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yes! And you can dump any removable armour, because road rage incidents rarely involve calibers larger than 55.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      I can tell you’re not American because we consider fuel economy to work like golf, the lower the number the better.

  • @hakunawazo
    link
    English
    172 months ago

    I wasn’t aware with my European mind that you can call an Abrams uber there. Wow.
    Seems like the perfect solution for a lot of urban problems.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      Make sure you specify what kind of firearm you want with the uber order, otherwise you could get something stupid.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 months ago

    What about the lower-profile Warsaw Pact tanks? Are they safer to drive around small children?

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 months ago

      “They are made for small children, that’s why they have an ammo carousel!”

      *slaps turret and gets blown up by random bolted-on Kontakt ERA

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 months ago

      They’re actually really good for this, none of the crew had any jolt or bounce injuries after either Budapest or Tienanmen.

      You’d have to file a 285 if you tried to pull that in a sherman.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 months ago

    My take from this is rear engine vehicles are the safest to drive around small children.

    Lambo it is.

  • @carl_dungeon
    link
    English
    112 months ago

    Now what about if you’ve lifted the front about 2 feet and lower the back? That’s big these days.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 months ago

      TBF, the type of vehicle doesn’t really matter. If you want to murder someone, do it with a car and just claim you didn’t see the person, that you are shocked, and it’s just an “accident”. Nobody will question this.

      • @IsThisAnAI
        link
        English
        12 months ago

        Do that, I dare you, see how it actually works out for you 🤣

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I don’t have a license nor a car so it might be more suspicious in the first place. I also don’t want to murder anybody. But seeing how our society considers deaths cause by cars as normal and unavoidable “accidents”, I’ll probably still have more chances of getting away with it.

          Like, sorry, I didn’t see them, I’m just learning, it was an accident. The person just jumped in front of the car, in dark clothing, with no reflective gear.

          https://www.vice.com/en/article/you-can-kill-anyone-you-want-with-your-car-as-long-as-you-dont-really-mean-it/

          https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328812169_If_You_Want_to_Get_Away_with_Murder_Use_Your_Car_A_Discursive_Content_Analysis_of_Pedestrian_Traffic_Fatalities_in_News_Headlines

          Deaths caused by cars are horribly normalized.

          • @IsThisAnAI
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Go ahead try it. You’ve linked an opinion piece and a paper on news headlines. You didn’t just Google those and then linked then before fully understanding in order to try and win an Internet agreement did you? You also ignore that the overall clearance rate for murder starts under 50% and convictions below 30 right, but you expect that to be a higher clearance for bikes?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              No, I linked those because I have had this argument for years now and it’s tiresome. People driving cars can clearly get away with much more than if they were not in a car.

              The last incident I just read about was a cyclist that was killed by someone in a car. He was in a group of 10 and the driver claims she didn’t see him. No charges, it was “obviously” an accident. Someone is dead, killed by someone driving a car, and it’s no biggie. It’s just an “accident”.

              So, whatever the clearance, either it’s a huge pickup or a sedan, it doesn’t really matter if the driver can see people in front of them or not, they can just say they didn’t see them, it’s an “accident”.

              There are indeed statistics on how clearance and the height of a vehicle can be more deadly, but again, it doesn’t really matter because nobody cares about deaths caused by cars.

  • Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 months ago

    Wait, does the driver in an Abrams really only have the periscope and the hatch, with no higher-mounted cameras?