• RidderSport@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fairly certain the suspension would not be needed when you liquify a human being under the tracks

    • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      NICE. I would like to see the Cybertruck and BYD vehicles added, among others, but I will definitely take a broader chart over a cherry-picked up-to-date one!

  • Obinice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Those huge American style lorries are mental at the front. They look cool, but what a wild blind spot.

    Check out European lorries (like those in Euro Truck Sim for example), the cab ends at the window. Still a powerful beast but compact, and with fewer blind spots. So much easier to drive.

    Still some blind spots though, be careful round em :-D

  • remerBannedBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    American trucks need American units 🇺🇸 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🚀💥💦

  • DarkSurferZA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol, it took me a second to figure out this chart.

    I was wondering where the hell am I reasonably expecting to encounter a 2.5 meter tall 5 year old…

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d go for the Abrams if it didn’t have such bad fuel economy. Then again, I guess it’s good to get out of a traffic jam.

      • hakunawazo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Make sure you try that before in front of a mirror like in Taxi Driver for convincing results.

      • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m pretty sure that’s exactly what Eddie Hall(former world strongest man) did. At least he drove over someone else’s car before.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hmm, could you electrify an Abrams? I wonder if there would be a way to make it street legal, given that’s it’s not so much different from a large SUV at this point.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes! And you can dump any removable armour, because road rage incidents rarely involve calibers larger than 55.

  • hakunawazo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wasn’t aware with my European mind that you can call an Abrams uber there. Wow.
    Seems like the perfect solution for a lot of urban problems.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      “They are made for small children, that’s why they have an ammo carousel!”

      *slaps turret and gets blown up by random bolted-on Kontakt ERA

    • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re actually really good for this, none of the crew had any jolt or bounce injuries after either Budapest or Tienanmen.

      You’d have to file a 285 if you tried to pull that in a sherman.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    My take from this is rear engine vehicles are the safest to drive around small children.

    Lambo it is.

  • carl_dungeon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now what about if you’ve lifted the front about 2 feet and lower the back? That’s big these days.

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      TBF, the type of vehicle doesn’t really matter. If you want to murder someone, do it with a car and just claim you didn’t see the person, that you are shocked, and it’s just an “accident”. Nobody will question this.

      • IsThisAnAI
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do that, I dare you, see how it actually works out for you 🤣

        • pedz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t have a license nor a car so it might be more suspicious in the first place. I also don’t want to murder anybody. But seeing how our society considers deaths cause by cars as normal and unavoidable “accidents”, I’ll probably still have more chances of getting away with it.

          Like, sorry, I didn’t see them, I’m just learning, it was an accident. The person just jumped in front of the car, in dark clothing, with no reflective gear.

          https://www.vice.com/en/article/you-can-kill-anyone-you-want-with-your-car-as-long-as-you-dont-really-mean-it/

          https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328812169_If_You_Want_to_Get_Away_with_Murder_Use_Your_Car_A_Discursive_Content_Analysis_of_Pedestrian_Traffic_Fatalities_in_News_Headlines

          Deaths caused by cars are horribly normalized.

          • IsThisAnAI
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Go ahead try it. You’ve linked an opinion piece and a paper on news headlines. You didn’t just Google those and then linked then before fully understanding in order to try and win an Internet agreement did you? You also ignore that the overall clearance rate for murder starts under 50% and convictions below 30 right, but you expect that to be a higher clearance for bikes?

            • pedz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No, I linked those because I have had this argument for years now and it’s tiresome. People driving cars can clearly get away with much more than if they were not in a car.

              The last incident I just read about was a cyclist that was killed by someone in a car. He was in a group of 10 and the driver claims she didn’t see him. No charges, it was “obviously” an accident. Someone is dead, killed by someone driving a car, and it’s no biggie. It’s just an “accident”.

              So, whatever the clearance, either it’s a huge pickup or a sedan, it doesn’t really matter if the driver can see people in front of them or not, they can just say they didn’t see them, it’s an “accident”.

              There are indeed statistics on how clearance and the height of a vehicle can be more deadly, but again, it doesn’t really matter because nobody cares about deaths caused by cars.