• Owl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    153 months ago

    Reptile ? You mean dino

    • NegativeNullOP
      link
      English
      113 months ago

      If birds are dinos, then dinos are reptiles, and therefore birds are reptiles

      • Owl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        133 months ago

        If birds are dinos, then dinos are reptiles

        ?

        • NegativeNullOP
          link
          English
          7
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Birds are a clade of dinosaurs ( a child group). In exactly the same way, dinosaurs are a clade of reptiles. So by extension, birds are a clade of reptiles.

          You and I are also walking fish.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            93 months ago

            I think they were pointing out the structural issue with your statement. They info you are attempting to convey is correct. Your ability to do so is questionable.

            • NegativeNullOP
              link
              English
              03 months ago

              If birds are dinos, then dinos are reptiles

              I’m not sure what is structurally wrong with that statement. Birds are dinosaurs (most people know this by now). Using the exact same logic, dinosaurs are reptiles as well.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                9
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                a= “birds are dinos”

                b= “dinos are reptiles”

                c= “birds are reptiles”

                Structure: If a then b, therefore c

                a does not imply b without an additional statement (which we can assume from the rest would be “because birds are reptiles”)

                You’ve basically just said birds are reptiles because birds are reptiles

                • NegativeNullOP
                  link
                  English
                  33 months ago

                  I see. Thank you you for that explanation. I was letting inference do some heavy lifting. (and yes, I’m not a great communicator)

          • @AEsheron
            link
            English
            43 months ago

            But fish don’t exist.

  • @finitebanjo
    link
    English
    63 months ago

    And here I thought the evolutionary split between feathers and armor plates was what separated modern birds and reptiles.

    • NegativeNullOP
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Saddam was in its belly. I’ve highlighted here: