The consequences of this election could extend for millennia.

        • @Wilzax
          link
          7
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          It’s easy, simply be a US citizen over 18 years of age in a state or territory that has representation in the election of the president, duh!

          If you already are that, check https://www.usa.gov/register-to-vote for further instructions and limitations

          You may be eligible to vote by mail if access to a polling place is a concern for you.

            • @HowManyNimons
              link
              35 days ago

              Thank you! It seems unfair that only Americans get to vote on whether or not the climate gets destroyed.

              Not that Harris has ever presented a particularly strong position on climate change.

          • metaStatic
            link
            fedilink
            45 days ago

            #woooooooosh

            of those affected very few can vote and of those that can very few do.

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    75 days ago

    If Trump wins there won’t be another millennia, shit there might not be one anyway with the way the corpos are running the world into the ground with no signs of stopping.

  • @Cosmonauticus
    link
    55 days ago

    I dunno. Europe, the US, and Canada wreaked havoc across the globe for 400+ years and ppl continue the gloss over it. I’m voting for anyone not Trump but to pretend a facist sociopath from a white majority country never left a trail of destruction in their wake sounds like revisionist history.

    None of them ever fixed what happened and now we have Trump. Only difference between then and now is its going to actually affect white ppl.

    • @Fades
      link
      1
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Ah yes a lot of bad history happened so more bad history is simply meh and not a threat. You’re truly saying that a narcissistic dementia patient who dreams of being Putin with an out of control biased Supreme Court and full immunity is not a notable threat?

      pretend a facist sociopath from a white majority country never left a trail of destruction in their wake sounds like revisionist history.

      This has never happened in US history and that is notable given what the US can accomplish these days (and consider it won’t just be the US when Trump teams up with his dictator lovers). You think it was bad before? Does it make you feel good to paint this threat as just more of the same?

      What a take, especially since this article is simply talking about how the ramifications will spread to generations, nobody is saying how this is THE greatest threat ever and anything else wasn’t shit.

      Who are you even responding to

    • flicker
      link
      44 days ago

      to pretend a fascist sociopath from a white majority country never left a trail of destruction in their wake sounds like revisionist history.

      Who is doing this?

        • flicker
          link
          33 days ago

          Oh.

          How is that pertinent to this post or discussion? Or do you just want to talk about Putin being a dick? Because I’m all on board with that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -55 days ago

    Naah, the rest of us will just do what we did last time he was in the WH. Ignore for the most part whatever nonsense he spouts, host him occasionally because after all he is the US President and we need to keep good relations with the US, and otherwise just get on with life while America inspects its own arsehole for four years, then breathe a sigh of relief when he leaves.

    Ukraine might be fucked though. Depends if Europe can step up to fill in for what no longer comes from across the pond.

    • Aa!
      link
      25 days ago

      The article is mostly about his impact on climate change efforts. You can certainly ignore it if you want, because there’s a lot of anxiety to be had over it.

      He most definitely would screw up the little things we are trying to do, but I’m not convinced what we’re doing is nearly enough, so I suspect it won’t have the impact this article claims.

  • @Maalus
    link
    -215 days ago

    “millenia” lol in 30 years nobody will know who Trump even was.

    • @Wilzax
      link
      195 days ago

      The president 30 years ago was Bill Clinton and we all remember him, and he was far less controversial than Trump has been

      • @HeyJoe
        link
        25 days ago

        Yeah, I just took a look at a list, and I am not someone to know much about history, but even i knew the basics of most of them up until Lyndon B. Johnson. I only know the name but can’t really say I know much else outside what took place during that decade like NASA. And then after that it’s JFK, so I agree 30 years is to soon to forget. It’s more like 50 or more. For reference, I am in my 40’s so that probably helps.

      • @Maalus
        link
        -35 days ago

        Who’s “we all”? 95% of this world doesn’t give a duck about US presidents.

        • @Wilzax
          link
          25 days ago

          95% of the world is directly impacted by the leader of the largest economic and military power in the world, so whether or not you give a fuck is your own prerogative. But the fact remains that it is important to the context of your own politics, just as how the politics of Britain, the EU, China and India are all very important to the context of ours.

    • Rhaedas
      link
      fedilink
      85 days ago

      We still remember many Presidents who were bad, but nowhere near his level. But remembering Trump wasn’t the point of “millennia”.