I recently was scrolling through my All feed and noticed some NSFW content on lemmynsfw.com. It was blurred but I wasn’t expecting it. What do you all think of this? Should we continue to federate with some NSFW instances? I’m personally OK with it as long as the content is blurred unless I click on it but wanted to get your opinions on it.

Edit: Completely forgot about the NSFW settings that everyone has. We’ll continue federating with NSFW instances going forward.

  • Brian Lawson
    link
    fedilink
    English
    381 year ago

    I agree with most of the sentiment in these comments. Allow users to adjust filters & setting individually. Block individual users if they’re reported. Save defederating for hate speech, brigading, trolling, etc.

  • Rygel the Dom
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 year ago

    You can filter out NSFW content in your own account settings, so I see no reason to defederate from them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not from your instance, so take my opinion with a grain of salt, but I specifically looked for an instance that could access all the communities I want to take part in. You probably have users like that on your instance too, who would be sad or would even move to another instance if this were done after they joined.

    In your settings, you can choose not to see any NSFW content. Similarly, when you’re not logged in on an instance, any NSFW content is hidden by default. While registering, it asks whether you want to see that, so I think you must’ve picked yes.

    The main reason to defederate from instances with NSFW communities, as far as I’m aware, is that your instance will cache anything one of its users views from another instance. If that thing includes stuff that’s illegal in the instance’s jurisdiction, that’s a problem… Lemmy doesn’t even cache images, just the text, but that would contain a link to whatever content’s in the original post.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      This is one reason why I chose midwest.social, that it federated with NSFW content. I vote let users control NSFW at their client level, and moderate NSFW content that isn’t correctly tagged.

    • seahorse [Ohio]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      I completely forgot about that NSFW setting. I thought it was just to automatically blur the image or not.

      • R. J. Gumby
        link
        fedilink
        English
        221 year ago

        I just did a little test. With “show nsfw content” checked, images are blurred. With it unchecked, the post is not visible at all.

  • ArgentCorvid [Iowa]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    I think it’s OK as long as it’s tagged. Don’t really see the need to host it though, if there’s a difference on your end.

  • @tallwookie
    link
    English
    151 year ago

    if it’s blurred, you cant actually see it unless you click on it. I guess I dont see the problem

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    I’m here to replace reddit, so yeah I think I personally would like the option, even though I don’t usually look at NSFW.

    in Bob Belcher voice “its the principle of it!”

  • MrFrobozz [Iowa]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    I personally have no issue with it. So long as it’s properly marked (is marking as NSFW a thing in Lemmy?) I’d understand wanting to unfederate from a server that didn’t properly mark it though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Yeah, it is. People forget sometimes, but the instances that allow NSFW are usually pretty strict on having all NSFW stuff be tagged, for federation’s sake.

  • Jeremy [Iowa]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    I’m less concerned with “NSFW or not” than with maintaining quality of discussions.

    I’m pretty sure Lemmy provides settings to leave NSFW blur up to the user; isn’t that sufficient?

  • R. J. Gumby
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    I’m ambivalent on the issue. I don’t plan to use this instance for NSFW content but I’m not opposed to it. Also, it’s your server, your call. There is an option to not display NSFW content in user profile settings so, as long as content is appropriately tagged, I don’t think it’s a problem.

  • @oryx
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    Defederation should be a last resort for problem instances. I don’t understand why so many people are suddenly so defederation-happy all of a sudden. Turn off NSFW content in your settings and just block any communities you don’t want to see. If it remains a problem down the line, then consider defederating.

  • 50gp
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    would helpf if there were more advanced settings for what kind of content you want and from where

    for example, only allow nsfw content from whitelisted instances or communities rather than having to rely on manually blacklisting them 1 by 1

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    I have a question about the potential legal problems. If I host my own instance and federate with a server that (like lemmynsfw.com for the sake of argument) allows NSFW content of drawn minors (or apparent minors, whatever, the details don’t matter), their content is copied onto my instance and I’m not hosting that content, right? So if that content is illegal in my home country, am I now hosting illegal content?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Not a lawyer. But I would say if the content exists on your host, even in a cache, you would be liable

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        That’s where I landed too. I’m tempted to run my own instance just for me to avoid hassle with defederations down the line, but it’s a no-brainer to block all nsfw content right now, the risk is crazy.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    When viewing new, I get a lot of posts from that instance that aren’t blurred… I’m not sure if it’s a tagging issue or a Jerboa issue, but it’s pretty obnoxious. I’m still generally supportive of keeping it around, but I hope they find a way to get that under control soon.

    • Bob
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      It’s a tagging issue. Essentially people are used to not having to tag posts in NSFW subreddits because they’re set to NSFW by default. That function doesn’t yet exist in Lemmy, so people are forgetting.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Actually, I just tested and it seems to be Jerboa. The same post behaves differently between desktop and Jerboa, unless it’s an app setting I’ve overlooked.

  • Cisop Sixpence
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    While I am not seeking NSFW content, I’m not offended by it. Nice to know I can adjust my own settings accordingly. ツ

  • @TheZeke
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    I absolutely hate the blur. If I’ve enabled “Show NSFW content” in my settings I want to see NSFW content. Period.