Florida Judge Aileen Cannon failed to disclose lavish trips hosted by influential conservative law school

Florida District Court Judge Aileen Cannon failed to disclose her attendance at several right-wing judicial seminars — including one that took place after she began overseeing former President Donald Trump’s classified documents case, which she ultimately threw out — in apparent violation of federal court rules.

According to a Tuesday report from ProPublica, in May of 2023, Cannon attended a swanky banquet hosted by George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School — one of the leading conservative law schools in the nation. The school was renamed in honor of the late Supreme Court justice after a $20 million donation brokered by Supreme Court architect Leonard Leo, who controls a billion-dollar dark money fund and serves as co-chair chairman of of the Federalist Society, the powerful conservative lawyers network.

Cannon, a longtime member of the Federalist Society, attended a lecture and dinner alongside members of the society, Scalia’s family members, and prominent federal judges, according to materials obtained by ProPublica. Cannon submitted several reimbursement requests to the law school related to her travel expenses.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    741 day ago

    Anyone who thinks this is just a Trump thing is insane. It doesn’t end with him. The entire system needs to be purged of this corruption.

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    English
    1101 day ago

    Corrupt judge caught doing corrupt things to help corrupt friends that got her the job….

    • snooggums
      link
      English
      301 day ago

      If only there was some kind of pattern!

  • @AshMan85
    link
    1151 day ago

    she should be charged with aiding and abetting

  • @2pt_perversion
    link
    551 day ago

    There shouldn’t be any paid resort trips for judges in the first place, even with disclosure.

    Week long colloquiums at a resort in Montana paid for by some conservative group? Why do judges need a colloquium in the first place? They don’t need to go to a conference to tell them how to judge things based on political lines. There’s already a system of judges that’s supposed to interpret grey areas of the law as a group that’s the whole point of appellate courts and the multi-judge panels on them.

  • @Feathercrown
    link
    English
    211 day ago

    ANY doubt of the judge’s impartiality in this case should result in them being replaced immediately, let alone blatant corruption like this.