At that stage they are not hiding that they are a ads and AI company anymore.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    56 hours ago

    As long as they keep supporting the framework for Firefox we’ll still get working forks like LibreWolf.

    Hopefully Ladybird starts picking up more in the next few years…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    491 day ago

    Everyone: Mozilla should find new revenue streams in order to become truly independent.

    Mozilla: We’re open to suggestions

    Everyone: …

    Mozilla: We’re going to explore doing so in an organic method across our products using the methodology that big tech is generating money, but with a Mozilla spin.

    Everyone: How dare you!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      58 hours ago

      If Mozilla is engaging in unethical behavior that publicly violates its own alleged principles, people can point it out.

      But sure, here are a few suggestions:

      1. Continue finding white label services they can sell, such as Mozilla VPN
      2. Create a donation system using GNU Taler that you can put towards websites you visit, like brave Rewards already has.
      3. Allow users to give donations explicitly to Firefox development instead of Mozilla itself.
      4. End the $65 million in donations towards AI.
      5. Follow typical market forces and lower the CEO pay instead of raising it by nearly $2 million.
    • @cm0002
      link
      191 day ago

      We’re going to explore doing so in an organic method across our products using the methodology that big tech is generating money, but with a Mozilla spin.

      Hm yes, the “we’re built different so we won’t be affected by enshittification” option

      that support advertising in clients (Firefox, MDN, Pocket, Fakespot, etc)

      Ah, the “Mozilla Spin” is to put fucking ads in Firefox, got it.

        • @cm0002
          link
          18
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Not in the browser. From web pages sure, but it sure as hell sounds like they’re going to shove ads in the browser like MS has been testing in the start menu. Once that starts who knows, maybe they’ll have their own little Chrome manifest v3 rollout that breaks adblocking for webpages too.

          Based on this and the past year of “mistakes” it’s sure looking more and more like they’re trying to push ahead on the enshittification path.

          If they’re so desperate to find other sources of income why does the Mozilla CEO not take a pay cut out of that 10 million/year

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            I’m all for shitting on bad decisions by mozilla but pretty sure there has been zero mention of ads in the actual browser itself. Do you have proof?

            Edit: edited because my original wording was a bit aggressive.

            • @cm0002
              link
              4
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              We’re growing the Mozilla Ads product team, passionate about display advertising in Mozilla products that is privacy-respecting and values-aligned. You will be one of the lead engineers that will craft, build, and be responsible for the core systems, both front-end and back-end, that support advertising in clients (Firefox, MDN, Pocket, Fakespot, etc). You and your team will be the domain guides when it comes to advertising, providing direction and shepherding to various product teams across Mozilla.

              Ofc some reading between the lines is needed, they’re not going to just blatantly say something they know will be incredibly unpopular this early.

              And like I said, its just another on a pile of mounting evidence of a year of bad decisions

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                420 hours ago

                It’s definitely concerning the way it’s going. I’ll say that much. I really hope that doesn’t happen.

          • Tamlyn
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            predetermined bookmarks and tials on the startpage count as ads. There is even a tial showing different websites as ads. It’s easy to remove, but there are already ads as sabeW4K3 mentioned

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            023 hours ago

            They’re not going to serve ads in page outside of sponsored tiles and things of that ilk and there’s been no suggestion otherwise.

  • macniel
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The Ads position:

    We’re growing the Mozilla Ads product team, passionate about display advertising in Mozilla products that is privacy-respecting and values-aligned. You will be one of the lead engineers that will craft, build, and be responsible for the core systems, both front-end and back-end, that support advertising in clients (Firefox, MDN, Pocket, Fakespot, etc). You and your team will be the domain guides when it comes to advertising, providing direction and shepherding to various product teams across Mozilla.

    Yeaaaah fuck off Mozilla, we don’t want Ads.

    They Slogan

    Why Mozilla?

    At Mozilla, we’re serving humanity—by maintaining a safe, open internet—while also helping the individual humans employed here to reach their personal and professional goals. […]

    I guess that’s no longer the case then?

    • @Bookmeat
      link
      723 hours ago

      When you don’t have a business plan you choose ads.

  • FarraigePlaisteach
    link
    1124 hours ago

    The “I don’t care if you go broke, give me what I want” stance I’m seeing online seems short-sighted at best and narcissistic at worst.

    • smpl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      As a general stance “People want me to give them free shit. I say gtfo.”, I understand you.

      That’s just not proportional to Mozilla and Firefox. In 2022 they had a total revenue of $595 million¹. That allows them to hire 3305 software developers at a salary of $180.000. Google was responsible for 81% of that revenue¹. If you remove Google and their influence from the equation you’re left with $113 millon and Mozilla can then hire 628 software developers. I think that would be more than adequate to maintain a browser.

      1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corporation
      • tb_
        link
        111 hours ago

        I’m sure those developers don’t need any material like, say, software, or a desk. Or other staff to write those paychecks and resolve disputes. Or give direction. Nor would the company need to host any downloads or other websites.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1322 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure Mozilla becoming a cheap Google clone is not good long term