edit: after 20 comments, i’m adding a post description here, since most of the commenters so far appear not to be reading the article:

This is about how surprisingly cheap it is (eg $15,000) to buy a complete production line to be able to manufacture batteries with a layer of nearly-undetectable explosives inside of them, which can be triggered by off-the-shelf devices with only their firmware modified.

screenshot of paragraph from the article saying "The process to build such batteries is well understood and documented. Here is an excerpt from one vendor’s site promising to sell the equipment to build batteries in limited quantities (tens-to-hundreds per batch) for as little as $15,000:" followed by a screenshot of "Flow-chart of Pouch Cell Lab-scale Fabrication" showing a 20 step process

  • @RememberTheApollo_
    link
    English
    655 minutes ago

    Even though your edit clarified it, I wish we’d stop calling them “exploding batteries”. The battery isn’t the explosive, it’s the explosives that were hidden in the device. I’ve already encountered far too many morons describing conspiracies where the big bad government could make your iPhone explode.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I’m saving this. Not because I want to make bombs, but if it really is that easy to make lithium batteries then knowing about the process will be beneficial someday. It’s hard to find information about how rechargeable batteries work. You probably couldn’t even make a lead acid battery from raw materials using just information on the internet.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    395 hours ago

    Jfc Christ Lemmy.

    Every single comment misunderstanding the point. The batteries are exploding because there’s explosives in them. This does make them exploding batteries. The explode because they are partially made with explosives. Please don’t well actually this.

    No this is not a description of something Israel did, it’s a hypothetical way to do a similar attack to show how within reach of idiot terrorists it is.

    Raising the idea of doing this so everyone is thinking about it is extremely bad for us all. Thanks Israel.

    • @db2
      link
      English
      62 hours ago

      Please don’t well actually this.

      Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

      • @kevindqc
        link
        English
        12 hours ago

        Wow, the Great Hannibal Lecter!

    • femtech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 hour ago

      That does not make them exploding batteries, it had explosives in them. A suicide bomber is not an explosive human.

    • @Tikiporch
      link
      English
      92 hours ago

      I think there may be a couple edits needed in your comment. Reread slowly and get back to us.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      73 hours ago

      No, it doesn’t. The battery itself is not the source of the explosion, it’s the explosive hidden inside it.

      A regular battery cannot be made to explode in this way.

    • @NeoNachtwaechter
      link
      English
      74 hours ago

      Jfc Christ Lemmy.Every single comment misunderstanding the point.

      Pedantics fighting pedantics LOL

      The batteries are exploding because there’s explosives in them. This does make them exploding batteries.

      And when you put the same explosives inside a barbie doll and make it go off, then it wasn’t an exploding barbie doll. Or was it? ;-)

      • @Cocodapuf
        link
        English
        03 hours ago

        Fun fact, a group of pedants is called a flem. To use it in a sentence: “the party was ruined by a flem of pedants”.

  • @LesserAbe
    link
    English
    12 hours ago

    But I don’t want my devices to be bombs

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    466 hours ago

    Just to be clear, the pager thing wasn’t exploding batteries, they had apparently been modified at the production level to have explosives in them, which could be triggered by the pager system itself.

      • @breadsmasher
        link
        English
        276 hours ago

        Did you read it?

        The article literally talks about inserting an explosive layer inside the battery at production. Just like the comment said.

        It isn’t “any batteries can explode”.

        Reports indicate the explosive payload in the cells is made of PETN.

        Such a sheet could be inserted into the battery fold-and-stack process, after the first fold is made (or, with some effort, perhaps PETN could be incorporated into the spacer polymer itself – but let’s assume for now it’s just a drop-in sheet, which is easy to execute and likely effective)

        • Arthur BesseOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -176 hours ago

          Just to be clear, the pager thing wasn’t exploding batteries, they had apparently been modified at the production level to have explosives in them, which could be triggered by the pager system itself.

          What? 🤦 The comment I replied to said:

          Just to be clear, the pager thing wasn’t exploding batteries, they had apparently been modified at the production level to have explosives in them, which could be triggered by the pager system itself.

          It seems clear that “they had apparently been modified at the production level” is referring to the pagers, rather than their batteries. But the article is explaining how it could have been that the batteries were the part of the pager that had the explosives (in which case it was the battery that was exploding).

          • @breadsmasher
            link
            English
            225 hours ago

            You are inferring what someone meant, and then applying some super pedantic reasoning.

            When manufacturing pagers, that includes the pager electronics, the case, and the battery.

            Wasn’t exploding batteries

            The batteries themselves unmodified, standard batteries were not somehow hacked to explode. At some point in the manufacturing of the pagers which includes the battery, explosives were included.

            • Arthur BesseOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -155 hours ago

              You are inferring what someone meant, and then applying some super pedantic reasoning.

              I think I am inferring correctly, especially since the person you’re talking about replied “of course not” to my question about if they read the article.

              • @breadsmasher
                link
                English
                95 hours ago

                alrighty then. Dig your heels in.

                • Arthur BesseOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -95 hours ago

                  i encourage you to re-read the original comment in this thread after reading the article 😂

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 hours ago

        Most other people wont be reading it either so I don’t see an issue with pointing out the obvious misconception people could make based on the headline that talks about exploding batteries.

        • Arthur BesseOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -65 hours ago

          Of course not, what did you expect?

          I encourage you to, it’s pretty interesting.

  • Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    96 hours ago

    And also because it’s impossible.

    So it is actually in fact very hard. What they had was exploding explosives which are not hard.

    • Arthur BesseOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -75 hours ago

      Since apparently many people aren’t reading the article: It is about how cheap it actually is (eg $15,000) to buy a complete production line to be able to manufacture batteries with a layer of nearly-undetectable explosives inside of them, which can be triggered by off-the-shelf devices with only their firmware modified.

      screenshot of paragraph from the article saying "The process to build such batteries is well understood and documented. Here is an excerpt from one vendor’s site promising to sell the equipment to build batteries in limited quantities (tens-to-hundreds per batch) for as little as $15,000:" followed by a screenshot of "Flow-chart of Pouch Cell Lab-scale Fabrication" showing a 20 step process

  • @SlopppyEngineer
    link
    English
    5
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Lithium burns intensely but it doesn’t explode. An electric car can burn for a long time, but they don’t explode. One of the comments says so

    I understand that what happened in Libanon was that dedicated explosives were added to the devices, it was not the batteries exploding. But that does not take away the conclusion of your story.

    It shouldn’t be undetectable. Throw a device from s series into a fire as a spot check and if it burns it’s ok, if it explodes give the entire series to your enemy’s kids to play with.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 hours ago

      Heads up, I don’t think C4 explodes when burned. I think it requires electronic detonation or a blasting cap.

      • @SlopppyEngineer
        link
        English
        22 hours ago

        It’s right next to or in a high intensity lithium fire, not just a normal little flame. That should alter the equation somewhat.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          157 minutes ago

          It’s possible that it could, but could also not. I’d be curious to find out what would happen but unfortunately the feds won’t let me run tests on semtex because I don’t have “the proper permits.” Jerks.

          Maybe we’ll see someone with a license to manufacture destructive devices, like OrdinanceLab on YT, do a video on it (fingers crossed!)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      126 hours ago

      I am not an explosives expert, but I’ve seen enough YouTube videos about explosives to know that not all explosives explode in fire. Some are incredibly stable at extreme conditions right up until deliberately triggered. It all depends on the type of explosives.

      There may still be ways to detect them, but it’s not necessarily going to be that simple.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Yes that’s correct high explosives require a starter explosive. However this starter explosive would also have to be incorporated into the device and the starter explosive is triggered by a spark or a fire. So throwing it in a fire would still work as a test you’d just have to make sure it totally melted before concluding anything.

        • Uranium 🟩
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 hours ago

          They don’t necessarily require a starter explosive, certain types do of course. It’s more about overcoming the initial energy required, for example the arc from an electric arc lighter could probably overcome that requirement in a lot of scenarios.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 hours ago

      Throw a device from s series into a fire as a spot check and if it burns it’s ok, if it explodes give the entire series to your enemy’s kids to play with.

      Most high explosives burn unless detonated properly.

      This is really basic stuff. I don’t think you should be out and about giving people advice about handling (potential) explosives.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 hours ago

      It depends on the explosive, C-4, and I think all plastic explosives, will burn in a fire.