• @gedaliyahM
    link
    151 minutes ago

    This is a huge step. Plastic recycling is a scam literally designed by advertisers to sell more plastic. Much plastic marked as recyclable is not; much cannot be recycled in most areas; much that is technically recyclable cannot be recycled due to cost related to contamination.

    It’s something like 70-80% of Aluminium is recycled globally. For plastics, that number is around 8 or 9 percent.

  • Hello_there
    link
    fedilink
    32 hours ago

    Its been proven that the recycling symbol is placed on things that are not actually known to be recyclable - e.g., yogurt containers - to get people to feel better about buying plastic

    • Joelk111
      link
      1
      edit-2
      60 minutes ago

      It’s actually not the recycling symbol, it’s a plastic identifier symbol that is, for some crazy unknown reason, designed to be very similar to the recycling icon.

  • @Docus
    link
    55 hours ago

    The article is a bit shitty. I’m sure exxon-mobile are lying about something and i do not want to defend them. But the article does not spell out what they said on this topic that was actually a lie, and goes on to state how much was actually recycled - plastic recycling is a complex topic, but the fact that not everything that can be recycled is actually recycled is hardly exxon’s fault

    • comador
      link
      115 hours ago

      This one is a bit better:

      https://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-plastics-lawsuit-exxon/

      “The attorney general’s office pointed to industry documents from the 1970s calling plastics recycling “infeasible” and casting doubt that recycling plastic could ever be economically viable, according to the April announcement.”

      “Bonta specifically named Exxon’s advanced recycling program as being misleading Monday. “92% of plastics in advanced recycling become transportation fuel — only a very small amount is recycled,” he said. “Exxon can only recycle about 1% of its own plastic.””