• HonkyTonkWoman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      that’s why they hired Wade. With Wade around, woo baby… there’s no doubt about it now.

      Wade is just m something else.

  • @Hyperlon
    link
    English
    26 days ago

    I mean, that’s fair. You can’t guarantee not to get hacked unless you shut down your company.

  • @Lost_My_Mind
    link
    English
    577 days ago

    …thats not a promise you can make. Infact, I’d argue that you’re inviting to get hacked, because now some hacker is out there like CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!

    • @dookie0000
      link
      English
      247 days ago

      The easiest way is to not store the data in the first place. Can’t hack data that doesn’t exist. Why does anyone need to keep social security numbers on file.

      • circuitfarmer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        107 days ago

        Especially considering they were explicitly designed NOT for that purpose. Not only is it illegal for government agencies to deny you anything if you refuse to provide an SSN, but until 1972, this verbiage was printed on every Social Security card: “FOR SOCIAL SECURITY PURPOSES – NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      107 days ago

      Of course it is!

      They’re not promising they won’t be hacked again.
      They’re only promising they’ll try not to be. Which is promising practically nothing.

  • @foggy
    link
    English
    217 days ago

    We have a concept of a plan so as to not get hacked.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37 days ago

    T-Mobile is a great sell. But a horrible follow-through. Goodbye T-Mobile forever (as of last week).

    • @M600
      link
      English
      27 days ago

      Who do you use instead?