In the fifty four days since this account was created, it has made four thousand three hundred and ninety-seven submissions to Lemmy.
That’s one every seventeen minutes and forty-one seconds, twenty four hours a day seven days a week.
One rule Reddit Politics had that I loved was the “No Concern Trolling” rule.
That combined with a general bad faith argument rule would clean this kind of trolling up real quick.
The fact that this community hasn’t implemented these kind of rules has been sad. However, it’s not like we’re flooded with this type of content. But that doesn’t mean it’s not an issue
This should just be admin/mod discretion as it’s a very transparent ruse and you can’t make rules to cover all the fringe cases.
So is the “no concern trolling” directed towards me, the subject of that post, or the poster posting my stats? Because I’m unsure what “concern trolling” is in this context.
I didn’t make the stats, friend, and if you have a problem with them you should take it up with the people making the submissions!
Thanks.
I don’t have a problem. You are totally free to keep being obsessed with me.
And I just posted some more, so be sure to update your stats.
I’ll keep posting. Thank you!
I thought you liked the attention?
In the 453 days that the @SatansMaggotyCumFart account has been active, it has made eight thousand two hundred and 25 submissions to Lemmy, which is on average eighteen posts every single day!
My post count is seventy-two, actually.
The account you link has 0 posts and 4 comments…
That’s because you’re in the Lemmy.ca instance.
Nice touch adding graphic of the fact that the mods don’t think I’ve done anything bannable.
Also, I don’t post 24 hours a day. But I’ve just posted some more stuff, so please update your stats for next post. Thank you!
You haven’t done anything bannable, but they do also still think your takes are bad and misleading.
Mf has got “but I’m not touching you! I’m not touching you!” energy in here
I call it big hall monitor energy.
Um, did you read the article I posted? It’s actually an anti-Stein article. lol
Why would I be upset that people don’t like my opinions?
Were you under the impression that I thought people did like my opinions here?! People here def like to let me know what they think of my opinions. lololol
And it won’t stop me from posting what I want, when I want, where I want. And voting for who I want. Thank you!
I switched from being a staunch socialist, voting for the SWPUSA every year to being a proud Harris voter due to your conduct in the comments.
Yes we all know that you know everyone thinks your ideas are trash
Correct, next question.
Edit: Pointed out that you were were talking about the article. Whew!
He was saying to the post article. Jill Stein is definitely working with the GOP, and has been caught numerous times doing so. Her legal representation is Jay Sekulow, her PR firm is working with only GOP candidates and her, and she also has paid a lot of “consulting” money to GOP shadow groups.
Thank you for reading the article. It’s actually an anti-Stein article, so the downvotes are kinda funny.
Do we have that many people here who are anti-democrat/pro-Stein? Or did they just downvote because I posted it, and they didn’t bother actually reading the article (or the freakin’ headline)? lol
I’m anti-Stein, if that’s what you mean.
I was referring to the many downvotes the post has gotten. People are either downvoting because I’m the one posting it, rather than actually reading the article, OR we have a bunch of pro-Stein people suddenly.
I believe it’s the former, and so I was appreciating the fact that you actually read the article, rather than just automatically downvoting and implying that I’m a troll. Read the all the comments in thread. Strange reactions from people not discussing the actual article. :)
People are downvoting because they despise lies
Pretty much true.
She’s working hand in hand with the GOP:
And the Russians:
https://www.newsweek.com/jill-stein-ties-vladimir-putin-explained-1842620
With the sole goal of ensuring Trump wins:
https://www.newsweek.com/jill-stein-how-why-i-will-stop-kamala-harris-winning-white-house-1961100
Naturally, the Democrats will point all this out.
What’s hilarious about this posting scenario, is that the post is getting downvoted simply because I posted it. Which is fine and par for the course, but it’s actually an anti-Stein article!
So thank you for actually reading before commenting!
Shows how many people downvote without even reading the article though! lmao
MSN.com - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for MSN.com:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
