• @ikidd
    link
    English
    491 year ago

    I guess if you include the territory that was very briefly held when Russia was making a push into Kyev, that’s true, but the lines in the East have held pretty steady since the early days of the war.

    Short of bringing US-style air superiority to play there, I can’t see that they’ll gain much in the near term.

    • @ForgetReddit
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      I think the play needs to be a stalemate/slow advance until Putin dies. His successor will either accelerate or withdraw imo. Can’t bleed resources like that forever and remain in power, Putin is grandfathered in but the new guy won’t be. Unfortunately Putin could die tomorrow or in ten years. Hopefully it’s sooner than later.

      • @lemmyshmemmy
        link
        English
        -141 year ago

        Ukraine definitely has political stability and morale as good advantages. They’re also continually getting additional military support as time goes on.

          • @lemmyshmemmy
            link
            English
            -151 year ago

            True, Russia has run out of prisoners, Wagner is gone, Chechens are disengaging, Belarus is s clear “no”, and the rest of the population is unwilling and getting restless.

            The Kremlin is too scared to even call it a war, let alone try widespread mobilization. They saw how Prigozhin waltz into Rostov-On-Don and act like a celebrity.

  • 1bluepixel
    link
    English
    371 year ago

    50% since Russia’s gains early in the war, and most of it in late 2022 during the first counter-offensive.

    They have NOT been making major gains during the current counter-offensive, unfortunately.

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      The hardest part of the counteroffensive is the first part, they’re pushing into the most heavily defended and fortified territory held by Russia. It will obviously be slow going, until eventually they break through and progress will happen more rapidly after that.

    • @anewbeginning
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That was never going to happen. The lines have to strongly defended. But it is no assurance of defeat. It only increases the expense and time to recover. And once Ukrainians have some air force capabilities their combined arms offensive capabilities will be much greater.

      • @lemmyshmemmy
        link
        English
        -31 year ago

        I thought they’d been training on F-16s since last summer. Disappointing to see that moving so slowly

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    Give em F-16s, Blinken! They are designed to kill MiGs, and will provide much needed air support!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      F16’s won’t give Ukraine much of an advantage until sufficient numbers of pilots are a trained. There are two weapons that could immediately change the battlefield landscape. GLSDB’s and ATACM’s are long range precision bombs that would allow Ukraine to target Russian supply lines and ammunition stores far behind the front lines, including into Crimea. They both have backup inertial guidance systems in order to mitigate GPS jamming… which is a big problem for their current guided munitions.

      • @lemmyshmemmy
        link
        English
        -151 year ago

        supply lines and ammunition stores

        And helis still on the pad. Much easier than trying to take them out with MANPADS teams or risking valuable AA systems near the front line.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      The problem with F-16’s is that when they’re inevitably shot down, the videos will be all over the net and it will look awful from a spend perspective.