The Federal Reserve has already launched a small test of near-instantaneous financial transactions. Every time they talk about payments as a future feature of X/Twitter, I wonder if they know that’s getting Sherlocked.

  • @cyd
    link
    English
    411 year ago

    Many countries, including those in the developing world, have had instant payments systems for years. They’re very convenient, especially those that provide an “overlay” service (usually coming with a standardized app) that allows sending money to registered phone numbers, without dealing with bank account numbers.

    Characteristically, the US version of instant payments seems half-assed. It’s initially supported by only 35 banks (not including Citi and Bank of America). And it apparently does not provide a standardized overlay service. Many big financial stakeholders, including the credit card companies, no doubt view it as a threat and would be very happy if it does not catch on.

    • @Dark_Blade
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      It’s honestly amazing how quickly a lot of developing countries have embraced this stuff. Hell, even roadside hawkers in a country like India accept instant bank transfers. It’s ridiculous that the US is so far behind.

      • @Sanctus
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        No, because corporations like PayPal and Meta lobby against it. They got it don’t worry about it.
        /s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Yes, writing this from Western Europe Americans not being able to wire each other money instantly is so confusing.

    • miracleorange
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      As far as an overlay service goes, Zelle basically fills that niche, and it’s increasing in popularity. I think FedNow is more for larger payments.

      • trafficnab
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Zelle still takes a few days to complete transfers in my experience

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      It is hard to get away with the crimes the bankers and other big finance entities have grown accustomed to committing as a part of their day to day business with instant resolution. Read up on failing to deliver, or as entities like Citadel like to term it, “sold, not yet purchased", like they did to the tune of 60B dollars.

      It is like selling someone a house that you don’t own and may not even really exist. They can do this because they have a time period in which they have some leeway before they have to deliver the “deed" so to speak. It goes deeper than that but that is a simplified high level overview of the scam.

      Simply put, the stock market is all fake and nothing is valued appropriately because price discovery us impossible with naked shorting and the use of OTC and dark pools.

  • Proteus
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    interesting stuff. I wonder how it’s developed since that article was published.

      • @cyd
        link
        English
        111 year ago

        It’s also great for splitting checks at restaurants, paying for odd jobs, and paying street vendors. Many countries already have instant payments, so it would be nice if it caught on in the US, but you never know — lots of nice things don’t catch on in the US for one reason or another.

      • @DocMcStuffin
        link
        English
        111 year ago

        Depends on how you look at it. According to the article, FedNow is more expensive than automatic clearing house. 4 cents vs half a cent. But if FedNow is competing with Venmo and Paypal, they charge a lot more than the Fed’s $0.04. That’s also cheaper than what the credit card companies charge businesses.

      • kitonthenet
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        The banks might choose to make it costly. The fed charges 4 cents per transaction. Ultimately, if your bank charges 25 cents and my bank charges 4 cents, I’ll just decline to use your bank for FedNow

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -13
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    While it’s cool and groovy the the Fed is finally seeing the light that crypto currencies have some merit, fat chance a US govt backed coin will be trusted to replace cash by the world at large (considering the USD being the world reserve currency).

    Turns out I misread the entire thing, apologies.

    • @cyd
      link
      English
      25
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      FedNow isn’t a cryptocurrency. It’s a real-time funds clearing system, with a centralised ledger. It’s not supposed to replace cash, but rather old school bank transfers that take days to clear.

      You might be thinking about digital currencies which are something else the Fed is trialling and is not yet very far along.

      • Kichae
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wait. Do… Do you guys not have e-transfers? Holy shit, this is why Venmo’s a thing, isn’t it?

        • kitonthenet
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          yes, and it’s why Venmo won’t be a thing much longer. Expect a lot of bitching from Venmo et al in the coming months