• @UnderpantsWeevil
    link
    English
    1281 month ago

    AI comments under an AI generated article being inflated by AI account activity. Who even needs end users anymore? Its a perfectly autonomous system.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      421 month ago

      Who even needs end users anymore?

      Advertisers do, and if they ever wise up spez’s house of cards will crumble.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        English
        511 month ago

        Advertisers don’t need end users. They just need happy bosses willing to cover their salaries.

        In that sense, the business marketing team and the Reddit “look at our bullshit numbers” team are on the same side of the field.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          301 month ago

          It’s easy to bullshit engagement, it’s tougher to bullshit click-through rates and sale conversion metrics. It will take time to identify patterns, but inevitably the data will begin to reflect the truth, that’s when advertisers will break and move their money to more successful (organic) platforms.

          At least this is what happens in a sane world, as for our reality who knows.

          • Draconic NEO
            link
            3
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            If they haven’t figured it out by now they probably never will. After all fake engagement isn’t a new thing, not by a long shot. They’ll probably just make some excuse about banner blindness for why click-through rates are down, possibly trying to also justify more aggressive ads, and more spending.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          91 month ago

          Yep. As long as sales and marketing can point to some bullshit KPI metrics as having exceeded all their goals, they act like they are the ones who bring in the profit.

          Nevermind no one is buying anything and no traffic is going to the website, that is a different profit center’s problem and certainly not the fault of the MBA losers.

    • @Meltrax
      link
      361 month ago

      Ironically there used to be a subreddit for this.

      It was intentionally meant to be view-only for humans, and the bots within it were named for and trained on other subreddits. So you have AdviceAnimalsBot, LinuxBot, GamingBot, AskRedditBot, GoneWildBot, etc. They would post on a rotation, emulating what users in their respective subreddits posted. They would all comment on each other’s posts, emulating their respective subreddit’s comments.

      As an experiment it was actually really cool and fun to read through. It was also very clear that these were bots and you could identify which was which, and nothing was pretending to be a human for karma (there were no votes in the subreddit).

      • @deus
        link
        301 month ago

        You mean r/SubredditSimulator? I miss that place, it was funny as hell.

        • @Meltrax
          link
          16
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yeah that was the one! I had forgotten the name. It was actually a really cool use of bots and a fun microcosm of how they interact with each other. From the perspective of like, a college AI research project, it was really interesting.

          Kinda sucks that that is just the entire website now.

          • @Jesusaurus
            link
            English
            51 month ago

            Guess Reddit liked the idea too and decided to expand on it, for profits

    • @douglasg14b
      link
      27
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yep, and even worse. Lemmy has absolutely NO controls for quality and minimal moderation tools or capabilities. It’s in a much worse position than Reddit.

      If it’s not already happening (And I think it is), it will.

      • Ademir
        link
        fedilink
        101 month ago

        What tools are missing to moderate a LLM bot?

        I am a mod, I receive a report from an user, check it and ban. All done with current tools we have.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          141 month ago

          I receive a report from an user, check it and ban

          That’s all manual effort currently. Someone has to report a problematic post, you have to manually look at it, manually decided if it should be removed, and manually remove it. I’m not the biggest fan of automatically removing content, but when someone posts 500 posts all at once that manual effort is a pain.

  • @kikutwo
    link
    271 month ago

    Be great when the bots permaban other bots.

  • @Mango
    link
    211 month ago

    Dead Internet been here since 2010 at least.

    • Draconic NEO
      link
      111 month ago

      Something that nobody mentions when they talk about dead internet theory that I think should be talked about is that the worthless engagement trolls that are real people, really do not and should not count as real people. They’re never going to give you worthwhile responses, they don’t add anything to conversations. Unless they see an opportunity to pick a fight they’re probably not even listening to you.

      Therefore they’re not really any different than an AI run account that’s not going to acknowledge you. And in some ways they are much worse, despite being technically “real people”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        401 month ago

        I can’t exactly put my finger on it, but every god damn thing ChatGPT spits out has the same cadence or structure. Something about how it lays out points and wraps it up, and its usage of commas, is so noticeable to me.

        • @davidgro
          link
          191 month ago

          Hmm. As an overuser of commas myself, I better try to tone that down.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            10
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I wouldn’t say it’s necessarily overuse of commas, it’s how it consistently uses them the same way in nearly every response. It’s something about the overall structure of what it spits out. I wish a linguist would pop in and break it down for me. It’s a combination of tone, tense, arrangement of the sentences, how the paragraphs are put together - all of it feels very samey to me, unless it’s prompted otherwise.

            There’s only a few “styles” of sentences it spits out and to me, it seems quite obvious. Humans don’t write that consistently all the time, they’re messier.

            • @davidgro
              link
              41 month ago

              Ok, good, that makes sense. I was getting worried for a minute.

          • Boozilla
            link
            English
            61 month ago

            I feel you. My thoughts often spill out that way, too.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          111 month ago

          Yep the same thing if you make it roleplay as characters in a conflict. It always tries to find middle ground and end it

        • Boozilla
          link
          English
          81 month ago

          Lots of compound sentences. And a “tone” suitable for USA Today. At least, that’s the vibe I get from ChatGPT.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 month ago

          To me, ChatGPT always sounds like a high school freshman submitting a half-assed English paper.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          Tbf I also form sentences like this when I’m not being a total bitch and dunking on fools.

      • @fluxion
        link
        English
        201 month ago

        If you look closely you can tell it was typed with 6-finger hands

  • @GaMEChld
    link
    31 month ago

    Well that seems better worded than much of reddit.

  • @jasep
    link
    21 month ago

    I understand this was posted in the Reddit community, but also…

    Who cares? Let that cesspool die.

  • @DempstersBox
    link
    -11 month ago

    Huh.

    So in my ‘frequently visited’ list, very recently a link to chatGPT has populated.

    I’ve poked at a few of the generative ai things, but only the actual chatgpt once, months ago, and have wondered if there’s enough bullshit from reddit to give it enough dings to make the list.

    Apparently so

      • @DempstersBox
        link
        11 month ago

        Hi! Made an account over on some other lemmy server, and apparently the guy running it was old, had health problems, and (rightly so) stopped giving two shits about an internet forum.

        Reddit sucks enough I’ve tried again. It’s going okay. I don’t give enough of a shit to really figure how the whole lemmy/fediverse works, but at least it aint corpo garbage